Something Wicked This Way Comes - ON THE LINE

Although I wasnt at the rally, I support the cause 100%. This pipeline is the largest environmental threat to our coast and the affected wilderness in our lifetime and I'm not a 'granola'. Hopefully, more and more people realize the threat that this potential pipeline will be to life as we all know it here. Most people are indifferent to the pipeline because they are uneducated to the risk and the track record of the frequent oil spills by enbridge. So keep talking about it!
 
PetroChina bids to help build $5.5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline
http://business.financialpost.com/2...ion-northern-gateway-pipeline/?__lsa=9f50a7fa

CALGARY — Chinese investment in Canada’s energy sector could move to a new level if PetroChina wins a bid to build the controversial Northern Gateway oil sands pipeline.

The largest of China’s three state-controlled oil companies has expressed an interest in building the $5.5-billion project across the northern Canadian Rockies and is considering purchasing an equity stake, said Pat Daniel, president and CEO of proponent Enbridge Inc.

“They have made the point to us that they are very qualified in building pipelines, and we will take that into consideration when we are looking for contractors,” Mr. Daniel said in an interview. “It’s an open bid process. They are a very big organization, they build a lot of pipelines, and they would love to be involved from what they have told me.”

If PetroChina were to become a part-owner in the project, it would have to purchase an equity interest from one of Northern Gateway’s 10 existing owners because there is no room to expand the group, Mr. Daniel said.

Enbridge is a long way from picking builders of Northern Gateway, which is being reviewed by regulators. But with a workforce of almost two million and cheaper labour costs than its North American counterparts, the Chinese company stands a good chance of presenting a competitive bid.

At issue is whether Chinese construction of a major Canadian energy project would increase anxiety among Canadians already worried about China’s expanding ownership of Canadian resources.

On one hand, the Canadian energy sector is strapped for labour as it expands oil sands projects and looks at building liquefied natural gas terminals on the British Columbia coast. It could use a hand from an experienced Chinese oil company. Oil sands companies are already building pieces of projects overseas, including China, and could control costs by handing over even more work on the ground.

On the other, turning over construction of projects to an entity such as PetroChina could mean fewer construction jobs in B.C., where Northern Gateway is a hard sell because of perceptions the province would bear all the risk of a spill, while the rewards would go primarily to Alberta’s oil sands sector.

Critics are already complaining that the province’s environment is being put at risk to feed hungry Chinese energy consumers. There could be concerns about whether a Chinese oil company would meet Canada’s stringent labour, environmental, health and safety standards.

B.C.’s strong unions may have a problem with jobs going to non-unionized foreign labour, which PetroChina will almost certainly use. It won’t help the Chinese case that a division of Sinopec, Sinopec Shanghai Engineering, set a bad precedent in 2007 in work done for Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. Two of its temporary workers were killed when a storage tank collapsed at the Horizon oil sands project. The company asked the Supreme Court of Canada last month to overturn a ruling that would force it to stand trial on 53 safety charges.

PetroChina’s interest in building Northern Gateway marks a deepening of Chinese involvement in Canadian energy.

It started with small equity stakes in start-up oil sands companies that locked up ownership of resources, moved to larger joint ventures that resulted in operating involvement, and in the past year has evolved into full ownership of Canadian projects by PetroChina, Sinopec and the other large state-controlled Chinese company, Cnooc.

PetroChina was one of the original backers of Northern Gateway, but pulled out five years ago because of frustration with delays and lack of Canadian government support.

Since then, Northern Gateway has gained momentum amid efforts by Canadian governments and the oil industry to diversify away from the U.S. market.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper stepped up those efforts since U.S. President Barack Obama denied a permit to the Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf Coast.

After PetroChina backed out, Sinopec, purchased a stake in the project to move 550,000 barrels a day of oil from the Alberta oil sands to a marine terminal in Kitimat, B.C., where it would be loaded into to supertankers and shipped to China and other Asian markets.

Five major oil sands producers revealed themselves in January as shareholders — Cenovus Energy Inc., MEG Energy Corp.,Nexen Inc., Suncor Energy Inc. and Total E&P Canada.

Mr. Daniel said Enbridge would consider PetroChina to a very reputable company with which to partner on projects around the world.

He doesn’t expect British Columbians to be opposed or miss out on employment opportunities if PetroChina builds Northern Gateway.

“There are a lot of Chinese companies that do business in B.C. So, I don’t think it would be new or unique,” he said.

What’s sure is that PetroChina’s involvement would mean more Chinese ownership and control of Northern Gateway, a pipeline that is supposed to free Canada from its energy dependence on the U.S. Market and benefit Canada from the development of its energy resources.



" there is no cure for stupid "
I just heard that they would buy all the pipe and welding equipment from Canadian Tire and Walmart.
Backhoes and oil field equipment from Russia and Pipe Inspection from a Canadian outfit http://www.cnib.ca/en/
GLG
 
PetroChina bids to help build $5.5-billion Northern Gateway pipeline

Five major oil sands producers revealed themselves in January as shareholders — Cenovus Energy Inc., MEG Energy Corp.,Nexen Inc., Suncor Energy Inc. and Total E&P Canada.

What’s sure is that PetroChina’s involvement would mean more Chinese ownership and control of Northern Gateway, a pipeline that is supposed to free Canada from its energy dependence on the U.S. Market and benefit Canada from the development of its energy resources.

GLG

Thanks for all that information, GLG. Many of us may hold one or more of the N.G. pipeline project shareholders in our RRSP portfolios - I have Cenovus. I'm calling my investment advisor tomorrow and I'll instruct him to sell Cenovus and provide him with the reason why. I'll also send a letter to their investor relations office advising them I can no longer hold their company because of involvement in the pipeline. Pissing in the ocean but it's something...

As for ownership and control by China rather than the good ol' USA - a case of better the devil we know?
 
this is an ominous development to say the least. i might suggest that you folks are going to have to find a conservation group with very deep pockets if you think you are going to successfully engage with this sort of scenario. what a ****** turn of events for all concerned!
 
When reading this article I wondered what the "2 deaths in the oil sands" was all about.
Perhaps others would like to read about how China likes to roll in Canada.

http://www.fortmcmurraytoday.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1535612&archive=true

[h=1]53 charges for CNRL, contractors[/h] [h=5]Posted 2 years ago[/h] CAROL CHRISTIAN
Today staff

Following a record 53 charges laid against three companies for a 2007 accident that killed two workers at the oilsands work site, the Alberta Federation of Labour blames the provincial government for not being more vigilant to prevent such a tragedy.
Alberta Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) announced 53 charges yesterday in connection to the April 24, 2007, accident that also injured four other workers, two seriously, at the Canadian Natural Resources Horizon project, about 75 kilometres north of Fort McMurray.
Twenty-nine charges were laid against CNRL, the operator of the Horizon site where the accident occurred. Another 14 charges were laid against contractors SSEC Canada Ltd. and 10 against the Sinopec Shanghai Engineering Company Ltd. The charges included several counts of failing to ensure the health and safety of the workers. Other charges include failing to ensure that a professional engineer prepared and certified drawings and procedures; failing to ensure the roof support structure inside the tank was stable during assembly; failing to ensure that U-bolt type clips used for fastening rope wire were installed properly; and failing to ensure that wire rope being used was safe. The three companies are expected to make their first court appearance June 8 in Fort McMurray.
Hong Liang Liu, 33, an electrical engineer, and Genbao Ge, 27, a scaffolder, died after a roof collapsed in a large oil tank where they were working. Both were non-union employees of Sinopec Shanghai Engineering. CNRL had contracted the company to build the tanks in 2006. Liang had been in Canada since September 2006, while Ge arrived in January 2007. Four other Chinese labourers were injured in the collapse. All were temporary labourers.
No one was injured when a second tank collapsed a few weeks later because the area was still under a stop-work order that covered the three of the 15 tanks from the April 24 accident.
“For the duration of the Horizon project, we maintained a strong safety record on the construction site. We were deeply saddened by the tragic deaths of the two contract workers and the related injuries to the associated contract workers. Our heartfelt sympathies are again extended to their families, friends and co-workers,” said CNRL in a statement issued yesterday afternoon.
Through that same statement, the company noted that as the incident is now in “formal legal proceedings,” it will issue no further comments until the matter has been resolved.
Meanwhile, the Alberta Federation of Labour says that once it was learned that a company from a Third World country with substandard construction safety history had been contracted to do the work, the government should have immediately stepped in to ensure the safety of the site.
“The government ignored the warning signs,” said Gil McGowan, AFL president.
Saying the provincial government dropped the ball, he said when it became public knowledge that CNRL was hiring a Chinese contracting firm to do all the work involved in construction of the tank farm, the provincial government should have stepped in to ensure this company was observing Canadian standards for both worksite safety and construction practices, and not importing substandard Third World practices.
McGowan said it’s a company that has had all of its experience in China, which has an abysmal record when it comes to workplace safety especially in the construction industry.
“That fact alone should have been setting off alarm bells for provincial regulators and inspectors. The government should have had its inspectors on that site from Day 1 supervising the project and making sure Canadian practices and rules were being observed,” he said. “That didn't happen, and the result was this unprecedented tank collapse, which took the lives of two workers and inured four others.” McGowan said this is a tragedy that could have been prevented if the government had seen the red flags and sent inspectors to the site even before ground was broken. Everyone involved in the construction industry knew this was an accident waiting to happen.
“The real tragedy here is that the government ignored the warning signs.”
An important lesson from this case, he said, is the government needs to be extra vigilant when it comes to construction companies coming into Canada from abroad that are not familiar with the Canadian construction context and that are not up to speed on Canadian health and safety rules or accepted Canadian construction practices.
“We think that the Chinese contractors’ lack of familiarity with Canadian standards and practices is at the root of this tragedy. Frankly, we're concerned that they imported substandard practices along with their management team.”
Though he’s pleased the government is proceeding with charges against the companies involved, McGowan said he’s “troubled” over the time it took and is concerned Crown prosecutors “dragged their heels.”
“We think what happened on the CNRL site was one of the most serious violations of occupational health and safety rules and standards that we've seen in this province in a long time, and this is clearly a case where the companies involved have to be held to account,” said McGowan, acknowledging it was satisfying to see the charges hadn't forgotten the injured workers. Some of the charges, all laid under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, also take into account the injured workers and the severity of their injuries as well as workers present when the accident occurred.
But the bigger concern for the AFL is that it's not convinced the charges are enough to prevent a another incident. The only way to avoid such a repeat is if the provincial government becomes more serious about enforcing its own health and safety rules, especially on construction worksites before accidents happen instead of waiting until after someone has died.
“Despite the number of charges being laid, it will be the courts that will determine the facts of the case, and determine the appropriate penalties, if any,” said Barrie Harrison, OH&S spokesman, yesterday. The OH&S Act allows for up to a maximum $500,000 fine for each charge.
It's expected the Crown will only move ahead on those charges that carry a reasonable likelihood of conviction, Harrison said.
“Whether it's 53 charges or one, Occupational Health and Safety takes workplace health and safety extremely seriously and whether it's an injury on site or a death, or in this case a double fatality, all are taken seriously. I think our record over the last number of years when it comes to the number of charges and prosecutions have proven that.”
When a workplace accident — fatal or not — occurs, OH&S has two years to lay charges. In this case, charges came three days shy of the deadline.
The investigation takes a number of months and is followed by a review of the file and work with Crown prosecutors to determine what charges, if any, are warranted.
“It's that process that takes a fair bit of time,” said Harrison. More important, he added, OH&S had to ensure this investigation was proper and thorough because it was focusing on the loss of two lives.
“At the end of the day, that's probably the most important thing. To us, of course, regardless of where these workers are from, their place of origin, or country of birth, has no bearing, because every worker in Alberta has to be treated the same, and these are people who have friends and families and co-workers like the rest of us, and they deserve nothing less.”
During the OH&S investigation, Alberta Employment and Immigration determined that 132 Chinese temporary foreign workers were not paid from April to July 2007. Their employer was SSEC Canada, and it is yet not clear why they weren't paid.
As a result, CNRL transferred $3.17 million to the province within the past couple of months for distribution to these workers.
“These funds are now held in a government trust account and we've begun the process of verifying individuals' identity and establishing a process for the distribution of these unpaid earnings,” said Harrison. “We want to make sure that we do exercise all due diligence to ensure that these are getting directly in the hands of those who deserve it.”
Meanwhile, he said the province will make “every reasonable effort” to collect the money from SSEC. If successful, CNRL will be reimbursed accordingly, he added.
 
So that was 2 years ago, so where do we stand today?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/02/06/sinopec-scoc-oilsands.html

A Chinese state-owned corporation wants the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn a ruling that would force it to stand trial in the deaths of two oilsands workers.
Sinopec Shanghai Engineering Company is seeking leave to appeal a Nov. 23 Alberta Court of Appeal judgment that orders the company to stand trial on 53 safety charges.
Two temporary workers from China were killed in 2007 near Fort McMurray when a storage tank collapsed at Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s Horizon project.In its appeal application, Sinopec Shanghai, which brought the workers to Alberta, argues it has no official presence in Canada.
It also says it was never properly served with legal documents in the case.
Canadian Natural Resources and SSEC Canada, a Sinopec subsidiary with just one employee, are to stand trial on the charges in October.


Perhaps Harper could order the courts drop the charges to let this company get back to work on the Gateway Project.
 
So that was 2 years ago, so where do we stand today?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/02/06/sinopec-scoc-oilsands.html

A Chinese state-owned corporation wants the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn a ruling that would force it to stand trial in the deaths of two oilsands workers.
Sinopec Shanghai Engineering Company is seeking leave to appeal a Nov. 23 Alberta Court of Appeal judgment that orders the company to stand trial on 53 safety charges.
Two temporary workers from China were killed in 2007 near Fort McMurray when a storage tank collapsed at Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.'s Horizon project.In its appeal application, Sinopec Shanghai, which brought the workers to Alberta, argues it has no official presence in Canada.
It also says it was never properly served with legal documents in the case.
Canadian Natural Resources and SSEC Canada, a Sinopec subsidiary with just one employee, are to stand trial on the charges in October.


Perhaps Harper could order the courts drop the charges to let this company get back to work on the Gateway Project.

Appalling GLG, just appalling. When it comes to the megabucks the greedy captains of industry want to make on the pipeline, life is cheap! And marine life and the ecosystem of coastal B.C. is even cheaper!!
 
And it only gets worse.....
http://m.thetyee.ca/News/2012/02/18/Sinopec/

The Sinopec File


Pollution, bribes, more. Nikiforuk pries open the record of China's oil giant, business partner for Northern Gateway pipeline.

Sinopec, Enbridge's Chinese business partner for the Northern Gateway Project, has a long record of corruption, human rights violations, environmental pollution and doing business with terrorist-linked governments.

A Tyee investigation found that the world's seventh largest corporation has been the subject of major bribery scandals at home and has systemically invested in rogue petro states from Angola to Myanmar.

The state-owned company has tried to improve its image in recent years with a series of multi-billion dollar investments in North America and the oil sands.

Yet Sinopec's earlier deals in Syria and Iran now are the subject of intense global controversy as the United States and European Union intensify sanctions against both countries.

"Today, energy is already the main driver of China's international behavior. Its energy needs have brought Beijing to turn a blind eye to human rights violations in Sudan, Myanmar and Uzbekistan," testified oil analyst Gal Luft before the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs last year. "China's energy deals with Iran have already brought Beijing to block U.S. attempts to the UN Security Council to impose crippling sanctions against Tehran for continuing to develop nuclear weapons."

Sinopec also stands accused of violating Canadian law. In 2007 the collapse of several storage tanks at Canadian Natural Resources Horizon oil sands mine site killed two temporary Chinese workers and injured several others. A subsidiary of Sinopec flew the workers in for the job yet may have defrauded many of their wages, according to the Alberta government.

Two years later, the Alberta government served Sinopec and CNRL with an unprecedented 53 charges for failing to ensure worker health and safety. (Each charge comes with a maximum fine of $500,000.) Ever since then, Sinopec has stubbornly fought the charges, saying that its subsidiary has no presence in Canada and that the charges weren't served properly.

Sinopec's legal team now wants the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn a ruling that would force it to stand trial for ignoring Alberta's health and safety regulations.

"I've been watching Sinopec ever since the tank farm collapse and nothing has lessened my concern about this company. It's not my idea of a good corporate citizen," says Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labour.

He says that Canadians should be asking if Sinopec's investments in the country are "in Canada's interest or in China's best interest?"

Biggest refinery complex in Asia

Transparency International and Revenue Watch gives Sinopec one of the lowest rankings for fighting graft and corruption (32 per cent) in their most recent report on oil companies. Sinopec ranks ninth out of 44 leading oil and gas companies.

Formed in 1998 by the Communist Party of China, Sinopec (China Petrochemical Corporation) now operates the greatest refinery complex in Asia with annual operating revenues of nearly US$290 billion and some 600,000 employees.

Yet the firm, whose 30,000 filling stations make it a familiar brand among Chinese citizens, reports meagre profits due to state subsidization of gasoline and diesel fuel prices.

Sinopec is one of three Chinese national oil companies that went public in 2000. The China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) is now the world's fifth largest oil company while Sinopec is the largest state-owned firm in terms of revenue. The China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) remains the smaller of the three monopolies.

Directors of all three companies are appointed by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) through its Organization Department, an agency created by Chairman Mao in 1924. The CCP still holds 80 per cent of the company's shares. Every executive of China's three oil monopolies are, as the Economist magazine puts it, "cadres first and company men second."

Aided by state banks that provided soft loans and supported by China's "Going Abroad" policy, Sinopec and CNCP went on a global prowl for energy to feed China's growing economy. China, the world's second largest energy consumer, now imports half its oil.

In recent years Sinopec has amassed more overseas assets (oil fields and refineries) than any other Chinese company and recently conducted more mergers and acquisitions (74 deals worth nearly $50 billion since 2004) than Exxon Mobile.

'Human rights? We care about oil'

After Canada weakened its foreign investment rules in 2010, Sinopec bought a nine per cent stake in Syncrude (Canada's largest bitumen producer) for $4.5 billion. The controversial deal gave the refining giant the right to veto any Syncrude decision on where to upgrade and refine bitumen.

Sinopec, which also partnered with Total on another oil sands project, is also a key financial backer of the Northern Gateway pipeline.

The $6-billion proposal would pump raw bitumen from Alberta to the port of Kitimat and expose the pristine waters of British Columbia's Pacific coast to massive supertanker traffic and potential oil spills.

The Canadian government backs the project, but First Nations, environment groups, labour unions and other civic groups oppose it for a variety of economic, political and environmental reasons.

But Sinopec began its dramatic climb in the global oil business by systematically acquiring assets in troubled petro states throughout Africa and the Middle East, including Myanmar, Sudan and Iran.

"No matter if it's rogue's oil or a friend's oil, we don't care," explained one Chinese energy advisor to the Washington Post in 2005. "Human rights? We don't care. We care about oil. Whether Iran would have nuclear weapons or not is not our business. America cares, but Iran is not our neighbor. Anyone who helps China with energy is a friend."

Michael Klare, a U.S. oil expert at Hampshire College, says Sinopec choose "the pariah states because that's where there was an opening. The good stuff was already locked up by western companies."

Multi-billion dollar investments in Myanmar's oil and gas fields in 2004 financially strengthened that nation's brutal military junta. Church groups and non-governmental organizations have strongly criticized CNCP and Sinopec for cooperating closely with the Burmese military rulers.

Darfur and other investments

The Sudan has been another hotspot. Sinopec's investments combined China's weapons sales to Sudan's genocidal government even prompted Harvard University to divest its stock in the company in 2006 due to "deep concerns about the grievous crisis that persists in the Darfur region of Sudan and about the role of Sinopec Corporation."

Investments in extreme political environments for oil has been part of a coordinated overseas investment strategy that often includes political support for petro states at the United Nations, says a 2007 report published in the Australian journal Security Challenges.

"China is securing deals with the kinds of sweeteners that only its state-controlled entities can provide: billions of dollars in economic and military aid; access to China's growing markets; and diplomatic support at the United Nations where China can wield its veto power in the Security Council."

In 2004, Sinopec bought $2-billion worth of oil assets in worn-torn Angola and then invested billions more in the country (China now gets third of its oil from Africa). Although western oil companies (Chevron and Exxon Mobile) and governments have benefited from rampant corruption in the petro state, Sinopec has not raised the bar.

Human Rights Watch reported in 2010: "The rise of China as Angola's main trading partner has helped the Angolan government resist reforms, not least because China and Chinese companies do not call for good governance."

In another Africa controversy, Sinopec seismic crews dynamited wildlife habitat, hunted bush meat and contaminated rivers with oil waste in Gabon's famous Loango National Park.

The incident even prompted a reprimand from the European Union. After the government of Gabon stopped the exploration program, the company explained that they were just acting like other oil companies and weren't aware of Loango's sensitive ecological status.

"China is wrecking international efforts to bring economic and political sanity to impoverished and conflict-ridden communities in Africa by bankrolling corrupt and repressive regimes," declared a 2007 report by AfricaPractice.
 
(continued from above post)

Libya, Iran and Syria

Sinopec's investments in the Libya, Iran and Syria have also drawn widespread criticism.

After Sinopec purchased $2-billion worth of heavy oil assets from a Canadian firm (Tanganyika Oil) in 2008, China has steadfastly defended the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. Last week its Security Council members blocked a UN resolution that called for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step aside.

Back in China, a country without a free press, a variety of corruption scandals and chronic environmental violations have quietly dogged the company.

In one celebrated case, a bribery scandal involving the company's former chairman Chen Tonghai put a spotlight on the extreme level of corruption in China's powerful state-owned companies.

In 2010, Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court convicted Chen, former chairman of Asia's largest oil refiner, for taking $29-million yuan in bribes (US$4 million) between 1999 and 2007. Chen allegedly helped individuals "seeking illegal interests." The verdict did not name the bribers.

According to the China Times, the Sinopec chairman confessed to his crimes and received a suspended death sentence. Sinopec did not comment on the case at the time but later urged Beijing to crack down on "corrupt" foreign business practices.

One Chinese TV report said that Chen had "taken a huge amount of bribes and abused his power to gain inappropriate benefits for his mistress. He led a decadent life, and his behavior is a severe breach of party disciplines."

A U.S. state department cable released by Wikileaks later revealed Chen's mistress had slept with several high ranking party officials and was a spy.

The promiscuous socialite had also been having affairs with several other high-level officials, including Sichuan Party Secretary and former Agricultural Minister Du Qinglin. The woman had been introduced to these men as "someone working with a Chinese military intelligence department." However, investigators now believe she is a Taiwan intelligence operative.

The company's website now says, "the Party Committee of Sinopec Group has attached great important to the development of the corruption punishment and prevention system."

After the high profile scandal, the CCP changed the leadership of all three oil companies in 2011. The current head of Sinopec, Fu Chengyu, known as Chairman Fu, served as the head of CNOOC and was a former party secretary.

But paying bribes remains such a common practice in Chinese business culture that even China's central bank admitted in 2011 that corrupt Chinese officials smuggled an estimated$123.6 billion out of the country over a 15-year period.

A 2007 Carnegie study concluded that, "The direct economic loss owing to corruption represents a large transfer of wealth -- at least three per cent of GDP per year -- to a tiny group of elites. This annual transfer, from the poorer to the richer, is fueling China's rapid increase in socioeconomic inequality and the public's perception of social injustice."

'Luxury liquors scandal'

Meanwhile, Sinopec has had other problems at home.

Most prominent was the "luxury liquors scandal." In 2011, the Guangdong office of refining giant (Guangdong Province is China's largest oil market), spent $200,000 on 50-year-old bottles of Kweichow Moutai and Chateau Latife Rothschild, at a time when ordinary Chinese faced stiff oil prices. In response, Sinopec said the purchases were part of its "normal operations."

One corporate watchdog recounted: "Sinopec's chairman stated that the public had a right to criticize Sinopec, as it is a state-owned enterprise. Meanwhile, it was reported that Sinopec Guangdong held internal meetings to discuss how the public relations department should handle media interviews and required all departments to trace the leak in order to punish the whistleblower."

Sinopec's environmental record is one of serial violations for air pollution and water contamination. It's one of 175 firms listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange that account for 750 environmental violations in mainland China, home to 16 of the world's 20 most polluted cities.

In 2007, China's top environmental agency ordered the company to suspend an oil field operations due to chronic river pollution. Sinopec refused to comment.

In another case, Sinopec added manganese at 98 times its proper concentration to one of its formula gasolines in 2010. The "problem with oil" scandal affected 900,000 tonnes of oil and damaged hundreds of vehicles.

Sinopec later reported that "the worker and involved staff accountable for the incident were severely punished afterwards. In the meantime, we formulated a long-term quality control system as precautionary approach in the future."

'Nothing short of shameful'

In Canada, Sinopec is still contesting its role in the death of two of its contract workers in the oil sands in 2007.

"It's nothing short of shameful," says McCowan of Alberta's Federation of Labour. "It's clear from our perspective that Sinopec's construction subsidiary puts its workers at risk by ignoring Alberta health and safety rules, standards codes and the rules for temporary foreign workers... If this is the future of Chinese state investment in this country, I think that Canadian workers and the Canadian public should be very concerned."

Three months after meeting with Sinopec's Chairman Fu last November, Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver launched an unprecedented attack against critics of the Northern Gateway pipeline. (Oliver made no mention of Sinopec's open flaunting of Canadian law.)

The former investment banker accused "environmentalists and other radical groups" of thwarting Canada's opportunity to diversify trade with China. The minister characterized the largely Chinese funded project as a "nation building project."

Michael Klare, a global oil and politics expert at Hampshire College in Massachusetts and author of The Race for What's Left, suspects that the Canadian government's overtures to China's national oil companies over the Northern Gateway Pipeline are all part of a coordinated chess game.

"I suspect that Harper is in league with right-wing Republicans in the United States to embarrass President Obama. Look, you are going to lose out on this democratic and wonderful Canadian oil to China and all because of Obama's extremism."

Last year, the Obama administration temporarily rejected the Keystone XL pipeline which would have pumped bitumen to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. "I think it will be one of the top three presidential election issues."

Canada's apparent embrace of China's state capitalism is "all to put pressure on Obama to give in. I don't think the Northern Gateway project is a serious, genuine play," says Klare.

Sinopec's poor record is not unique in the oil patch, even among state owned companies.

"The national oil companies are shaped by the political culture in which they originate," says Klare. "Sinopec is neither the worst nor the best of the bunch." Mexico's national oil company, Pemex, is much more corrupt, adds Klare.

Moreover, Sinopec's rapid revenue growth is a "recipe for corruption and environmental destruction, wherever it occurs."


Award-winning journalist Andrew Nikiforuk writes about energy for The Tyee and others.

Not on my watch ..... GLG
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkjIkuC_eWM

CL, here's that girl you were referring to.

I was surprised at the dichotomy between the main age groups at the rally- as GLG said, there was a strong presence of us old relics, I presume he meant inside at the hearings?

Well it was the same outside at the rally.. but the second age group that showed up to express concern ( and outrage) was the mid teens to mid 20s. After that ,there seemed to be a big gap in the middle.

Some excellent presentations, and worth standing in the cold for a couple of hours to show our disdain for the Harper govt going full bore to shove an unwanted pipeline down BCs throat...

Anyone remember the name of that 11 yr old Sliammon girl who sang so beautifully and is sure to be a future star ???
 
Rally: Sunday, April 15th. 11:30 - 4:30 pm
Thanks, Englishman !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Virtual Town Hall Meeting

There are a lot of guys on here who will be interested in this.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/174/874/126/?z00m=20312596

I have signed up because we have to keep the heat on and continue to fight this Northern Gateway pipeline. We have many allies and a bunch of environmental and first nations groups are jumping on this issue, especially the cynical attempts to abrogate and change the laws so that the pipeline approval has "plain sailing" and has unrestricted "carte blanche" to destroy BC's coastal and river environments.

The opposition in BC and across Canada is mounting and we will defeat this pipeline proposal!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Enbridge ad campaign intensifies pipeline battle

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...n-intensifies-pipeline-battle/article2447105/

The battle for the hearts and minds of British Columbians over a proposed oil pipeline has ramped up after Enbridge Inc. launched a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign – and Greenpeace Canada responded by unfurling a giant, eye-catching banner on Lions Gate Bridge.

The tactics revealed on Tuesday by the opposing sides in the debate are dramatically different.
Enbridge is going with a finely crafted print and television campaign created by Kbs+p Canada, with media relations directed by Hill and Knowlton, a leading communications company that claims to have “invented the concept of public relations.”

On the other hand, Greenpeace and others opposed to the Northern Gateway Pipeline proposal to link Alberta’s oil sands to a West Coast tanker port are going with low-budget drama, petitions and social networking.

At the same moment Paul Stanway, an Enbridge spokesman, was unveiling the advertising package in an office tower on the edge of Stanley Park, environmental activists were rappelling down the girders of the bridge on the other side of the park, just a few city blocks away.

The banner flapped in the wind briefly before the Greenpeace climbers, who had been unable to secure the lower edge, pulled it in.

Mr. Stanway said with a smile that he hadn’t had a chance to see the “no tar sands pipelines” banner, but it was clear his company is hoping the ads will have a more lasting impact.

“We need social licence to build this pipeline,” he said in explaining the need for the advertising campaign. “We need public support …This is something we’re more and more focusing on.”

The advertising campaign promises job creation, environmental protection and economic stimulus, linking it all together with a catchy tag line: “It’s more than a pipeline. It’s a path to our future.”

Mr. Stanway said Enbridge is spending “less than $5-million” on the ads, which will run in newspapers and on television over the summer starting on Wednesday, and which may later expand to radio.

He said company polls show “support for the project is around 50 per cent,” but this support is stronger in the north, along the pipeline route, than it is in the heavily urban Lower Mainland.

Until now, Enbridge has directed its public-relations efforts to the many small communities along the route, but the ad campaign is aimed at a broader audience.

“It’s become quite apparent the debate has become a province-wide issue,” Mr. Stanway said.

The project is under federal environmental review, with a decision not expected for another 18 months, but Mr. Stanway said Enbridge hopes to win over a majority of the public in the meantime.

Opponents don’t think that’s going to happen.

“You can’t buy social licence,” said Jolan Bailey, an outreach co-ordinator for Forest Ethics Advocacy.

Josh Paterson, staff counsel for West Coast Environmental Law, said 130 first nations oppose the project and ads won’t sway them.

“They can wrap every bus in every city, they can take a monopoly on all the billboards [but] it’s not going to make a lick of difference,” he said.

Melina Laboucan-Massimo, a climate and energy campaigner for Greenpeace Canada, said the banner unfurling was timed to coincide with the Enbridge announcement in a bid to blunt the ad campaign by reminding the public how strong the opposition is.

She said although the banner hung from Lions Gate for only a few hours, it drew media attention and expressed a message “that is a lot more in line with what British Columbians think.”

Ms. Laboucan-Massimo said the banner is just the start of an effort aimed at “mounting the pressure” against the pipeline.

In a related effort, LUSH Cosmetics announced on Tuesday that it is working with the NGO Dogwood Initiative to urge customers to sign anti-pipeline petitions in its 44 shops, online or by phone texting, “NOTankers.”
 
Enbridge ad campaign intensifies pipeline battle
Enbridge is going with a finely crafted print and television campaign created by Kbs+p Canada, with media relations directed by Hill and Knowlton, a leading communications company that claims to have “invented the concept of public relations".

“We need social licence to build this pipeline,” he said in explaining the need for the advertising campaign. “We need public support …This is something we’re more and more focusing on.”

The last group to use this Hill & Knowlton pr firm to bolster their social licence was the BC Salmon Farmers. $1.5 million spent.

And where are they now? Fish prices and stock prices plummenting, putting fewer smolts in the water, staff layoffs, collapsing collaborations with conservation groups willing to talk to them, a new IHN epizootic and blaming activists for breaching "biosecurity".

Money well spent?

This new Enbridge pr campaign is starting to sound like good news.
 
If they were so sure of the project they would not need to advertise it. Sounds like a weak link.

The last group to use this Hill & Knowlton pr firm to bolster their social licence was the BC Salmon Farmers. $1.5 million spent.

And where are they now? Fish prices and stock prices plummenting, putting fewer smolts in the water, staff layoffs, collapsing collaborations with conservation groups willing to talk to them, a new IHN epizootic and blaming activists for breaching "biosecurity".

Money well spent?

This new Enbridge pr campaign is starting to sound like good news.
 
The last group to use this Hill & Knowlton pr firm to bolster their social licence was the BC Salmon Farmers. $1.5 million spent.

And where are they now? Fish prices and stock prices plummenting, putting fewer smolts in the water, staff layoffs, collapsing collaborations with conservation groups willing to talk to them, a new IHN epizootic and blaming activists for breaching "biosecurity".

Money well spent?

This new Enbridge pr campaign is starting to sound like good news.

If they were so sure of the project they would not need to advertise it. Sounds like a weak link.


Let's hope so. Shooting oneself in the face is a good thing in this case for sure.
 
Back
Top