Sorry still don't get it. We have 12% of the TAC and have borrowed another 3% to get to 15% that is the major underlying issue but it never seemed to be an issue when it was 2/3. Now the population has crashed and TAC went down we still have 15%, SFAB decided on the regs not dfo I would rather it be 1/1 no size limit but the lodges will never agree to that so go to meetings and outvote them which wont happen because we all work. As for the experimental license it has no impact on the sport tac at all it comes from the 85% we don't have access to. If you don't like it go to the meetings and vote try to make gifting of halibut illegal and you will add another month to your season. Where I come from the fishing is a privilege not a right. If you don't like these regs on halibut just give it 5 years when Chinook is 1 a day and 10 a year.
HnS, I'm sorry you still don't get it.
-First of all, recreational anglers didn't borrow 3%, it was re allocated to them because 12% was obviously inadequate to execute a fishery of traditional length during times of low abundance (a flaw in the original allocation policy, they gave their buddies a bigger piece of the pie than they deserved, and neglected the needs of the commons). After all, it is a common property resource, owned by all Canadians, not just the "Slipper skippers" who should have to actually fish their quota!
-Secondly, The SFAB may have recommended the current management scenario, but it was done with the intention of providing opportunity to the greatest number of anglers, and the longest season possible for everybody. I like the idea of 1/1 no size limit, but if a bunch of people high graded, the average size harvested would increase and the recreational allocation could be exhausted mid summer. The sector gets a set # of pounds, and when it is caught the season is over, weather we like it or not. Want to change this? Call every politician in your area and let them know the allocation stinks.
-Thirdly, the experimental licence is like DFO saying to the public " we gave away your children's property to capitalism, and if you want "reasonable" access to it, you have to pay the slipper skipper. And
no, the money will not go towards stewardship, conservation, enhancement or anything else that Aldo Leopold taught, it will be profit in the pocket of big business. Ever play monopoly?
-Fourth, the gifting part is commie BS!!! But if there was any argument here, its been extinguished by the annual limit. If I can only catch 6, why would I give one away?
-Finally, you are right about Chinook. If DFO continues to allow all the commercial fisheries to pound the snot out of everything that swims, ocean productivity will continue to plummet and there will be nothing for salmon to eat. Check out TAC's for all species, they keep dropping and dropping and dropping. Sustainable, ya right...