I don't think I would necessarily dismiss all of the authors complaints as "sour grapes" out-of-hand. Safety concerns do need to be taken seriously.
However, complaints also need to be supported and justified/validated to be relevant and appropriate. Just because someone complains - does not necessarily make them "right", neither. Some people unfortunately are quick to assume the role of "victim" if they get any dissent on their complaints.
Take for example his comments re: batteries in the strobes. He calls them "incorrect" rather than state if the strobes actually worked - or not (IMPORTANT fact, I think!). Many hand-held GPSs state that you should only use lithium batteries verses normal alkaline batteries. However, alkaline batteries work - I've used them for years on hand-held GPSs with no noticeable difference. I am instead assuming that the strobes did in fact work.
He would have generated more sympathy and respect from me if he had of included that rather pertinent info as to whether the strobes worked in his long list of grievances.
I can only assume that he was instead selective in what information he presented in the letter - presenting only info that supports his assertion as being some kind of victim. Makes me wonder what else he is being selective about. I don't see that as being fair nor responsible - nor contributing to a dialogue that would resolve issues within a team.
Makes me also wonder if the reason he seems to consider himself some sort of a pariah as being based on his lack of being able to reconcile another opinion and get his way. Makes me wonder if others on his "team" see it the same way. Makes me wonder if inexperience is clouding his objectivity & understanding.
As confirmation of that - he relates another incident where he blames the coxswain for not dictating to the crew to put on their safety harness and helmets. It is always up to each individual to ensure their safety and there was nothing (including demands or no demands from the coxswain) preventing each crew member whom wanted to - to done whatever gear they they had and felt prudent to wear. No where in that letter does he accept responsibility like that - for his own safety. It appears always to be somebody else's "fault".
That makes it hard to believe that every one of the many grievances he has as being legit & supported... for me, at least.
Thanks for posting the letter, pastafarian
