Minister's decision on SFAB Chinook announced

Obviously there are many exasperated fishers here, including all the hardworking volunteers of the various organizations. We need all those volunteers and, although many have differing opinions on the best courses of action, all have basically the same goals and we should try to remember that. Unfortunately those goals may be difficult to ever reach because we are negotiating (fighting) with DFO, a government department that answers to only one entity. The heads of DFO must, at the end of the day, satisfy not the public fishery or the ENGOS, etc but they have to do what the federal government wants. Our Liberal government's main concern is getting and maintaining power (votes) and those votes lie principally in eastern Canada. Reconciliation is popular in large urban centers and will continue to be pushed by the Liberals to the detriment of the west coast public fishery. They simply don't care as much about west coast fishers and businesses as they do about garnering votes in Ontario and Quebec. And that's not going to change. It doesn't help either that Justin's dream is to have his portrait hanging in the halls of the U.N. Headquarters. I believe this is another reason for the strong Liberal support for UNDRIP. Whether you favor reconciliation or not, it is obvious that it hurts the goals of the public fishery. Unless things change, we will continue to see recreational fishing closures (under the guise of conservation) while the same salmon that are supposedly being protected are swimming into river gill nets.
While all of this is going on, I can't help wondering why the B.C. Provincial government is so silent and contrite about the issue of BC businesses being hurt by closures. Should they not be reminding the Feds on a constant basis about the billions of dollars that recreational fishing brings into BC?
The real reason the Province is not really concerned is fish do not garner votes.
This has been proven many times in the past.

The Feds. also know this, as this is not the east coast.

If the sports anglers in BC were as political as the commercial sector is in the east then things would be a lot different.

However, this has and will not happen, sad.
 
There is virtually no rec access to East coast fisheries, pretty much controlled by commies, which is why they’re so political, at times even violent, to protect this “gift”. Liberals using pacific salmon as a major reconciliation chip w/ FN or Conservatives/Reformers trying to convert the west coast to Eastern style commercial owned ITQ ... all the while neither party is committed to doing anything meaningful to reverse the accelerating declines. Anyway you slice it, west coast rec anglers are getting squeezed out at an accelerating rate.

Cheers!

Ukee
 
Last edited:
Why not amalgamate all the the SFAB, SPFI, BC Wildlife, BC Outdoors anyone and any firm that has a stake in this and challenge the government in court? The DFO as an office of the government has not executed its mandate to the fullest.
 
Conservation my butt! Gill nets should’ve been banned decades ago, let alone in-river when there are serious conservation concerns with multiple stocks from Interior Chinook, Coho and steelhead to white sturgeon. DFO should be charged under their own Act as well as SARA!
 
7 LEGAL openings so far this year.


Absolutely disgusting. Strictly targeting the most endangered Chinook on the coast. Perfect recipe for netting as well with the river conditions!
Very soon there will be no viable returns. Then DFO can say the stock has gone and nothing can be done.
Exactly as they have done for the Steelhead.
 
Back
Top