searun
Well-Known Member
Great last two posts. Every time I see searun post I cringe as he has said a cpl of times "1 daily 1 possession is looking pretty good". It is mind boggling he would post that on a public forum. No offence but that's ****ing stupid!!! Ya show dfo you think that's good...genius. I'm with the last two and we better let dfo know that's what almost all of us think and 1/1 or 1/2 with slot is not acceptable nor "looking good"
Hey, I appreciate where you are coming from. You might want to go back and re-read my post....there's nothing to negotiate if we win the Malcolm case, which I believe we have some very strong arguments in law. That was the point of the SFI and BCWF spending a ton of cash to fight this case for all rec anglers. I think we are all very encouraged by the prospects. Having said that, litigation is risky business so the outcome is uncertain.
Notwithstanding, taking that uncertainty into account we also have to start looking closely at what choices we will face if nothing changes as a result of that case. Simple math when it comes to dividing up the TAC. I prefer to hope for the best, but also plan realistically for something else in the event we are forced to do so. If anyone here thinks we are getting a full season, 2 and 3 limits with a 30% reduction in TAC over last year I got a bridge for sale. That's why we should also be thinking about what we need out of the TAC we can reasonably anticipate if this court case fails.