Good luck proving this one. It is quite likely that the Robertson Creek Chinook enhancement represent the number of Chinook that historically returned to regional streams (other than the Stamp/Somass) in the area historically fished by the FN's in question; the single large hatchery was considered a better option than putting hatcheries on every stream in the area in order to restore Chinook populations nearer to historical numbers. Is this FN catch part of a treaty agreement? If so, does the treaty specify that enhanced Chinook are out of scope?The point is, the current chinook population is vastly in excess of anything that existed historically.
FYI I consider the Hooten info rasicst & just another post made by a predictable group of forum members making predictable comments on a predictable subject (FN fisheries).