Sport angling a runaway leader in B.C.’s fishing and aquaculture sector

J-GLOBAL

Well-Known Member
Vancouver Sun Article.
Was on the front page on the web for less than an hour before being pulled from the front page.


http://www.vancouversun.com/busines...leader+fishing+aquaculture/7949850/story.html



Recreational fishery dominates revenue generation, employment figures in new study



By Scott Simpson, Vancouver Sun


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/...lture+sector/7949850/story.html#ixzz2KepNW634


British Columbia’s recreational fishery is worth as much to the provincial economy as commercial fishing, aquaculture and fish processing combined, according to a new report from BC Stats.

The report, the first major economic review of the sector since 2007, estimates overall B.C. fisheries and aquaculture sector revenue at $2.2 billion for 2011 including $936 million contribution from recreational angling.

That boils down to a $325 million contribution to gross domestic product from the recreational sub-sector — not including spending on angling gear, boats and other vehicles — compared to $340 million in combined GDP from the commercial, aquaculture and fish processing sub-sectors including commercial boats and gear.

Within the recreational fishery, saltwater activity accounts for just over half of GDP with the remainder going to angling in lakes and streams.

Employment across the entire sector reached 13,900, 8,400 of whom worked in recreational fishing.

The B.C. Wildlife Federation, which speaks for a provincewide aggregation of sport fishing organizations, trumpeted the data as evidence that both the provincial and federal governments need to give more weight to the interests of recreational anglers and species such as salmon, halibut and trout when they’re making decisions about fisheries resource management.

For example in 2007, memos from a Fisheries and Oceans Canada manager based in Prince Rupert revealed that federal politicians “caved under pressure” from commercial fishermen and kept the Skeena River open to sockeye gillnetters during peak migration of steelhead — a sport-only salmon species prized by anglers around the world.

More recently, a conflict has emerged among recreational and commercial fishermen about harvesting halibut, with commercial halibut fishermen taking the Harper government to court over a decision to shift a small portion of their catch over to sport anglers.

“This report has established a clear need for both the provincial and federal governments to wake up to the economic importance of investing in building and maintaining sustainable recreational fisheries across British Columbia,” BCWF president Bill Bosch said in a news release.

“The best example of limited (recreational) access at the moment is the halibut fishery, where 400 commercial quota holders control 85 per cent of the total allowable catch while thousands of recreational public anglers face reduced opportunities and catch limits as they try to stay within their 15 per cent assignment,” the BCWF said.Al Martin, director of strategic initiatives for the federation, said that in light of the sector’s value to the provincial economy there is “a whole range of issues” that should be getting more attention from both levels of government.

“First is greater funding for the management and protection of fisheries resources — particularly by channelling more of the revenue generated through licenses and fees levied upon sport anglers away from general revenue,” Martin said.


“But I think the fundamental issue right at the moment is the amount of resources put into fisheries and fish habitat management. There have been some changes with Bill C-38 and (amendments to) the Fisheries Act. There are major layoffs and major reorganization going on in the federal department of fisheries and oceans which has things in transition so to speak.”

Gerry Kristianson, communications director for the Sport Fishing Institute of British Columbia, noted that most of the federal fisheries budget is dedicated to the commercial fishery in contrast with its relative value to Canada as a whole.

“If you look at the budget of the department, they spend something in the order of 90 per cent of the budget on commercial fisheries and a tiny proportion on recreational fisheries.”

Smithers Mayor Taylor Bachrach, whose northwest B.C. community considers sport fishing an essential part of the local economy, noted that the municipal council recently wrote a letter to the fisheries department calling for more balanced management decisions that will protect steelhead and other salmon species targeted by anglers including chinook and coho.

“It was great to see the report. I think it validates what we’ve known up here for a long time, which is that this is a critical sector of our economy. It definitely highlights the need to focus on habitat protection and supporting the sport fishing industry in terms of resources. I don’t think that aspect of the industry has received nearly enough resources in the past,” Bachrach said.

He noted cutbacks in the B.C. conservation officer service, for example, which leaves only two officers to serve a “huge” area in the northwestern part of the province.

ssimpson@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/...lture+sector/7949850/story.html#ixzz2KepaQ76R
 
Send it to all your MP's and MLA's.
 
Imagine how much more money we could bring in if we could get some more of the haly tac and catch and keep one over 60 lbs or if the gov would give us the funding the hatcheries need to pump some fish out like our friends next door.
 
This is exactly the info that needs to be capitalized on. It would be great to see the SFAB, SFI, BCWF, BCFF, BCSS, BCFDF and all the SFAC's grab this information an run with it to every meeting with DFO and every opportunity to the press for the next 4 years or until the next study comes out that proves this again. DFO needs to be embarrassed by the discrepancies in funding allocation between the sectors and the only way to do this is in the press.

In addition, I think the very best lobbyists should be the mayors and councils of all the small towns up and down the coast that are suffering due to the downturn in sports fishing dollars coming into their towns. Let's face it, Commie fishing is an industry of the past. It has been in decline for several decades, whereas sports fishing has grown and would continue to grow if we re-allocated federal dollars presently wasted in "management" of the commercial fleet and channeled those dollars in the right direction.

Its no wonder DFO focuses on the commie fleet. Its a matter of "Self-preservation". Cut those dollars out of the commie management sector and you essentially eliminate DFO.

If you want the public to pay attention to your 'cause' and show that it is the right thing to do, tell them where it counts - in the pocketbook. If you can't prove that the best use of the resource is sport fishing, then all you are is a bunch of "rich" whiney greedy fishermen who want more. Capitalize on this and you may have a chance to convince Joe Q Public that it is the right path.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks to me that the wisest use of the fisheries resource is in fact recreational fishing. The sooner politicians realize that fact, and restructure DFO to better support the recreational sport fishing sector the better. Way too much focus on prosecuting commercial fisheries and not enough on determining the best use of the available resource and use that to guide policy and fisheries management decisions. Couldn't agree more on the hali file - looks to me that the politicians screwed that up royally. Kemp needs to read this study in the worse way. When will they learn!
 
Fin Addict....I hope you saw that indeed the article was generated by press releases that SFI and BCWF released soon after the BC Stats report was issued. The BCWF was very quick to post a press release, and indeed Scott ( the author of this article) was quick to contact us. Indeed the BCWF is acting on the information, in fact we were part of the significant pressure on the Province to generate the report, and we are very pleased they saw the value in following through with it. This report is significant, and valuable..it will be used repeatedly to hammer home what we have been saying and presenting for some time now. BCWF has been a strong presence in fighting for all of our rights and values for some time now...once in a while it reaches the press, but be assured we are meeting MP's and MLA's regularly and fighting the fight.

traveller
 
Thanks Traveller, I know that BCWF jumps on this all the time. I actually think that the Fish and Game clubs and its reps and the SFAB does all that it can to bring this to light. Unfortunately the track record has been public interest about once a year. Will this study finally be the one that gets interest? Perhaps, but maybe it needs to grow legs with more than just the F&G crowd. Perhaps it needs to endorsement and support ofthe Fraser Institute and a collective of town mayors and provincial politicians to get the Feds to give us our Fisheries back. We all know that DFO is a broken shell of bureaucrats in Ottawa that simply are in it to preserve their fat public salaries and pensions. We need to get this to a boiling point with NON anglers who are tired of paying for all this through their taxes. Perhaps an expose' that shows how much money is wasted on commie fishing and how far we could take sport fishing and prosperity IF we focused those dollars back to the resource instead of the commercial exploitation and low dollar return of that resource. Perhaps its time for the province to lobby to take ownership of its fisheries.
 
As anglers we have known most of the information contained here for a long time. However when it comes to government it is the people who line their party pockets that get the voice when elected. It is as if we need to fund an organization that would do exactly the same thing, supply them with campaign funds. For as the old saying goes "Money talks"
 
Back
Top