Interesting stats about recreational boating accidents in the US

Bryan Allen

Well-Known Member
Fishing boat accidents mixed in with the rest.... Biggest risk factor-- alcohol

2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
 In calendar year 2020, the Coast Guard counted 5,265 accidents that involved 767 deaths, 3,191 injuries and approximately $62.5 million dollars of damage to property as a result of recreational boating accidents. 

 There is evidence that boating activity rose significantly during the pandemic, from reports of increased boat sales, insurance policies taken out, insurance claims, and calls for towing assistance. The Coast Guard is analyzing variables associated with boating activity to normalize accident data. 

 Numerous states cited difficulties registering boats due to office closures during the pandemic. The Coast Guard did not perform any statistical adjustments to state figures.  The fatality rate was 6.5 deaths per 100,000 registered recreational vessels. This rate represents a 25% increase from the 2019 fatality rate of 5.2 deaths per 100,000 registered recreational vessels. 
 Compared to 2019, the number of accidents increased 26.3%, the number of deaths increased 25.1%, and the number of injuries increased 24.7%. 
 Where cause of death was known, 75% of fatal boating accident victims drowned. Of those drowning victims with reported life jacket usage, 86% were not wearing a life jacket. 
 Where length was known, eight out of every ten boaters who drowned were using vessels less than 21 feet in length. 
 Alcohol use is the leading known contributing factor in fatal boating accidents; where the primary cause was known, it was listed as the leading factor in 18% of deaths. 
 Where instruction was known, 77% of deaths occurred on boats where the operator did not receive boating safety instruction. Only 12% percent of deaths occurred on vessels where the operator was known to have received a nationally-approved boating safety education certificate. 
 There were 247 accidents in which at least one person was struck by a propeller. Collectively, these accidents resulted in 39 deaths and 241 injuries. 
 Operator inattention, operator inexperience, improper lookout, excessive speed, and machinery failure rank as the top five primary contributing factors in accidents. 
 Where data was known, the most common vessel types involved in reported accidents were open motorboats (46%), personal watercraft (22%), and cabin motorboats (13%). 
 Where data was known, the vessel types with the highest percentage of deaths were open motorboats (50%), kayaks (15%), and pontoons (9%). 
 The 11,838,188 recreational vessels registered by the states in 2020 represent a 0.34% decrease from last year when 11,878,542 recreational vessels were registered. Recreational Boating Statistics 2020
 
Trailer-able boats under 21 feet, this is the first time boat territory, which coincides with the stat for accidents from lack of training or safety course. Not really surprising, but a sad set of stats.
 
Trailer-able boats under 21 feet, this is the first time boat territory, which coincides with the stat for accidents from lack of training or safety course. Not really surprising, but a sad set of stats.
I was wondering if it was first time boat owners, or by far the most common size of boat?
 
Are these type of fatalities really accidents?
*86% with no life jacket DIED. Almost 9 out of 10!
*77% without training DIED. Almost 8 out of 10!

No training and no life jacket means you are suicidal. Your freedom of choice - go fly a flag.

But you have no right to jeopardize the lives of the SAR crews, doing their jobs, attempting to save morons.
 
Are these type of fatalities really accidents?
No training and no life jacket means you are suicidal.

But you have no right to jeopardize the lives of the SAR crews, doing their jobs, attempting to save morons.
Interesting perspective… people whose duty it is to provide assistance are doing so by their own choice and volition, nobody’s forcing them into that role or occupation; and they are now trained not to take potentially fatal risks. Some fatal and near fatal accidents involving rescuers have happened during their training. Vessels of opportunity are never compelled to assume outsized, potentially fatal risks; things can go sideways of course.

The days when ‘you have to go out; but you don’t have to come back’ are part of heritage. (Suicide implies pre-mediated intent to self harm, doesn’t it? Accidental implies unintentional or unanticipated?) Certainly many fatalities are preventable with appropriate preparation.
 
Last edited:
I was wondering if it was first time boat owners, or by far the most common size of boat?
It could be 1) the huge number of smaller boats and 2) the generally reduced survivability of smaller boats that are what drive up the tally.
One proper measure of relative safety might be the RATE of incidents per 100k hours of exposure per type of boat, in order to best be able to make apples-to-apples comparisons perhaps. (But that statistic can only ever be guesstimated probably.)
 
Last edited:
No surprise at all. Ever see anyone wearing life jackets in American boating programs or advertising? Rarely. Sometimes in Canadian programming but even that’s pretty hit and miss.
 
Interesting perspective… people whose duty it is to provide assistance are doing so by their own choice and volition, nobody’s forcing them into that role or occupation; and they are now trained not to take potentially fatal risks. Some fatal and near fatal accidents involving rescuers have happened during their training. Vessels of opportunity are never compelled to assume outsized, potentially fatal risks; things can go sideways of course.

The days when ‘you have to go out; but you don’t have to come back’ are part of heritage. (Suicide implies pre-mediated intent to self harm, doesn’t it? Accidental implies unintentional or unanticipated?) Certainly many fatalities are preventable with appropriate preparation.
Insurance policies are limited in the case of those assuming intentional risk and taking negligent actions. Taking a small boat out in poor weather qualifies for both. In the event of a fatality, the skipper could be found guilty of criminal negligence.

Your attitude toward the SAR personnel is cavalier and regrettable. I'm assuming you are the macho, Boo-Yah cheerleader in the ranks. "Heritage"? In what century are you living, dude? Or dud...
 
Insurance policies are limited in the case of those assuming intentional risk and taking negligent actions. Taking a small boat out in poor weather qualifies for both. In the event of a fatality, the skipper could be found guilty of criminal negligence.

Your attitude toward the SAR personnel is cavalier and regrettable. I'm assuming you are the macho, Boo-Yah cheerleader in the ranks. "Heritage"? In what century are you living, dude? Or dud...

Puzzled by those comments, Fox. From my standpoint as a boater and risk-taker in some other activities, anybody involved in SAR type work gets my full respect.

I just finished a book about the Coast Guard chopper guys involved in SAR work in Southeast Alaska. The phrase ...”You have to go out but you don’t have to come back...” was mentioned several times in the book and took on a tragic drama all its own in a nail-biting description of three guys in a chopper trying to get a gill netter off a boat in 40 foot seas, with the chopper finally crashing after a rotor clipped a wave.... all hands lost.....the gill netter watching the chopper sink and living to tell the tale about the terrible loss

In SARdean’s defense, that phrase was attributed to Patrick Etheridge, a Cape Hatteras Coast Guard guy who is renowned to have shouted those words to an underling when one of them insisted that he and his men might make it through the surf to get to a foundering boat, but they might not make it back.

The full phrase Etheridge was....” The Blue says we’ve got to go out and it doesn’t say a damn thing about having to come back!”..... (Blue meaning a set of published SAR instructions to Coast Guard personnel on saving lives, the instructions having been bound up in a book with a blue cover)

So given that that powerful admonition was used 100 years ago, it certainly passes the smell test of a “heritage” for anybody involved in the selfless labor of saving lives while faced with the very real risk of not coming home to tell the tale.
 
1669662928133.png


The statue outside of Coast Guard Station Quillayute River in La Push, Wash., memorializes the Coast Guardsmen who lost their lives aboard Coast Guard Motor Lifeboat 44363 on Feb. 12, 1997.​


 
That same CG station at the mouth of the Qilleyute also lost a MH-60 Jayhawk helicopter 12 years ago —-it snagged a power line and crashed into the water—-they lost 3 guys in the crash

 
Interesting perspective… people whose duty it is to provide assistance are doing so by their own choice and volition, nobody’s forcing them into that role or occupation; and they are now trained not to take potentially fatal risks. Some fatal and near fatal accidents involving rescuers have happened during their training. Vessels of opportunity are never compelled to assume outsized, potentially fatal risks; things can go sideways of course.
As a retired SAR pilot on Buffalos what you say is theoretically correct-HOWEVER in practice that is not what happens. Usually when we were called out the weather was right on limits . Very few searches ever occur in "nice " weather -we tended to always push the envelope particularly in the early hours or days of a search. You cannot always guarantee that the weather stays the same and I don't know any SAR pilot or captain that would leave people in dire straits just because things were getting" IFFY" Besides we need stories of searches that were on the CUSP for our old age--if we made it that long!! LOL
 
Back
Top