Fast response to offshore oil rig blowout too expensive? Feds think so.

Clint r

Well-Known Member
Copied this from castanets news service:

Fast response too expensive
Photo: Contributed - kuow.org
The Canadian Press - Aug 6 6:14 am
The federal government says it is agreeing to an offshore drilling plan that allows up to 21 days to bring in capping technology for a subsea well blowout because requiring a shorter response time would be too expensive for Shell Canada Ltd.
Nova Scotia environmentalists are questioning why the federal environmental protection agency has signed off on a plan that allows between 12 and 21 days for the multinational company to bring a vessel and a capping system to the Shelburne Basin offshore site, about 250 kilometres off the southwestern coast of Nova Scotia.
They are noting that the most recent U.S. ruling in Alaska requires the capping stack to be on hand for a blowout within 24 hours.
In the federal environmental assessment report of June 15, the agency states a blowout in the seven planned wells is unlikely and the project is unlikely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.
In an email sent late Wednesday night, a spokesman for Environment Canada said the Alaska plan to have a vessel and capping system on call was based on the harsh environment in the area and the long distances a vessel would have to travel to get there.
In the case of the Shelburne Basin Project, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency "accepted the proponent's view that it would be prohibitively expensive to develop this infrastructure in Atlantic Canada for exploratory work."
The Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board still has to approve the plan, which would have a ship travel to the area from Norway if initial methods to stem a blowout in the deepwater wells fail.
A spokeswoman for the agency says it expects to make a decision on the plan this fall, and it is prepared to add conditions to the exploration licence.
 
Copied this from castanets news service:

Fast response too expensive

A spokeswoman for the agency says it expects to make a decision on the plan this fall, and it is prepared to add conditions to the exploration licence.

Why are we drilling for oil and gas so far off shore at this point in time?
 
Copied this from castanets news service:

Fast response too expensive
Photo: Contributed - kuow.org
The Canadian Press - Aug 6 6:14 am
The federal government says it is agreeing to an offshore drilling plan that allows up to 21 days to bring in capping technology for a subsea well blowout because requiring a shorter response time would be too expensive for Shell Canada Ltd.
Nova Scotia environmentalists are questioning why the federal environmental protection agency has signed off on a plan that allows between 12 and 21 days for the multinational company to bring a vessel and a capping system to the Shelburne Basin offshore site, about 250 kilometres off the southwestern coast of Nova Scotia.
They are noting that the most recent U.S. ruling in Alaska requires the capping stack to be on hand for a blowout within 24 hours.
In the federal environmental assessment report of June 15, the agency states a blowout in the seven planned wells is unlikely and the project is unlikely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.
In an email sent late Wednesday night, a spokesman for Environment Canada said the Alaska plan to have a vessel and capping system on call was based on the harsh environment in the area and the long distances a vessel would have to travel to get there.
In the case of the Shelburne Basin Project, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency "accepted the proponent's view that it would be prohibitively expensive to develop this infrastructure in Atlantic Canada for exploratory work."
The Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board still has to approve the plan, which would have a ship travel to the area from Norway if initial methods to stem a blowout in the deepwater wells fail.
A spokeswoman for the agency says it expects to make a decision on the plan this fall, and it is prepared to add conditions to the exploration licence.


This total disregard to protect the environment in a commonsense way that only benefits foreign companies is what we can expect more of if we vote in another Harper pro-oil over all else govt. Think twice before you vote in the fall.
 
After seeing the problems they've had down in the gulf trying to cap an underwater blowout, it seems the decisions our federal people in power are making the last few years are pretty irresponsible. looking forward to a change at the helm this fall. I can't see Harper getting back in. Sadly, they just don't seem to get it...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top