Halibut catch limits should be cut by 19 pc for 2011: IPHC

Sushihunter

Active Member

2647_350x263_72_DPI_0.jpg

The most drastic changes for the 2011 Pacific halibut catch limits take place in Areas 2C and 3. (Photo: Icicle Seafoods)​


Halibut catch limits should be cut by 19 pc for 2011: IPHC

UNITED STATES
Tuesday, December 07, 2010, 16:40 (GMT + 9)


The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) has recommended lowering catch limits by 19 per cent for 2011 to 41.02 million lb in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea.

According to the commission, coastwide commercial fishery weight per unit effort (WPUE) fell by 6 per cent this year from 2009, primarily due to drops of 6-24 per cent in the central and western portions of the stock (Areas 3A to 4). Conversely, commercial WPUE rose strongly in Areas 2A and 2B and modereately in Area 2C.

On the other hand, the 2010 IPHC stock assessment survey WPUE values grew only in Areas 2A (109 per cent) and 2B (3 per cent) while skidding from 5-36 per cent in Areas 2C to 4. The coastwide survey index of abundance took a 15 per cent dive from 2009 to 2010.

Several analyses were conducted by the staff this year and added to the catch limit recommendations.

The staff and the Commission have also expressed concern that the IPHC’s Slow Up - Fast Down (SUFD) harvest policy alterations have not been successful in recent years. The staff thus advises incorporating the existing policy of a 33 per cent jump from previous year’s catch limits when stock yields are projected to increase but use a 100 per cent cut in recommended catch when stock yields are projected to diminish.
This year’s stock assessment yielded a coastwide estimate for the 2011 Fishery Constant Exploitation Yield (FCEY) of 41.89 Mlb, a drop of about 6 per cent from the 2010 value of 44.40 Mlb. While FCEY values rose in Areas 2A and 2B, these increases were counteracted by lower values for Areas 2C and 3; next year’s values for Area 4 remained mostly stable.

For 2011, the staff has evaluated potential adjustments to the apportionment procedure for the coastwide exploitable biomass and recommends ongoing use of the hook competition and survey timing factors. For all areas, direct deductions for all bycatch and wastage mortality of 26-32in are made in the area of occurrence to find the FCEY.

The most drastic changes for the 2011 catch limits take place in Areas 2C and 3.
For Area 2C, the difference in the catch limit recommendation mainly results from the application of the SUFullD harvest adjustment. For Area 3, the primary cause of the change is the estimated drop in exploitable biomass.

The Area 2A recommendation includes all removals allocated by the Pacific Fishery Management Council's Catch Sharing Plan. Area 4CDE is treated as a single regulatory unit by IPHC.

The Area 2B catch limit advice includes totals for the commercial and sport fisheries. Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) will assign the adopted catch limit between the two fisheries.

For Areas 2C and 3A, the catch limit recommendation entails using the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authorized Guideline Harvest Levels (GHL) for the halibut recreational charter fisheries of 0.788 Mlb and 3.650 Mlb, respectively, for 2011.


Related article:
- Halibut fishery catch limits set
By Natalia Real
editorial@fis.com
www.fis.com
 
HERE it comes boys get ready you might as well kiss our spring fishery in vic gone!!!!! I bet we will have about a 1 month opening and that will be it.because they wont do general openings for certain area as its too much "work" for them, and im thinking it will be like july or aug when all the lodges really start going up and down the coast. and when there is no tides for us down here.
Also Ill bet ya the commies wont be cut very hard as well.

Wolf
 
What 'Area' are we here on the South Island & Haro?
 
It doesn't surprise me, there's more halibut taken both commercially and by sports fishermen
in Alaskan waters than the entire coast.
maybe it's a good thing that they are protecting some of the biomass and in fact may benefit
the rest of us in the future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are area 19/20 yeah good for the future?? what future??? once we loose something we never get it back thats the problem look at this stupid barbless hook rule they spent 4 plus years studing the effects of barb to barbless and concluded that it was a +- of 5 % yet they did it to protect thompson coho because we were the ones at fault(then) only to later be let go of that saying it was due to poor logging yet its still in place.....hhhhmmmmmm.
We have to fight and let be heard in the next meeting but dont yell and toss stones like rollie said in an earlier post numbers of people present in a meeting is huge then they will know we are serious on any given weekend there is close to 1000 plus people fishing on the lwer van island if we get half of that id be very happy becasue once its gone guys dont expect it back anytime soon.....

Wolf
 
BC is area 2B.
 
The recommended 19% reduction is area 2C (Alaska)
 
Yes I knew that but the way usa bullies us im sure there will be a domino effect it has in the past and if I was a betting man (ok ill put up my 25 cents) it will happen again. cause DFO has no balls to stand up and really manage, just wait im sure FN will step in soon too then we have another bees nest to contend with.

Wolf
 
An earlier post by Sushihunter on 12/02 in the Saltwater Forum indicated that
the IPHC will be recommending moderately higher catch limits for halibut in
B.C. waters when they meet in January in Victoria. However, even with a modest
increase we will still likely be under our final adjusted quota for 2010. The catch
reduction noted is for the total coastwise catch quota from Alaska to California.
Presumably this increase for B.C. is because of a healthy biomass in our waters.
The final numbers will be released at the IPHC meeting in January. Our final
quota will be up to DFO to set - 12% or some other agreed upon arrangement
which will allow our fishery to proceed throughout the year.
 
It is up to the Fisheries Minister to make those kinds of changes. Hope you have her number.
 
Back
Top