Plan to Feed Endangered Orcas Moving Forward!

Whole in the Water

Well-Known Member
Article from today's CBC national news. OK article, but they got the location of the smolts to be used wrong! The smolts are to come from the Nitinat hatchery, NOT Port Alberni. The Nitinat chinook have been approved for use in other local hatcheries for years now.

The issues about mixing wild and hatchery stocks is bogus IMO as this has been the case for 40 years now, with the US producing 70 million hatchery chinook a year. If it wasn't for this who knows where the orcas would be now. This SVIAC project will start with 200,000 and plans to go up to 2,000,000 in the next few years. With a reasonable survival rate of 1-2% that is 20,000 to 40,000 additional chinook in Sooke!

Totally agree the the best long term solution is to increase stocks on the Fraser River - not an impossible task if we get enough stakeholder support with a well thought out plan.

I hear that there is a Town Hall style meeting being planned in Sooke to discuss the SVIAC Sooke Chinook project on July 12, I imagine details will be coming out very shortly so stay tuned if you want to attend.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/bc-orcas-salmon-feeding-program-1.3661747

Anglers' plan to feed endangered B.C. orcas given green light, but met with some criticism
Vancouver Island fishermen's group says it has approval to deliver chinook salmon to endangered killer whales
By Belle Puri, Chris Corday, CBC News Posted: Jul 02, 2016 5:00 AM PT Last Updated: Jul 02, 2016 7:30 AM PT

A study released earlier this year says the diet of southern resident killer whales is more than 98 per cent chinook salmon. So a group of Vancouver Island fishermen are hoping to boost stocks for the West Coast's struggling orca pods. (Vancouver Aquarium/NOAA/Jamie Lusch)

Orca Baby Boom: Their fragile first year 10:45

Orca_baby_thumbnail.jpg

  • External Links
(Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external links.)

A group of fishermen in British Columbia say the federal government has given it the green light for a project designed to feed endangered killer whales. But it's a unique plan that not everyone supports.

In summer, southern resident killer whales usually travel around the inland waterways of B.C.'s Strait of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia.

The J, K, and L-pod orcas are massive, majestic and endangered. They're also an important part of B.C.'s identity and tourism industry. But their numbers have dwindled to only 83 whales despite several new births in the last year.

orca-j54-and-j28.jpg

Newborn orca J54 swims alongside its mother, J28, in Haro Strait in this 2015 file photo. (Dave Ellifrit/Center for Whale Research)

According to a study released earlier this year, more than 98 per cent of the whales' summer diet is chinook salmon, a stock also struggling along many areas of the West Coast.

So for the past two years, fishermen at the south end of Vancouver Island have had a somewhat wild plan in the works. They want to feed the whales by releasing young chinook salmon into the water.

"They're the top of the food chain in the marine environment. Them not being well is an indication that the whole of the marine environment isn't doing well," said Christopher Bos, president of the South Vancouver Island Anglers Coalition.

"If it's their preferred food that needs to be boosted, we as a society need to get on it and do it."

graphic.jpg

Over the past few decades, the number of southern resident orcas has been as low as 70. Scientists say there are currently 83 members of the pods. (CBC)

The group says the Department of Fisheries and Oceans has given it the green light to buy and raise chinook at a hatchery in Port Alberni, B.C.

When they reach the correct size, the fish will be trucked to the Sooke River, near Victoria, for release. The fish will be tagged so their travel in the ocean can be tracked.

"Then DNA samples, scat samples, from the killer whales can be identified to see if those fish are being used in the opportunity of putting more food in the water for those southern killer whales," said Bos.

Conservation group opposes plan
The Raincoast Conservation Foundation is opposed to the idea and foundation biologist Misty MacDuffee says she is shocked DFO approved the plan. There are problems integrating hatchery salmon with wild salmon, she says.

"Competition on feeding grounds, dilution of gene pool on spawning grounds," MacDuffee said. "There's all sorts of subtle ways that hatchery and wild fish interact — and that usually comes with a cost to the wild fish."

fishing-guides-20120820.jpg

A recreational fisherman holds a 24-pound chinook salmon he caught during a guided fishing tour. (The Canadian Press/Darryl Dyck)

But Bos disagrees.

"One of the unique things about doing this in the Sooke area is a lot of the things that would be related to genetic diversity, related to the transplanting of fish from different systems, none of that has any major bearing on the Sooke initiative," said Bos.

"A lot of those sort of scientific hurdles have been worked through just by the sheer fact that it's a unique environment and we can do this without any serious harm to any others stocks on the coast."

Fraser River restoration as key?
The Centre for Whale Research in Washington State has studied southern resident orcas for over four decades.

'Restoration of wild chinook stocks in the Fraser River is really what is needed...'- Ken Balcomb, Center for Whale Research

Executive Director Ken Balcomb says anglers have been trying to put more chinook in the Sooke River for several years, but mostly for the benefit of sports fishermen, not killer whales.

In a written statement, Balcomb said that "...restoration of the wild chinook stocks in the Fraser River system is really what is needed to feed the whales. The Fraser is much larger and potentially a much greater producer of salmon than any of the Vancouver Island rivers."

The fishermen's project will be privately funded, with the first year costing $50,000, mostly to tag the fish. The anglers will release their first batch of 200,000 chinook next May.

orca-babies.jpeg

Orca calf J50 is shown breaching in Swanson Channel, off Pender Island, B.C., last March. (Capt. Simon Pidcock/Ocean EcoVentures)
 
Last edited:
While it is admirable to protect the killer whale population, raising "feed stock"is not the answer in my opinion. Given the chart data in the article, 83 is about the average over the 45 year span. Let Mother Nature take it's course. We should be doing more to avoid interference then directly intervening.

When we start to artificially produce more food stock to benefit a certain species, we tend to cause other problems with a completely different species. When you start "feeding" the whales, you will also affect the current population of other marine predators such as seals and sea lions because there is a greater food source, there by artificially creating more competition for the the whales you are trying to help. It works the same way in all fish population, add more predators and the food supply for another marine species is affected. The food source you introduce keeps the same animals in the area where they are in the greatest danger of human interaction. That being a very busy and congested waterway.

If we accidentally introduce some sort of bug/virus into their food chain, our kindness just might be their demise and cause irreparable harm to the eco-chain.

You can see that just about everyday here on Vancouver Island where we have deer populations that run around our towns. We don't discourage it but when other natural predators start to enter our towns to hunt these animals, the panic arises and another animal is for the most part destroyed. If we try to "cull" the herd, then we hear from another group, but either way, we mess with the natural balance of the world and seem to create more problems then get solved.

We should all do our best to protect our lands and waterways, but when you try and artificially help wild animals, there is always some trade off.

Just my 2 cents.
 
While it is admirable to protect the killer whale population, raising "feed stock"is not the answer in my opinion. Given the chart data in the article, 83 is about the average over the 45 year span. Let Mother Nature take it's course. We should be doing more to avoid interference then directly intervening.

When we start to artificially produce more food stock to benefit a certain species, we tend to cause other problems with a completely different species. When you start "feeding" the whales, you will also affect the current population of other marine predators such as seals and sea lions because there is a greater food source, there by artificially creating more competition for the the whales you are trying to help. It works the same way in all fish population, add more predators and the food supply for another marine species is affected. The food source you introduce keeps the same animals in the area where they are in the greatest danger of human interaction. That being a very busy and congested waterway.

If we accidentally introduce some sort of bug/virus into their food chain, our kindness just might be their demise and cause irreparable harm to the eco-chain.

You can see that just about everyday here on Vancouver Island where we have deer populations that run around our towns. We don't discourage it but when other natural predators start to enter our towns to hunt these animals, the panic arises and another animal is for the most part destroyed. If we try to "cull" the herd, then we hear from another group, but either way, we mess with the natural balance of the world and seem to create more problems then get solved.

We should all do our best to protect our lands and waterways, but when you try and artificially help wild animals, there is always some trade off.

Just my 2 cents.

How is it a different species?
 
Having a fin on back doesn't mean anything. Some hatcheries don't even clip them. I would guess most of them hatchery. And doesn't a hatchery fish just live in wild. These kinds of debates are what sets back using hatcheries here. Look at Sooke. What kind of coho fishery we would have without hatcheries? Sorry I just don't see how we can save wild fish at this point.

I think this article is more of I wanted to be involved but wasn't. If the conservation group wants to give a solution with money we are all ears. I think its tacky to blast off something with media when at least someone is trying to help.
 
I agree SV, doing little when we see a declining, negative trend that is a lose/lose situation for orcas, salmon and fishers is no solution. My 2 cents.
 
I agree SV, doing little when we see a declining, negative trend that is a lose/lose situation for orcas, salmon and fishers is no solution. My 2 cents.

Here maybe we put this marking Hatch vs wild debate to bed. From Columbia River research read page 26. It clearly says majority of fish are hatchery, and they also have a mix that are unmarked. This makes up a lot of our runs in Sooke. We just assume fish our wild because it has an adipose fin. Look at that number >70% hatchery.

http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/OHRC/docs/2013/Hatchery and Wild Fish in the Columbia River Estuary.pdf
 
Back
Top