Goldstream Chum Salmon 'wiped out' by 2011 fuel spill.

Rockfish

Well-Known Member
http://www.timescolonist.com/chum-salmon-wiped-out-by-2011-fuel-spill-in-goldstream-river-1.694559

Chum salmon ‘wiped out’ by 2011 fuel spill in Goldstream River


Rob Shaw / Times Colonist
November 12, 2013 10:06 PM
Email
Print


An entire batch of chum salmon hit by a 2011 fuel spill in Goldstream Provincial Park have been “wiped out” and failed to return to spawn this year, a local hatchery says.

Three-year-old chum, which were directly affected as juveniles by the tanker truck crash and spill into Goldstream River, have not returned to the park this year to spawn because they likely died when the spill occurred, said Peter McCully of the Goldstream Hatchery.

“We were hoping that a number of them had escaped the effects of it, but its not looking like that’s the case,” McCully said. “It looks like that cohort was pretty much wiped out.”

About 43,000 litres of gasoline and 700 litres of diesel was spilled into Goldstream park and the river in April 2011 when a Columbia Fuels tanker truck crashed into a rock wall and flipped on its side.

“The three-year-olds would have been the ones most affected by the spill,” McCully said. “Their brood would have come into the river in 2010, laid their eggs, and then when the little ones came up out of the gravel in 2011 just at the same time as the fuel spill, that’s when they got whacked.”

After the spill, thousands of young chum were found dead in the river, foreshadowing the low numbers hatchery staff are now seeing return, he said.

“Those of us who spent time in the river knew it was a really serious event at the time,” McCully said. “It killed a lot of micro-organisms, the plankton, the algae, the whole food web was whacked.”

Despite the setback, the overall number of salmon spawning at Goldstream park this year is encouraging, he said.

Chum salmon spend three to five years in the ocean before returning to spawn, and there are encouraging returns this year for four- and five-year-old chum salmon. There are also good numbers of coho in Goldstream and other South Island watersheds, McCully said.

Coho salmon showed the effects of the fuel spill last year, when most of the tagged fish released before the spill didn’t return, McCully said. The hatchery delayed the release of other juvenile cohos for two months after the spill, and those fish did fairly well. Last year was one of the best coho returns in a decade at the park.

Columbia Fuels has spent more than $2 million in cleanup efforts at Goldstream Park. The truck driver pleaded guilty in 2012 to dangerous driving and violating the Fisheries Act and received a three-month conditional sentence, with 200 hours of community service in fish conservation.

The B.C. government continues to monitor remediation efforts at the park.

Generally, there’s little to no contamination in surface water, said Graham Knox, manager of the Ministry of Environment’s environmental emergency program. However, the concentration in groundwater occasionally exceeds provincial standards, and there remains fuel north of the spill site, he said.

“We don’t think there’s any impact on the fish or the critters,” he said. “This is something in the soil.”

rshaw@timescolonist.com

© Copyright 2013
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wasn't the truck driver drunk? Or am I thinking of another massive gas spill?
 
If you think this is bad just wait until there is a oil super tanker spill on the coast!!! All sorts of marine, shore and bird life will be wiped out, not just one years run of chum salmon. Take the worst oil spill in history and multiply it by at least 10 and that's the level of environmental damage we will have. The tar sands dilbit oil is very hard to clean up as it doesn't float on the surface as it is heavier and it sinks to the bottom where it remains toxic and polluting for decades. We have no idea of how bad it could be. If you don't want this to happen fight then please join the fight against the Northern Gateway Pipeline.

If we don't work against it, it will be most certainly be built and it will be just a matter of time with the amounts they will ship each year before we have a very nasty oil spill (whether by tanker or rail). Please don't sit back and think it won't happen, or somehow the First Nations will be able to stop it. the only thing that will stop it is for enough concerned citizens to make this politically too painful for Harper and Co. to proceed with it.

NOW is the time to start working against this very serious danger to the environment. Please consider supporting and/or joining organizations who are working against this pipeline being built, such as:

http://www.forestethics.org/take-action?gclid=CMirhprj4roCFeYWMgodCzQA5A
http://www.leadnow.ca/canadas-interests
http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/Energy/tarsands/Get-involved/stop-the-pipeline/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Peop...hern-Gateway-Pipeline-Project/111014132260908
http://dogwoodinitiative.org/no-tankers/petition
http://www.georgiastrait.org/?q=node/973

to name just a few...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you think this is bad just wait until there is a oil super tanker spill on the coast!!! All sorts of marine, shore and bird life will be wiped out, not just one years run of chum salmon. Take the worst oil spill in history and multiply it by at least 10 and that's the level of environmental damage we will have. The tar sands dilbit oil is very hard to clean up as it doesn't float on the surface as it is heavier and it sinks to the bottom where it remains toxic and polluting for decades. We have no idea of how bad it could be. If you don't want this to happen fight then please join the fight against the Northern Gateway Pipeline.

If we don't work against it, it will be most certainly be built and it will be just a matter of time with the amounts they will ship each year before we have a very nasty oil spill (whether by tanker or rail). Please don't sit back and think it won't happen, or somehow the First Nations will be able to stop it. the only thing that will stop it is for enough concerned citizens to make this politically too painful for Harper and Co. to proceed with it.

NOW is the time to start working against this very serious danger to the environment. Please consider supporting and/or joining organizations who are working against this pipeline being built, such as:

http://www.forestethics.org/take-action?gclid=CMirhprj4roCFeYWMgodCzQA5A
http://www.leadnow.ca/canadas-interests
http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/Energy/tarsands/Get-involved/stop-the-pipeline/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Peop...hern-Gateway-Pipeline-Project/111014132260908
http://dogwoodinitiative.org/no-tankers/petition
http://www.georgiastrait.org/?q=node/973

to name just a few...


Fire it up people!
 
Thought there was an event for this Saturday.
Something to do with letting the politicians know where we stand.
Anybody have a link with details?
 
This thread is about goldstream guys don't we have enough threads about the pipeline?

Goldstream was stacked with cars on the weekend and I even saw a salmon thrashing as I drove by. There was a seagull on every rock. This is an important park to the lower island and I hope it recovers. Nature must have known humans were idiots and thankfully they built a protection system where fish come back as 3,4 and 5 year olds. The run can rebuild (again).
 
oops sorry.. your right GDW and thanks fishnwhenican for the link.
I had a chance to take a tour of this system by the folks that run the hatchery.
It was before the spill and all I can say what a beautiful river it is.
Lot's of dedicated people giving their time to protect it and help it along.
I sure hope the salmon recover and wish the folks there all the best.
GLG
 
What they should have done is "RE STOCKED" and got eggs from another hatchery so this run wouldn't have become extinct charged the whole thing to company, and to the dumbass that was drunk carrying that much fuel. This is no different then any other, if he plowed into a building im sure that building would have been rebuilt better than it was before...... do the same to the river ....rebuild it!!!!! period
SAD to see how government doesn't give a shiat about our water systems.......
 
That's a great point Wolf if it was a building, a bridge or even a monument it would be re built bigger and better. Not only was this a river this is a provincial park!
 
I recall seeing "someone" cleaning a load of Chums at a "marina" believe he said they were from Goldstream
 
It's not quite that easy. The spill occurred in spring when the fry were released. There are no more eggs anywhere as they are all hatched by that time. Also, it's not so simple to just take eggs or fry from any other stream somewhere. Genetics play an important role. For instance you could probably throw millions upon millions of fry from Robertson Cr hatchery in the Cowichan and none would come back. It is always better to rebuilt with local genes as long as you have some.
 
Chris they "swap" eggs all the time they sell them to go to other rivers etc Correct me if Im wrong but Esq gets there eggs from nitnat, they come back to where the water they grew up in. simply put its tragic on how they handled it.....
 
Well the "handling" of it shouldn't be finished yet. IMO trying to re stock just after the oil spill would be a waste of money. Step 1 is clean up the oil. Step 2 is restore the river bed, banks etc. as much as possible. Step 3 would be work on re populating that run and IMO that additional enhancement should be taking place this year, next year and the year after now that the pollution has been cleaned.

It would make no sense to rush out and get additional salmon fry to release into the river just after the spill occurred they would all just die like the fish that were already there. So HOPEFULLY the remediation isn't yet complete.
 
Chris they "swap" eggs all the time they sell them to go to other rivers etc Correct me if Im wrong but Esq gets there eggs from nitnat, they come back to where the water they grew up in. simply put its tragic on how they handled it.....

yep wolf is right on this one, Nile gets there fish from the quinsam hatchery, as do other net pen projects. the fish go were they are raised
 
It's a SAD day when a drunk driver can wipe out a run of fish. I agree the Company should be held accountable for putting a that lose nut behind the wheel in the first place.. It should be their bill to pay!
 
James Allan Smith, BC Diesel-Spill Driver Avoids Jail Time




VICTORIA - A 35-year-old fuel truck driver who crashed his rig on the Malahat Highway north of Victoria last year has been given a conditional sentence for dangerous driving.
Nanaimo, B.C., resident James Allan Smith was handed the three month conditional term and nine months probation after pleading guilty to the driving offence and also to one count of violating the Fisheries Act.
No one was hurt, but the incident dumped more than 40,000 litres of gasoline and hundreds of litres of diesel into the Goldstream River, killing thousands of juvenile chum and coho salmon.
It also caused chaos for travellers up and down Vancouver Island because the only highway leading north from Victoria was blocked for almost 24 hours.
In addition to the conditional sentence, Smith's licence is suspended for another year, on top of the two year suspension imposed after the crash, he must perform 200 hours of community service and seek drug and alcohol counselling.
Witnesses described seeing the fully-loaded Columbia Fuels tandem tanker travelling erratically along the highway on April 16, 2011, before crashing and rolling, splitting one of the tanks and sending fuel gushing toward the river just metres away.
 
So who is right? Well they are both right.
If you take eggs from another system those fish will come back to the river you put them in.
The problem is those adults may or may not have their offspring survive to repopulate the system.
Sure some may survive but over time they will not rebuild.
We learned that lesson in the 50-60's with Chinook here at the Puntledge River.
They tried many other river system Fall Chinook until they found a strain that took.
It is way better to use the original salmon to rebuild then just importing eggs from another river.
It has to do with the genetics that have had thousands of years to adapt to that river.

Now if it's just a fishery that you are trying to get or nutrients back to the river then have at her.
We do that all the time but it mostly doesn't work for rebuilding a salmon run.
You will have to continue to import your eggs forever if that's what you want.
Seems to me that you can't do that long term.
Better to work with nature then to try to force our ideas on her.

Others may have better insight but that's the way I understand it.
 
Join and Enhancement Group!!!

Some good points raised here.

All sorts of salmon enhancement practices that were used in the past have now been shown to have drawbacks. Examples include moving fish from system to system, breeding one male with large numbers of females, taking broodstock all from the front end of the run, not using Jacks to fertilize a proportion of the eggs, selecting only large fish etc....

Some folks would recommend that enhancement using hatcheries should be thrown out all together. Others would advocate not throwing the baby out with the bathwater and continuing to use hatchery enhancement, based on sound scientific principles, when and where it is justified.

How this relates to the discussion..... Filling in the missing Goldstream year class with fish from another system would not be recommended or permitted as a significant proportion of Chum return as 3, 4 and 5 year olds. This means that this year the 4 and 5 year olds, next year the 3 and 5 year olds, and the following year the 3 and 4 year olds will return and spawn, filling the brood year gaps created by the spill. Using fish from another system introduces different genetics, it is generally only a good practice when trying to bring back a run that has been wiped out completely (for example, Goldstream Coho and Chum are used to try to bring back runs to the various urban and suburban streams of the greater Victoria area). Even in such cases, it is good practice to use stock from a nearby system with similar characteristics.

One of the cases mentioned above, the out-planting of Nitinat Chinook to the net pen in Esquimalt, is an unusual case. This is essentially a put and take fishery rather than an enhancement measure. It is likely that this program only continues because the precedent has been set and ending it would upset those who target these fish when they return.

I highly recommend anyone interested in these issues looks into becoming involved in local enhancement groups. The Goldstream Volunteer Salmon Enhancement Association runs the Goldstream Hatchery is one of the largest groups around they do tonnes of good work. There are others too such as Penninsula Streams, the Sooke Hatchery Group and on and on. I ran into the guys from the Bush Creek Hatchery the other day collecting broodstock from one of the small Ladysmith Area Streams, another volunteer effort (and they confirmed that only fish raised from broodstock from each small system are stocked into that system). So where ever you are, get out there and find out about these groups.

There are often strong and angry opinions expressed on this forum about what should be done or why nothing is being done about this or that issue. Actions speak louder than words and rolling up your sleeves in a stream is a lot more rewarding than trashing the usual targets on an internet forum. Community groups also provide a great opportunity to learn more salmon biology and talk fishing.

If anyone wants more info please send a PM
 
Thank bugs hope that makes more sense to all good post.....
 
Back
Top