So some weeks ago, around about the time of the CHEK TV news story (mentioned in Hootey's post), the Goldstream Hatchery had only taken 4 chinook for brood. In 2008 217 chinook returned but this year the LGS chinook return is terrible. I haven't heard of anymore adult Goldstream chinook being taken for the hatchery by the Goldstream volunteers since, so I presume 4 is still the total. However, I did hear a report around the same time from a hatchery representative that 25 or so adult chinooks were seen (counted) in the lower Goldstream. They never showed up at the fence though as "someone else must have taken them" (was the diplomatic comment used).
Question: ... at what point is the fishery management of chinook to a "conservation concern" level going to kick in to stop "someone" from whacking almost the entire return in the river?
If chinook need to be avoided there are other species and opportunities available to harvest for FSC. Just think about all those volunteer operated conservation projects that will suffer next spring because there are virtually no chinook in the Goldstream Hatchery for enhancement.
SFBC forum member Unknown has been repeating a theme of - let's all sit down together to work this out. IMHO it's way overdue. This year we have seen mismanagement problems reported on the SFBC forum about the Somass, Cowichan and now this system. I am sure there are others.
God never did make a more calm, quiet, innocent recreation than angling - Izaak Walton