Sockeye, F/N

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
Ottawa calls on B.C. natives to ration sockeye catch

MARK HUME

E-mail Mark Hume | Read Bio | Latest Columns
April 30, 2008

VANCOUVER -- Sockeye returns to the Fraser River this summer will be so poor that the federal government has asked 94 native bands in the watershed to come up with a catch-sharing plan that, for the first time, may involve "salmon rationing."

Native leaders say such meagre catches are forecast that people who have always had sockeye as a staple of their traditional diet might not get any this summer.

"The salmon that are harvested will need to be rationed between and among the bands. And the individual bands may have to ration salmon inside their communities," said Ernie Crey, a director of the Sto:Lo Nation fisheries program.

"They will very likely be forced to create priority lists for salmon. Very likely the able-bodied will do the fishing. But the leaders may be forced to say first priority for who gets the salmon are the elderly, single moms and those on welfare," said Mr. Crey, whose organization represents about a dozen bands on the lower river.

"...The government calls it a sharing plan, but that is really a euphemism for the rationing of salmon," he said.

Although other species, such as chum and late-summer chinook, are forecast to be numerous enough to support fisheries, the loss of sockeye is a blow, because the oil-rich salmon are considered the mainstay of the native diet on the Fraser.

Early explorers told of seeing salmon-drying racks in the Fraser Canyon, where they can still be found in the summer, with families gathering to put away enough fish for a year.

"There's a great dependence on the annual sockeye run," Mr. Crey said. "The principal dietary source of protein relied upon by these 94 communities is quickly vanishing and it's alarming that there are no alternatives at hand to replace this food source."

Early predictions are for a run of about two million sockeye, which sounds like a lot of fish. But that is down considerably from the 4.4 million average for this low-cycle year and far off the river's historical annual average, for all years, of 9.7 million.

Because the run was weak four years ago, it has long been expected that commercial and recreational fishing might not be allowed in 2008.

But the Department of Fisheries and Oceans is now predicting such low returns that the aboriginal harvest of fish for food, social and ceremonial (FSC) purposes is also facing curtailment. DFO has been asking bands along the Fraser to come up with a plan to share whatever few salmon are caught.

Mr. Crey said DFO is hoping bands can work out a plan that is acceptable to everyone, reducing conflict on the river, even while stocks are plunging to extreme lows.

"It has been a very difficult exercise for all the first nations ... because they lack confidence in the [government's salmon run] forecasts," Mr. Crey said.

"Last year there was a forecast of six million [sockeye] and it came in at two million ... so we are worried it could be considerably less than [what is] being predicted now. How do we structure a plan when we don't know how many fish there will be?" he asked.

"It's a very problematic exercise. This isn't to say it can't be accomplished, because there has to be a plan ... and if we don't come up with a plan, we know they [DFO] will impose a plan."

In a letter to chiefs earlier this year, Paul Sprout, Pacific regional director general for DFO, said that reaching consensus "will be extremely challenging," but it was necessary "in a year likely to require collective action towards conservation." Mr. Sprout warned that low returns mean "all requests for FSC access cannot be fully satisfied."

Sockeye start returning in the early summer and continue running through the fall. DFO predicts the run size far in advance by using a model that considers the size of the progenitor run (the parents of this year's salmon spawned in 2004) and other things related to ocean survival.

The growth rate of salmon at sea, water temperatures, salinity levels, the breeding success of sea birds (an indication of food abundance) and the timing of zooplankton blooms are all factors.

DFO has calculated there is a 90-per-cent probability the Fraser sockeye run will be at least 1.2 million (which would mean almost no fishing), but there is a 50-per-cent probability it could reach 2.8 million (which would allow a limited harvest).

Brian Riddell, head of DFO's Pacific salmon branch, said the Fraser's sockeye run isn't the only one in poor shape this year. Wild sockeye in the Skeena have been rated as "a stock of concern," which means it is unlikely fishing will be allowed for them.

Early chinook runs to the Fraser and Thompson Rivers and to the West Coast of Vancouver Island are also of concern, as are coho in the upper Fraser, Thompson and Georgia Strait.

Dr. Riddell said on the West Coast of North America, B.C. appears to be in a transition zone between southern waters, where nearly all stocks are in peril, and the north, where salmon are doing well.
 
quote:"There's a great dependence on the annual sockeye run," Mr. Crey said. "The principal dietary source of protein relied upon by these 94 communities is quickly vanishing and it's alarming that there are no alternatives at hand to replace this food source."
Perhaps someone should suggest seal meat and oil as a replacement.
 
MP swims up stream on fisheries
RICHMOND NEWS
Jessica Kerr
Canwest News Service
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
John Cummins is concerned there are not going to be enough fish in the Fraser River for everyone, however the federal fisheries minister does not share his concern.
The Delta-Richmond East MP first voiced his concerns about salmon allocations for First Nations bands along the river last November in a letter to Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn. The letter was accompanied by a report, Review of Commercial Salmon Allocations: Impact Analysis Applying Tsawwassen Benchmark to the Fraser River Fishery, Cummins compiled.
The minister recently responded and his reaction has the veteran MP concerned. Under the treaty, which is still waiting for final approval from the House of Commons, Cummins said the Tsawwassen First Nation would be allowed more than double its current salmon allocation.
Cummins said by his calculations, if all other aboriginal claimants were given the same allocation as the TFN, it would amount to 177 per cent of the total salmon catch in the Fraser River. If that is the case, Cummins said, there would not be enough sockeye to even fulfill the First Nation allocations, let alone leave some for other commercial and recreational fishermen.
In his response, Hearn calls Cummins' analysis an overestimation and says, "Actually, the treaty process will provide certainty and predictability for all harvesters."
"It's the same old line -- there's enough fish there," said Cummins, who believes Hearn and his ministry do not understand the implications of the TFN treaty salmon allocations.
"How are you going to deny other bands?" he questioned. "There's going to be a demand for fish."
Cummins is also concerned about the whole treaty process.
"Who cut the deal? The government did not cut this deal, the negotiators did," he told the Delta Optimist last week.
He said none of the negotiators approached him, or any other elected officials, to ask their opinion or what they were hearing from their constituents. "I think that that's wrong," Cummins said.
The MP sent a letter to Hearn earlier this month, voicing his concerns about the minister's response to his analysis of the impact of the salmon allocations. In it he continued to highlight his opposition to a practice he believes will exclude other fishermen from harvesting Fraser River salmon.
"The Tsawwassen treaty and other such treaties now in negotiation segregate the fishery based on racial lines," Cummins stated in the letter to the fisheries minister.
"I know that you do not wish to be the minister responsible for setting a precedent that will exclude every Canadian except treaty signatories from access to Fraser River salmon."
© Richmond
 
I remember a time when no sport fisherman gave a damn about Sockeye why is this important to us now, I submit that it isn't not at all.
 
This is not the first Federal Minister of Fisheries to suffer from the old "Head up the butt Syndrom".
 
I agree with Dogbreath, my focus for 50 years has been Coho , with Springs secondary , Sockeye never entered my priorities , and here we go again railing against one group for the ills of the whole area , get back to the issue of looking at the whole problem without allocating blame to any cultural entity , we all had a part in this mess regardless of background.

AL
 
Back
Top