Low snowpack could be ‘disastrous’ for salmon, scientist says

http://www.theprogress.com/news/312622791.html

Sockeye salmon in hot water on the Fraser

Gillnetters on the Fraser River haul in sockeye salmon last summer. Fewer sockeye are projected to return this year and there are growing fears that poor river conditions will hammer the survival rate of the ones that do. - Colleen Flanagan / Black Press
Gillnetters on the Fraser River haul in sockeye salmon last summer. Fewer sockeye are projected to return this year and there are growing fears that poor river conditions will hammer the survival rate of the ones that do. — image credit: Colleen Flanagan / Black Press

by Jeff Nagel - BC Local News

posted Jul 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM

Dangerously hot water temperatures in the Fraser River, combined with low river flows and unusually warm ocean conditions are conspiring to create a dire outlook for returning sockeye salmon.

And that could mean no fishing at all for the roughly 6.8 million sockeye projected to be on their way back to the Fraser to spawn – easily enough for what should have been a decent season.

"What's going on now is not good and I don't anticipate it being good in August," said Mike Lapointe, chief biologist for the Pacific Salmon Commission. "But it's just a matter of waiting to see where the indicators are at that time and making the decisions based on the evidence we have. I think the observed data is going to be pretty extreme."

He said it's "certainly possible" that sockeye fisheries will be severely curtailed or even cancelled altogether because a large proportion of the run may not survive to reach the spawning grounds.

A record low snowpack in the mountains this year has meant what little snow was in the alpine has melted off sooner than usual, leaving less to keep stream and river levels up and their temperatures down later in the summer.

Fraser River temperatures at Hope have already gone over 19 degrees in recent days, Lapointe said, when the norm at this time of year is less than 15 degrees.

"It's extremely warm," he said, adding the lower water flows compound the problem.

"It's like a bathtub. If you don't have a lot of water in it, it's really sensitive to the temperatures around."

High temperatures of 19 or 20 and higher can be deadly for salmon, which face more stress in their migration upriver to spawn, and they may also be more susceptible to disease.

"As soon as they start to reach these temperatures they're just not as efficient at migrating," Lapointe said. "It becomes harder for the fish to do the work they need to do."

The Pacific Ocean hasn't been kind to these returning sockeye either.

Northeast ocean waters up to the Gulf of Alaska have been unusually warm from late 2013 through 2014 – the entire time the now-returning sockeye have been at sea.

Warm ocean water can deplete plankton food supplies and sometimes results in many juvenile salmon being devoured by predator fish like mackerel coming up from much farther south.

Lapointe said he's heard reports of smaller salmon body sizes in Alaska, but there's no confirmation yet it will be the same story for Fraser sockeye.

The warm ocean tempeatures could impact not just this year's runs, but the next couple of years as well, he said.

Lapointe is also concerned the warm river temperatures are becoming a trend.

"Fraser summer temperatures have been getting warmer over time, not inconsistent with the sort of predictions you would get from climate change models."

He said different individual sockeye stocks may perform better than others in warmer conditions, depending on their past exposure.

More fishing may be possible for less desirable pink salmon, which return later in the summer.

Watershed Watch Salmon Society executive director Aaron Hill fears the river conditions will only deteriorate.

"The low water and high temperatures are combining to create lethal water conditions for salmon," Hill said. "Unless we get some rain it's just going to get worse and worse through the summer."

He's urging fishery managers not to authorize aggressive fisheries this year in order to put as many sockeye on the spawning grounds as possibler to ensure conservation of weak stocks.
 
If DFO and the PSC were really sharp, they would look up the Sockeye return of 1998 which was an El Niño year to see what history can teach us.

http://www.psc.org/pubs/Frp98-webb.pdf





http://www.theprogress.com/news/312622791.html

Sockeye salmon in hot water on the Fraser

Gillnetters on the Fraser River haul in sockeye salmon last summer. Fewer sockeye are projected to return this year and there are growing fears that poor river conditions will hammer the survival rate of the ones that do. - Colleen Flanagan / Black Press
Gillnetters on the Fraser River haul in sockeye salmon last summer. Fewer sockeye are projected to return this year and there are growing fears that poor river conditions will hammer the survival rate of the ones that do. — image credit: Colleen Flanagan / Black Press

by Jeff Nagel - BC Local News

posted Jul 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM

Dangerously hot water temperatures in the Fraser River, combined with low river flows and unusually warm ocean conditions are conspiring to create a dire outlook for returning sockeye salmon.

And that could mean no fishing at all for the roughly 6.8 million sockeye projected to be on their way back to the Fraser to spawn – easily enough for what should have been a decent season.

"What's going on now is not good and I don't anticipate it being good in August," said Mike Lapointe, chief biologist for the Pacific Salmon Commission. "But it's just a matter of waiting to see where the indicators are at that time and making the decisions based on the evidence we have. I think the observed data is going to be pretty extreme."

He said it's "certainly possible" that sockeye fisheries will be severely curtailed or even cancelled altogether because a large proportion of the run may not survive to reach the spawning grounds.

A record low snowpack in the mountains this year has meant what little snow was in the alpine has melted off sooner than usual, leaving less to keep stream and river levels up and their temperatures down later in the summer.

Fraser River temperatures at Hope have already gone over 19 degrees in recent days, Lapointe said, when the norm at this time of year is less than 15 degrees.

"It's extremely warm," he said, adding the lower water flows compound the problem.

"It's like a bathtub. If you don't have a lot of water in it, it's really sensitive to the temperatures around."

High temperatures of 19 or 20 and higher can be deadly for salmon, which face more stress in their migration upriver to spawn, and they may also be more susceptible to disease.

"As soon as they start to reach these temperatures they're just not as efficient at migrating," Lapointe said. "It becomes harder for the fish to do the work they need to do."

The Pacific Ocean hasn't been kind to these returning sockeye either.

Northeast ocean waters up to the Gulf of Alaska have been unusually warm from late 2013 through 2014 – the entire time the now-returning sockeye have been at sea.

Warm ocean water can deplete plankton food supplies and sometimes results in many juvenile salmon being devoured by predator fish like mackerel coming up from much farther south.

Lapointe said he's heard reports of smaller salmon body sizes in Alaska, but there's no confirmation yet it will be the same story for Fraser sockeye.

The warm ocean tempeatures could impact not just this year's runs, but the next couple of years as well, he said.

Lapointe is also concerned the warm river temperatures are becoming a trend.

"Fraser summer temperatures have been getting warmer over time, not inconsistent with the sort of predictions you would get from climate change models."

He said different individual sockeye stocks may perform better than others in warmer conditions, depending on their past exposure.

More fishing may be possible for less desirable pink salmon, which return later in the summer.

Watershed Watch Salmon Society executive director Aaron Hill fears the river conditions will only deteriorate.

"The low water and high temperatures are combining to create lethal water conditions for salmon," Hill said. "Unless we get some rain it's just going to get worse and worse through the summer."

He's urging fishery managers not to authorize aggressive fisheries this year in order to put as many sockeye on the spawning grounds as possibler to ensure conservation of weak stocks.
 
https://news.gov.bc.ca/stories/fishing-closures-part-of-comprehensive-drought-response-1
Fishing closures part of comprehensive drought response

Environment, Government Operations Friday, July 10, 2015 3:15 PM

PENTICTON - Responding to dry conditions, the Government of B.C. has announced a Level 3 drought rating for the South Thompson, Nicola, Similkameen, Okanagan-Kettle and Skagit regions, and taken the additional action of suspending angling in streams and rivers throughout the South Okanagan due to ongoing low stream flows and warming water temperatures.
 
If DFO and the PSC were really sharp, they would look up the Sockeye return of 1998 which was an El Niño year to see what history can teach us.

http://www.psc.org/pubs/Frp98-webb.pdf

Not sure what you are trying to say here, OBD. Please read Cohen Report, Vol. 1, Chapter 5 (Management of the Fraser River Sockeye Salmon Fishery) as it will give you a very good idea what is involved in managing Fraser Sockeye. You are only skimming the surface. It’s very complex with a lot of information (test fisheries, environmental data, catch monitoring, and terminal escapement surveys) coming in daily. Fraser Panel (Canada and US reps) meet weekly and receive updates on the information I just mentioned. Decisions inseason are constantly made and adjusted as information is also constantly changing.

Back in 1998, concerns were raised about the possibility of prespawn and enroute mortality due to increasing Fraser River water temperatures. Fraser River water conditions are constantly monitored inseason by DFO Environmental Watch Program. As a result, gross escapement targets were increased to offset the anticipated mortality associated with these extreme conditions. Essentially, managers anticipated not all the Sockeye would return to the spawning grounds so in order to meet escapement targets they added on fish so they could meet those escapement targets; however, this reduced the Total Allowable Catch. What should also be mentioned was that back in 1998 management was complicated by the early entry of Late South Thompson Sockeye – several weeks earlier than normal.

In 2015, if water conditions persist (similar to 1998 or even 2013), it is very likely that similar advice will be provided to the Fraser River Panel resulting in zero salmon harvest. This means that management adjustments would be made to gross escapement targets to offset the anticipated prespawn and/or enroute loss of migrating Sockeye to try to meet preseason escapement targets. We are not at that point yet because the Early Stuarts and Chilliwack stocks are in the river now and there are no directed fisheries for them. The bulk of the Fraser Sockeye return in 2015 is forecasted to be the Summers which are not typically in the Fraser right now (at least not in great numbers). This is the part of the run which will likely be the primary focus for any fishery opportunities. When we get closer to August, the Panel will get advice and information in order to decide what action to take in regards to fishing opportunities or fishery closures. I hope this clarifies things.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shuswap,
The report I posted, is the report from the PSC on the history of exactly what happened for the 1998 run.

Yes it is complicated, however historic decisions made might help in future decisions.

Warm water conditions etc., El Niño year.
 
Shuswap,
The report I posted, is the report from the PSC on the history of exactly what happened for the 1998 run.

Yes it is complicated, however historic decisions made might help in future decisions.

Warm water conditions etc., El Niño year.

Managers can use advice based on previous history (like what happened recently in 2013 when the river was closed for fishing due to extreme water temperatures); however, one of the problems with this is that historically there are not many data points to model these events (i.e. what should the proper adjustment be?). When you throw in other anomalies like possible early entry of Late Run Sockeye, earlier or later timing of Sockeye through Area 20, stock identification issues, snow pack and the warm water "blob" off the Pacific (not just El Nino) it makes for very challenging predictions and decision making inseason. Decisions need to be timely as fish do not stop moving for people to make up their minds. Sometimes those decisions were the right ones and sometimes they are not after a retrospective look post-season. Those responsible can only see what the inseason data (i.e. test fisheries, catch monitoring, environmental data, and terminal escapement surveys) is telling them and make decisions accordingly on the best information available at the time.
 
Shuswap,
The report I posted, is the report from the PSC on the history of exactly what happened for the 1998 run.

Yes it is complicated, however historic decisions made might help in future decisions.

Warm water conditions etc., El Niño year.


The report you posted is very valuable but consider that the 1998 El Niño year was the 97/98 winter ocean conditions and the run that came that next summer of 1998. So if we want to be accurate the 2014/2015 is a Blob year with the runs to follow this summer. The coming 2015/ 2016 El Niño will effect next years run. That's why science is telling us we are in uncharted waters. Yes low snow packs and lack of rain make the two look the same but this year is not an El Niño year like 1998 when we consider this years run and the climate conditions from last winter.
 
Thank you shuswap for the info. Please keep us up to date as the season moves on if you can. Many of us a keenly interested and concerned with this years runs.
 
Then there are forward thinking councils.

les-leyne-mugshot-generic.jpg
There’s a reason why Greater Victoria is still dealing with just the usual minor water restrictions while other communities are taking much more severe measures.

It’s a result of the decision 20 years ago to raise the dam on the Sooke Lake reservoir. The five-metre addition and some other upgrades vastly increased the volume of stored water and gave the region far more comfort about supply than other parts of the coast currently have.
But it took a pitched battle with environmentalists who fought the project to the end and a huge political argument that eventually spread to the provincial government. That stalled the project through the worst drought in years and the water supply was on the brink of crisis before the work was finally finished.
The saga comes to mind partly because of the coast-wide drought that could drive other communities to the same sort of crisis this summer. It’s also worth noting in light of two other major public projects that have gone sideways lately.
Vancouver’s transit system looks ready to slip 10 years or more behind the times because of the political paralysis reflected in the referendum result. And Victoria is still 100 years out of date on sewage treatment, with the most recent push to install treatment stalled out because of local fights. Those are both measures of how difficult it is to get anything done across local boundaries. And they reinforce how much credit goes to the officials who pushed the reservoir expansion through.
It was started by the Greater Victoria Water District, an entity owned and operated by the four core municipalities, despite the region-wide service it provided. In the 1990s, a combination of growth estimates, usage rates and storage capacity started a push for an expansion. In the winter of 1995, water was flowing over the old dam at a rate of four million cubic metres a day, about a month’s worth of usage. Most projections suggested that some day, amounts like that would be needed.
But raising the dam also involved widening the reservoir’s footprint, which required logging and removal of an old rail line. The water district was already under the gun for logging operations it ran in the watershed as a sideline. The combination of logging and the potential for contamination from the railway ties attracted the attention of various groups who advocated either more studies or increased conservation instead.
The accumulation of arguments and agitation prompted the NDP government to appoint a special commissioner — David Perry — to review all the complaints about the GVWD in general, and the adequacy of public participation on supply issues.
When the report was received in early 1997, the government approved a delay in the dam project, while all the governance recommendations Perry made were imposed. Thirty-two million cubic metres of water spilled over the old dam over three weeks in January leading up to the announcement, what would have been a half-year’s supply.
Opponents of the dam popped champagne the day that move was made. But miffed local officials warned the delay could become a problem.
The water district was subsequently folded into the Capital Regional District and various land swaps and other changes were made. By 1999, the new model was up and running and officials recommitted to the dam project. But the two-year delay meant Victoria moved into the historic drought of 2000-01 with a reservoir that wasn’t big enough to cope with it.
It was two-thirds empty by the fall of 2000. And the dry winter barely got it two-thirds full by the spring of 2001. If consumption and rainfall rates had continued for another year, the reservoir would have been at six per cent capacity.
So the toughest water restrictions ever imposed in Victoria were announced in April. Stage 3 was declared in the spring and went through the fall and winter.
The dam was finished in 2003, with water down to one-third capacity by then. The size of the reservoir increased by 80 per cent; it gradually filled up and the crisis faded.
It could have been worse, and would be a lot worse today, if the dam hadn’t been raised.
- See more at: http://www.timescolonist.com/opinio...r-water-supply-1.1997302#sthash.ps9CRmX0.dpuf
 
Thank you shuswap for the info. Please keep us up to date as the season moves on if you can. Many of us a keenly interested and concerned with this years runs.

For up to date inseason information the links below are the sites that interested people should be looking at:

http://www.psc.org/news_frpnews.htm
http://www.psc.org/info_inseasonfraserescapement.htm
http://www.psc.org/info_testfishing.htm
http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/habitat/frw-rfo/index-eng.html

This is the first news release from the Pacific Salmon Commission for the 2015 season. It provides a good explanation of where we are at, initial planning, and what could be coming down the pipe very soon:
http://www.psc.org/NewsRel/2015/NewsRelease01.pdf
 
Pressure is rising on the Cowichan River, as drought conditions force its stewards to balance conflicting needs — from the livelihood of mill workers to the lives of salmon.
Much of the region is already under water restrictions after a warm and dry winter and spring, with homeowners unable to water lawns, fill pools or wash cars.
The source of the river is Cowichan Lake; its flow is controlled through a weir owned by Catalyst Paper. The lake’s water level on July 9 was about half what it is in a typical year, and unless it is significantly replenished by rainfall, the flow is projected to begin disappearing on Sept. 16.
If that happens, operations at Catalyst Paper’s Crofton mill, which employs about 600 people, could be affected.
The company is trying to buy more time in the fall — 15 days, to be exact — by reducing the river’s flow now, essentially making what water there is last longer.
Catalyst has already reduced the flow from the usual minimum of 7.0 cubic metres per second to 5.5, with permission from the province.
Two weeks ago, it requested a further reduction to 4.5 cubic metres per second — about as low as the mill can function on. The company has successfully reduced flow to 4.5 cubic metres per second in previous years, including two months last summer.
But this year, the request has been stalled by stakeholders concerned about salmon stocks. “Any reduction in flow from what it currently is will further cause stress on those fish and potentially mortality,” said Andrew Thomson, south coast area director for Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Most southern Vancouver Island rivers are already under a fishing ban because of the drought. Low river levels can strand fish in pools, cutting them off from the main stream and making it so they can’t make it upstream to spawn. The shallower water can also become too warm, causing stress to fish and making them more vulnerable to diseases.
The DFO has detected about 40 fish in the lower river, indicating a spring run, but they haven’t made their way to Cowichan Lake yet, Thomson said. “Knowing those fish are in the system, we’re quite concerned,” he said.
The department is planning to conduct a stream survey with the Cowichan Tribes this week. They will be looking to determine whether the salmon are in safe spots, before supporting the flow reduction.
Cowichan Tribes Chief William Seymour couldn’t be reached for comment.
Thomson has visited streams and rivers across the Island and said the Cowichan River chinook is not unique in its vulnerability.
“I’ve gone up Vancouver Island and this is pretty much unprecedented, in my memory,” he said.
“We have some very extreme water-flow conditions in a lot of our rivers.”
The water levels also affect other river users. North Cowichan maintains the Joint Utility Board’s wastewater treatment plant, which serves about 30,000 people. Treated sewage is discharged into the river, where the water dilutes the waste to levels considered safe.
The dilution still falls within the safe range, but it’s at the low end of what’s ideal, said John MacKay, North Cowichan’s director of engineering and operations. Further flow reductions could change that.
“It provides a safety factor,” MacKay said.
The municipality has already used plastic tubing to extend the outfall to a deeper part of the river. In the long term, the municipality is planning to move the outfalls altogether, as part of its lease agreement with the Cowichan Tribes.
“With the lower river flows, we’re doing additional monitoring,” MacKay said. “We went through this process last summer as well, so we’re kind of prepared for it.”
Recreational tubing is also safer with a stronger river flow.
“When it gets too low, it changes the dynamics, so it can create some safety risks,” said Jacob Ellis, senior policy analyst at the Cowichan Valley Regional District.
Unlike fishing, there are no bans on recreational tubing, he said.
Ultimately, the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations has the final say on water-flow reduction. The province has approved the reduction to 4.5 cubic metres per second “if required,” a ministry official said.
But the ministry depends on information and recommendations from the Cowichan Watershed Board’s flows and fish working group. The stakeholder group meets weekly and will consider the upcoming salmon survey before submitting its approval.
Regardless of the outcome, a mill shutdown is not part of the plan, said Rob Belanger, vice-president and general manager of the company’s Crofton division, adding the company has never stopped operations for lack of water in its 57 years. Catalyst has already reached its goal of reducing water use by 10 per cent since last year and is using saltwater in place of freshwater, where possible, he said.
“If we carefully monitor the flow, we believe we’ll be able to service our customers through the summer,” Belanger said.
“There’s a lot of contingencies and water-reduction strategies we would do before we got to any decision like [shutting down the mill].”
asmart@timescolonist.com



© Copyright Times Colon<article class="previous" style="display: inline-block; width: 1112.15625px; vertical-align: top;">


</article><article class="next" style="display: inline-block; text-align: right; width: 1112.15625px; vertical-align: top;">Family seeks answers after man shot dead by police in Port Hardy


</article>




 
Fishery Notice - Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Subject: FN0662-Salmon - Fraser River Sockeye Update - Areas 11 to 29 - July 13, 2015

The Fraser River Panel met Friday, July 10, to receive an update on the
migration of the Fraser sockeye runs to date and review the status of migration
conditions in the Fraser River watershed.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) provided forecasts of Fraser River sockeye
and pink salmon abundance, timing and diversion rate to the Fraser Panel. The
majority of sockeye returning in 2015 will be recruits from adult spawners in
2010 and 2011. As 2010 was one of the largest returns and spawning escapement
on record, a larger proportion of 5 year old fish is expected this year than
usual. Fraser pink salmon will be returning from the 2013 adult spawners.
Fraser River sockeye and pink salmon forecasts for 2015 are considered highly
uncertain due to variability in annual survival rates and uncertainty about
changes in their productivity.

To put the sockeye run size forecast uncertainty into context, there is a one
in four chance that the actual number of returning sockeye will be at or below
3,824,000 fish (the 25% probability level forecast) and there is a one in four
chance that the actual number of returning sockeye will be at or above
12,635,000 fish (the 75% probability level forecast). For pre-season planning
purposes, the Panel used the 50% probability level forecast (equal chance of a
higher or lower return) of 6,778,000 fish for all management groups except
Early Stuart for which the 25% probability level was used due to the
expectations for overall low abundance and the prediction of a very large
return of 5 year old fish in the forecast.

The pre-season forecast for the 2015 return of Fraser pink salmon that was used
for pre-season planning was the 50% probability forecast of 14,455,000 fish. To
put this into context there is a one in four chance that the actual return of
pink salmon will be less than 10,385,000 fish (the 25% probability level
forecast)and a one in four chance the return will be larger than 20,450,000
fish (the 75% probability level forecast). Fishing decisions for both sockeye
and pink salmon will be based on in-season data.

For 2015 pre-season planning purposes the Early Stuart forecast timing analysis
of July 8 was adopted by the Panel while the historical timing for Chilko of
August 9 was adopted. Timing for all other sockeye stocks was based on
historical correlations with the Early Stuart and Chilko timings mentioned
above. The pre-season forecast of the proportion of Fraser River sockeye salmon
diverting their migration to the Fraser River through Johnstone Strait is 96%.
For modelling purposes the Panel chose to use a diversion rate of 80% through
Johnstone Strait which is roughly the mid-point between the recent year average
of 62% and the above forecast.

The snow pack volume in the Fraser River watershed was near average in April of
this year, however a warmer than normal spring resulted in early and greater
snowmelt throughout the Fraser watershed resulting in the lowest June snowpack
on record. Water levels are forecast to be at or below historic minimum levels
during the sockeye migration period. This combined with above average forecast
for air temperatures has resulted in higher than typical water temperatures
forecasted for the summer months. The combination of very low flows and high
water temperatures are expected to create migration issues for Fraser sockeye
in 2015. As a result, the Fraser Panel has adopted management adjustments for
Early Stuart and Early Summer sockeye that reflect these conditions. The
current river temperature at Qualark is 3.6C higher than average. Discharge is
30% below average. In-season information over the coming weeks will help to
inform future decisions on management adjustments for the Early Stuart, Early
Summer and Summer management groups. Management adjustments are additional fish
that are removed from identified harvest levels and allowed to escape upstream
in an attempt to assist in achievement if identified escapement objectives for
the different run timing groups.

Gill net test fishing began on June 22nd in Area 29 (Fraser River at Whonnock)
and on June 29th at Qualark Creek. Very few sockeye have been caught to date
with no stock identification analyses done at this time. In-season assessment
of Early Stuart sockeye will be provided later in July once more information
becomes available. In-season assessment of all run timing groups generally
occurs shortly after identification of their peak migration through marine
areas.

Currently, First Nations food, social and ceremonial fisheries in marine waters
are non-retention of sockeye. Within the waters of the Fraser River, First
Nations food, social and ceremonial fisheries have been very limited and
directed at chinook. The initiation of sockeye directed First Nations food,
social and ceremonial fisheries is not anticipated before late July or early
August depending upon location.

Fishers are requested to check for the opening times and any restrictions in
their local area. There are no planned commercial or recreational fisheries on
sockeye at this time.
 
http://www.dfw.state.or.us/news/2015/july/071515.asp
ODFW discovers Chinook salmon die-off on John Day River

July 15, 2015

JOHN DAY, Ore. – An estimated 109 wild spring Chinook salmon in the upper section of the Middle Fork John Day River died last week, apparently due to low river flows and warm temperatures.

According to Brent Smith, ODFW fish biologist in John Day, water temperatures in the mid-70s combined with low stream flows likely led to the deaths of these fish. Like many rivers across Oregon, stream flows in the Middle Fork John Day have been extremely low this summer.

The spring Chinook die-off was first discovered by ODFW staff on July 7 near Windlass Creek. The following two days more dead fish were observed during a survey conducted over a 17-mile reach downstream of Hwy. 7.

Similar salmon die-offs occurred in 2007 and 2013 with high temperatures being the main cause. The Middle Fork’s lack of riparian vegetation combined with a wide and shallow channel exposes much of the river to direct sunlight which can lead to cause quick rises in water temperature.

Smith said he expects to see additional salmon mortalities for the rest of the summer until spawning occurs in early September. He said the John Day basin as a whole is seeing a strong salmon return this year and recent summer rains have brought some relief.

###

Contact:

Brent Smith (541) 575-1167, ext. 225
Rick Swart (971) 673-6038
 
Back
Top