1
Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, November 10, 2008
Contact: Ms. Jennifer Gilden, Communications Officer, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
Dr. Donald McIsaac, Executive Director, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ADOPTS SWEEPING CHANGES TO
WEST COAST COMMERCIAL GROUNDFISH TRAWL FISHERIES
Portland, OR. – At its meeting in San Diego last week, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council revamped West Coast commercial groundfish fishery management by adopting
a system of individual fishing quotas, or IFQs, for the shoreside trawl fishery, and a
system of structured harvest co#8208;operatives for the at#8208;sea whiting fishery1. These two
commercial fisheries are the largest on the West Coast, with an annual dockside value
of about $61 million in recent years.
Over 100 people provided testimony on the decision, which was made around 9:30 p.m.
on Friday, November 7. Those testifying included fishermen, processors, fishing and
processing family members, port authorities, conservation group members, and local
government officials. The Council also reviewed hundreds of written comments,
including testimony from state and Federal elected officials.
The Council’s decisions will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for
approval and incorporation into Federal law.
These sweeping changes, known as trawl rationalization, were made to achieve
conservation goals and improve the economic status of these large commercial fisheries.
The West Coast trawl fishery is currently managed through a complex system of fleetwide
two#8208;month cumulative landing limits, harvest guidelines and quotas, area
restrictions, seasonal closures, gear restrictions, and frequent in#8208;season adjustments.
This system has resulted in a fishery many believe is economically unsustainable and
plagued by undesirable levels of bycatch (bycatch are fish that are not kept or sold, but
are discarded, usually at sea).
1 The shoreside trawl fishery operates out of West Coast fishing communities to catch a range of
groundfish species, including whiting. The at#8208;sea whiting fishery is centered around motherships and
catcher#8208;processors that primarily operate and process whiting at sea.
2
The rationalization program includes quotas for individual vessels, as opposed to the
fishing fleet as a whole. The new provisions mandate 100 percent observer coverage for
better catch accounting, provide for safer fishing at sea, allow commercial fishermen to
switch to more environmentally benign gear types, reduce wasteful catch practices, and
improve the overall economic benefit of the fishery.
There are currently around 140 limited entry trawl vessels active in any one year on the
west coast, spread across four distinct trawl sectors. Trawlers pull nets through the
ocean, in contrast to trollers, which use hook#8208;and#8208;line gear. The rationalization program
applies to groundfish limited entry trawlers, whiting catcher#8208;processors, and to whiting
mothership processors2. The Council manages over 90 different groundfish species that,
with a few exceptions, live on or near the bottom of the ocean, including rockfish,
flatfish, roundfish (such as whiting), sharks, and skates.
IFQs
An IFQ is a Federal permit to harvest a quantity of fish, usually a percentage of the total
allowable catch in the fishery. It is a revocable privilege, not a property right. While the
initial allocation of IFQ will go to vessel permit owners and processors, the IFQ may be
subsequently transferred, leased, or sold to captains, crew, communities, processors,
environmental groups, or other entities. Harvest privileges can also be revoked if the
IFQ holder does not comply with Federal fishing standards.
IFQs introduce harvester accountability into the fishery management system and
provide incentives to minimize catch of protected species. With IFQs, harvesters can
catch more healthy stocks if they avoid protected species. Harvesters will also have
more flexibility to choose when they fish, operating in a safer, more efficient manner
and optimizing the timing of their deliveries to coincide with market needs. This system
will end the so#8208;called “race for fish” in the whiting fishery, where harvesters compete
with one another to catch as many fish as possible during a short time.
Under the rationalization program adopted by the Pacific Council, the shoreside
whiting and nonwhiting sectors will be merged into a single sector and managed with
IFQs. All vessels will be required to carry government#8208;certified observers, improving
catch estimates for all species.
2 The whiting fishery has three sectors. The shore#8208;based sector is made up of vessels that deliver their catch
to coastal communities. The catcher#8208;processor sector is composed of relatively large vessels of several
hundred feet in length that harvest and process whiting at sea. The mothership sector is composed of
motherships that process whiting delivered by catcher vessels at sea. Motherships do not harvest
whiting themselves, but act as floating processors.
3
Without strict controls on quota ownership, IFQs can lead to the concentration of
harvest privileges in the hands of a few large operators. Because of this, the program
recommended by the Council includes accumulation limits to ensure that such
concentration does not occur. Nevertheless, one of the program’s goals is to increase the
efficiency of the fleet. As a result of rationalization, inefficient vessels are expected to
leave the fishery, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of trawl vessels
operating on the west coast. Harvesters who do not engage in fishing or who leave the
fishery will be able to lease or sell their IFQ, receiving some compensation for exiting
the fishery.
IFQ programs have been successfully used to rationalize fisheries for Alaska halibut
and sablefish, surf clams and ocean quahogs off the Mid#8208;Atlantic states, wreckfish in
the South Atlantic, and the West Coast limited entry fixed gear sablefish fishery. IFQs
are also used in New Zealand, Australia, and Iceland. IFQ program specifics vary
considerably, depending on the fishery in which they are used and the regulations for
each program.
Co#8208;ops
Besides IFQs, the rationalization program also includes harvest co#8208;ops for the
mothership and catcher processor sectors of the whiting fishery. The whiting fishery is a
high#8208;volume, low cost#8208;per#8208;pound fishery that accounts for approximately 60% of the
value of the West Coast commercial groundfish trawl fishery (including the shoreside
fishery).
A co#8208;op is a mutual arrangement among vessels in which members are allocated a
percentage of the allowable catch (similar to IFQs), but only if they pool their shares
collectively (form a cooperative). Co#8208;ops have many of the same benefits as IFQs
because they impose individual accountability and have the same level of catch
monitoring as IFQs. Co#8208;ops are expected to result in lower levels of bycatch and fewer
encounters with depleted species than under existing conditions.
Like IFQs, the proposal for at#8208;sea whiting co#8208;ops includes accumulation limits in order
to distribute activity among more participants. The co#8208;op program for the mothership
whiting fishery would also limit the number of processing vessels (motherships) able to
receive fish at#8208;sea from catcher vessels.
Co#8208;ops have been implemented in several other U.S fisheries and currently exist in the
Bering Sea crab fishery and the Alaska pollock fishery, which are managed by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
4
Economic Impacts
The economic impacts of rationalization will vary among communities. Community
impacts will depend on the level and distribution of fleet consolidation, the economic
efficiency of operations in individual ports, and each community’s proximity to highbycatch
fishing areas. Overall, the number of jobs in the trawl sector is expected to
decline as less efficient vessels leave the fishery; however, the remaining jobs are
expected to be more stable and earn higher wages.
The rationalization program includes an adaptive management provision for the
shoreside non#8208;whiting sector. Under this provision, a percentage of the IFQ will be set
aside and may be used to encourage harvesters to stay with the same ports and
processors, to aid community and regional development, to create incentives for gear
switching, to mitigate unforeseen circumstances of rationalization, to promote
sustainable fishing practices, and to facilitate new entrants to the fishery.
Process
The potential value of IFQs for management was identified in the Council’s 2000
Strategic Plan. Subsequently, the Council and its advisory bodies have been actively
considering whether to rationalize the fishery since November, 2003. The Council has
considered input from its advisory bodies (which include representatives of the fishing
industry, processors, conservation organizations, and agencies); from the public; and
from state and Federal agencies. National Marine Fisheries Service will review the
Council’s recommendation for final approval and implementation into Federal law. A
fully rationalized fishery is not expected to be in place before January 1, 2011.
During their meeting in San Diego, the Council discussed many details related to
rationalization, including which species to manage under the rationalization program;
the number of shoreside sectors; how to involve processors; formulas for initially
allocating quota shares; accumulation limits; area management; the adaptive
man1
Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, November 10, 2008
Contact: Ms. Jennifer Gilden, Communications Officer, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
Dr. Donald McIsaac, Executive Director, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ADOPTS SWEEPING CHANGES TO
WEST COAST COMMERCIAL GROUNDFISH TRAWL FISHERIES
Portland, OR. – At its meeting in San Diego last week, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council revamped West Coast commercial groundfish fishery management by adopting
a system of individual fishing quotas, or IFQs, for the shoreside trawl fishery, and a
system of structured harvest co#8208;operatives for the at#8208;sea whiting fishery1. These two
commercial fisheries are the largest on the West Coast, with an annual dockside value
of about $61 million in recent years.
Over 100 people provided testimony on the decision, which was made around 9:30 p.m.
on Friday, November 7. Those testifying included fishermen, processors, fishing and
processing family members, port authorities, conservation group members, and local
government officials. The Council also reviewed hundreds of written comments,
including testimony from state and Federal elected officials.
The Council’s decisions will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for
approval and incorporation into Federal law.
These sweeping changes, known as trawl rationalization, were made to achieve
conservation goals and improve the economic status of these large commercial fisheries.
The West Coast trawl fishery is currently managed through a complex system of fleetwide
two#8208;month cumulative landing limits, harvest guidelines and quotas, area
restrictions, seasonal closures, gear restrictions, and frequent in#8208;season adjustments.
This system has resulted in a fishery many believe is economically unsustainable and
plagued by undesirable levels of bycatch (bycatch are fish that are not kept or sold, but
are discarded, usually at sea).
1 The shoreside trawl fishery operates out of West Coast fishing communities to catch a range of
groundfish species, including whiting. The at#8208;sea whiting fishery is centered around motherships and
catcher#8208;processors that primarily operate and process whiting at sea.
2
The rationalization program includes quotas for individual vessels, as opposed to the
fishing fleet as a whole. The new provisions mandate 100 percent observer coverage for
better catch accounting, provide for safer fishing at sea, allow commercial fishermen to
switch to more environmentally benign gear types, reduce wasteful catch practices, and
improve the overall economic benefit of the fishery.
There are currently around 140 limited entry trawl vessels active in any one year on the
west coast, spread across four distinct trawl sectors. Trawlers pull nets through the
ocean, in contrast to trollers, which use hook#8208;and#8208;line gear. The rationalization program
applies to groundfish limited entry trawlers, whiting catcher#8208;processors, and to whiting
mothership processors2. The Council manages over 90 different groundfish species that,
with a few exceptions, live on or near the bottom of the ocean, including rockfish,
flatfish, roundfish (such as whiting), sharks, and skates.
IFQs
An IFQ is a Federal permit to harvest a quantity of fish, usually a percentage of the total
allowable catch in the fishery. It is a revocable privilege, not a property right. While the
initial allocation of IFQ will go to vessel permit owners and processors, the IFQ may be
subsequently transferred, leased, or sold to captains, crew, communities, processors,
environmental groups, or other entities. Harvest privileges can also be revoked if the
IFQ holder does not comply with Federal fishing standards.
IFQs introduce harvester accountability into the fishery management system and
provide incentives to minimize catch of protected species. With IFQs, harvesters can
catch more healthy stocks if they avoid protected species. Harvesters will also have
more flexibility to choose when they fish, operating in a safer, more efficient manner
and optimizing the timing of their deliveries to coincide with market needs. This system
will end the so#8208;called “race for fish” in the whiting fishery, where harvesters compete
with one another to catch as many fish as possible during a short time.
Under the rationalization program adopted by the Pacific Council, the shoreside
whiting and nonwhiting sectors will be merged into a single sector and managed with
IFQs. All vessels will be required to carry government#8208;certified observers, improving
catch estimates for all species.
2 The whiting fishery has three sectors. The shore#8208;based sector is made up of vessels that deliver their catch
to coastal communities. The catcher#8208;processor sector is composed of relatively large vessels of several
hundred feet in length that harvest and process whiting at sea. The mothership sector is composed of
motherships that process whiting delivered by catcher vessels at sea. Motherships do not harvest
whiting themselves, but act as floating processors.
3
Without strict controls on quota ownership, IFQs can lead to the concentration of
harvest privileges in the hands of a few large operators. Because of this, the program
recommended by the Council includes accumulation limits to ensure that such
concentration does not occur. Nevertheless, one of the program’s goals is to increase the
efficiency of the fleet. As a result of rationalization, inefficient vessels are expected to
leave the fishery, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of trawl vessels
operating on the west coast. Harvesters who do not engage in fishing or who leave the
fishery will be able to lease or sell their IFQ, receiving some compensation for exiting
the fishery.
IFQ programs have been successfully used to rationalize fisheries for Alaska halibut
and sablefish, surf clams and ocean quahogs off the Mid#8208;Atlantic states, wreckfish in
the South Atlantic, and the West Coast limited entry fixed gear sablefish fishery. IFQs
are also used in New Zealand, Australia, and Iceland. IFQ program specifics vary
considerably, depending on the fishery in which they are used and the regulations for
each program.
Co#8208;ops
Besides IFQs, the rationalization program also includes harvest co#8208;ops for the
mothership and catcher processor sectors of the whiting fishery. The whiting fishery is a
high#8208;volume, low cost#8208;per#8208;pound fishery that accounts for approximately 60% of the
value of the West Coast commercial groundfish trawl fishery (including the shoreside
fishery).
A co#8208;op is a mutual arrangement among vessels in which members are allocated a
percentage of the allowable catch (similar to IFQs), but only if they pool their shares
collectively (form a cooperative). Co#8208;ops have many of the same benefits as IFQs
because they impose individual accountability and have the same level of catch
monitoring as IFQs. Co#8208;ops are expected to result in lower levels of bycatch and fewer
encounters with depleted species than under existing conditions.
Like IFQs, the proposal for at#8208;sea whiting co#8208;ops includes accumulation limits in order
to distribute activity among more participants. The co#8208;op program for the mothership
whiting fishery would also limit the number of processing vessels (motherships) able to
receive fish at#8208;sea from catcher vessels.
Co#8208;ops have been implemented in several other U.S fisheries and currently exist in the
Bering Sea crab fishery and the Alaska pollock fishery, which are managed by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
4
Economic Impacts
The economic impacts of rationalization will vary among communities. Community
impacts will depend on the level and distribution of fleet consolidation, the economic
efficiency of operations in individual ports, and each community’s proximity to highbycatch
fishing areas. Overall, the number of jobs in the trawl sector is expected to
decline as less efficient vessels leave the fishery; however, the remaining jobs are
expected to be more stable and earn higher wages.
The rationalization program includes an adaptive management provision for the
shoreside non#8208;whiting sector. Under this provision, a percentage of the IFQ will be set
aside and may be used to encourage harvesters to stay with the same ports and
processors, to aid community and regional development, to create incentives for gear
switching, to mitigate unforeseen circumstances of rationalization, to promote
sustainable fishing practices, and to facilitate new entrants to the fishery.
Process
The potential value of IFQs for management was identified in the Council’s 2000
Strategic Plan. Subsequently, the Council and its advisory bodies have been actively
considering whether to rationalize the fishery since November, 2003. The Council has
considered input from its advisory bodies (which include representatives of the fishing
industry, processors, conservation organizations, and agencies); from the public; and
from state and Federal agencies. National Marine Fisheries Service will review the
Council’s recommendation for final approval and implementation into Federal law. A
fully rationalized fishery is not expected to be in place before January 1, 2011.
During their meeting in San Diego, the Council discussed many details related to
rationalization, including which species to manage under the rationalization program;
the number of shoreside sectors; how to involve processors; formulas for initially
allocating quota shares; accumulation limits; area management; the adaptive
management provision; gear switching; carryover and data collection provisions; and
much more. Details on these decisions will be posted on the Council website.
Council Role
The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management
councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of
1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries 3#8208;200 miles offshore of the United States of
America coastline. The Pacific Council recommends management measures for fisheries
5
off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. All Council meetings are open to
the public.
###
On the Web
Pacific Fishery Management Council:
http://www.pcouncil.org
Trawl rationalization environmental impact statement:
http://tinyurl.com/rationalizationdocs
Trawl rationalization page:
http://tinyurl.com/trawlrationalizationagement provision; gear switching; carryover and data collection provisions; and
much more. Details on these decisions will be posted on the Council website.
Council Role
The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management
councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of
1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries 3#8208;200 miles offshore of the United States of
America coastline. The Pacific Council recommends management measures for fisheries
5
off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. All Council meetings are open to
the public.
###
On the Web
Pacific Fishery Management Council:
http://www.pcouncil.org
Trawl rationalization environmental impact statement:
http://tinyurl.com/rationalizationdocs
Trawl rationalization page:
http://tinyurl.com/trawlrationalization
Clinging to my Guns and Religion. www.KoneZone.com
Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, November 10, 2008
Contact: Ms. Jennifer Gilden, Communications Officer, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
Dr. Donald McIsaac, Executive Director, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ADOPTS SWEEPING CHANGES TO
WEST COAST COMMERCIAL GROUNDFISH TRAWL FISHERIES
Portland, OR. – At its meeting in San Diego last week, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council revamped West Coast commercial groundfish fishery management by adopting
a system of individual fishing quotas, or IFQs, for the shoreside trawl fishery, and a
system of structured harvest co#8208;operatives for the at#8208;sea whiting fishery1. These two
commercial fisheries are the largest on the West Coast, with an annual dockside value
of about $61 million in recent years.
Over 100 people provided testimony on the decision, which was made around 9:30 p.m.
on Friday, November 7. Those testifying included fishermen, processors, fishing and
processing family members, port authorities, conservation group members, and local
government officials. The Council also reviewed hundreds of written comments,
including testimony from state and Federal elected officials.
The Council’s decisions will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for
approval and incorporation into Federal law.
These sweeping changes, known as trawl rationalization, were made to achieve
conservation goals and improve the economic status of these large commercial fisheries.
The West Coast trawl fishery is currently managed through a complex system of fleetwide
two#8208;month cumulative landing limits, harvest guidelines and quotas, area
restrictions, seasonal closures, gear restrictions, and frequent in#8208;season adjustments.
This system has resulted in a fishery many believe is economically unsustainable and
plagued by undesirable levels of bycatch (bycatch are fish that are not kept or sold, but
are discarded, usually at sea).
1 The shoreside trawl fishery operates out of West Coast fishing communities to catch a range of
groundfish species, including whiting. The at#8208;sea whiting fishery is centered around motherships and
catcher#8208;processors that primarily operate and process whiting at sea.
2
The rationalization program includes quotas for individual vessels, as opposed to the
fishing fleet as a whole. The new provisions mandate 100 percent observer coverage for
better catch accounting, provide for safer fishing at sea, allow commercial fishermen to
switch to more environmentally benign gear types, reduce wasteful catch practices, and
improve the overall economic benefit of the fishery.
There are currently around 140 limited entry trawl vessels active in any one year on the
west coast, spread across four distinct trawl sectors. Trawlers pull nets through the
ocean, in contrast to trollers, which use hook#8208;and#8208;line gear. The rationalization program
applies to groundfish limited entry trawlers, whiting catcher#8208;processors, and to whiting
mothership processors2. The Council manages over 90 different groundfish species that,
with a few exceptions, live on or near the bottom of the ocean, including rockfish,
flatfish, roundfish (such as whiting), sharks, and skates.
IFQs
An IFQ is a Federal permit to harvest a quantity of fish, usually a percentage of the total
allowable catch in the fishery. It is a revocable privilege, not a property right. While the
initial allocation of IFQ will go to vessel permit owners and processors, the IFQ may be
subsequently transferred, leased, or sold to captains, crew, communities, processors,
environmental groups, or other entities. Harvest privileges can also be revoked if the
IFQ holder does not comply with Federal fishing standards.
IFQs introduce harvester accountability into the fishery management system and
provide incentives to minimize catch of protected species. With IFQs, harvesters can
catch more healthy stocks if they avoid protected species. Harvesters will also have
more flexibility to choose when they fish, operating in a safer, more efficient manner
and optimizing the timing of their deliveries to coincide with market needs. This system
will end the so#8208;called “race for fish” in the whiting fishery, where harvesters compete
with one another to catch as many fish as possible during a short time.
Under the rationalization program adopted by the Pacific Council, the shoreside
whiting and nonwhiting sectors will be merged into a single sector and managed with
IFQs. All vessels will be required to carry government#8208;certified observers, improving
catch estimates for all species.
2 The whiting fishery has three sectors. The shore#8208;based sector is made up of vessels that deliver their catch
to coastal communities. The catcher#8208;processor sector is composed of relatively large vessels of several
hundred feet in length that harvest and process whiting at sea. The mothership sector is composed of
motherships that process whiting delivered by catcher vessels at sea. Motherships do not harvest
whiting themselves, but act as floating processors.
3
Without strict controls on quota ownership, IFQs can lead to the concentration of
harvest privileges in the hands of a few large operators. Because of this, the program
recommended by the Council includes accumulation limits to ensure that such
concentration does not occur. Nevertheless, one of the program’s goals is to increase the
efficiency of the fleet. As a result of rationalization, inefficient vessels are expected to
leave the fishery, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of trawl vessels
operating on the west coast. Harvesters who do not engage in fishing or who leave the
fishery will be able to lease or sell their IFQ, receiving some compensation for exiting
the fishery.
IFQ programs have been successfully used to rationalize fisheries for Alaska halibut
and sablefish, surf clams and ocean quahogs off the Mid#8208;Atlantic states, wreckfish in
the South Atlantic, and the West Coast limited entry fixed gear sablefish fishery. IFQs
are also used in New Zealand, Australia, and Iceland. IFQ program specifics vary
considerably, depending on the fishery in which they are used and the regulations for
each program.
Co#8208;ops
Besides IFQs, the rationalization program also includes harvest co#8208;ops for the
mothership and catcher processor sectors of the whiting fishery. The whiting fishery is a
high#8208;volume, low cost#8208;per#8208;pound fishery that accounts for approximately 60% of the
value of the West Coast commercial groundfish trawl fishery (including the shoreside
fishery).
A co#8208;op is a mutual arrangement among vessels in which members are allocated a
percentage of the allowable catch (similar to IFQs), but only if they pool their shares
collectively (form a cooperative). Co#8208;ops have many of the same benefits as IFQs
because they impose individual accountability and have the same level of catch
monitoring as IFQs. Co#8208;ops are expected to result in lower levels of bycatch and fewer
encounters with depleted species than under existing conditions.
Like IFQs, the proposal for at#8208;sea whiting co#8208;ops includes accumulation limits in order
to distribute activity among more participants. The co#8208;op program for the mothership
whiting fishery would also limit the number of processing vessels (motherships) able to
receive fish at#8208;sea from catcher vessels.
Co#8208;ops have been implemented in several other U.S fisheries and currently exist in the
Bering Sea crab fishery and the Alaska pollock fishery, which are managed by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
4
Economic Impacts
The economic impacts of rationalization will vary among communities. Community
impacts will depend on the level and distribution of fleet consolidation, the economic
efficiency of operations in individual ports, and each community’s proximity to highbycatch
fishing areas. Overall, the number of jobs in the trawl sector is expected to
decline as less efficient vessels leave the fishery; however, the remaining jobs are
expected to be more stable and earn higher wages.
The rationalization program includes an adaptive management provision for the
shoreside non#8208;whiting sector. Under this provision, a percentage of the IFQ will be set
aside and may be used to encourage harvesters to stay with the same ports and
processors, to aid community and regional development, to create incentives for gear
switching, to mitigate unforeseen circumstances of rationalization, to promote
sustainable fishing practices, and to facilitate new entrants to the fishery.
Process
The potential value of IFQs for management was identified in the Council’s 2000
Strategic Plan. Subsequently, the Council and its advisory bodies have been actively
considering whether to rationalize the fishery since November, 2003. The Council has
considered input from its advisory bodies (which include representatives of the fishing
industry, processors, conservation organizations, and agencies); from the public; and
from state and Federal agencies. National Marine Fisheries Service will review the
Council’s recommendation for final approval and implementation into Federal law. A
fully rationalized fishery is not expected to be in place before January 1, 2011.
During their meeting in San Diego, the Council discussed many details related to
rationalization, including which species to manage under the rationalization program;
the number of shoreside sectors; how to involve processors; formulas for initially
allocating quota shares; accumulation limits; area management; the adaptive
man1
Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, November 10, 2008
Contact: Ms. Jennifer Gilden, Communications Officer, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
Dr. Donald McIsaac, Executive Director, 503#8208;820#8208;2280
PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ADOPTS SWEEPING CHANGES TO
WEST COAST COMMERCIAL GROUNDFISH TRAWL FISHERIES
Portland, OR. – At its meeting in San Diego last week, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council revamped West Coast commercial groundfish fishery management by adopting
a system of individual fishing quotas, or IFQs, for the shoreside trawl fishery, and a
system of structured harvest co#8208;operatives for the at#8208;sea whiting fishery1. These two
commercial fisheries are the largest on the West Coast, with an annual dockside value
of about $61 million in recent years.
Over 100 people provided testimony on the decision, which was made around 9:30 p.m.
on Friday, November 7. Those testifying included fishermen, processors, fishing and
processing family members, port authorities, conservation group members, and local
government officials. The Council also reviewed hundreds of written comments,
including testimony from state and Federal elected officials.
The Council’s decisions will be forwarded to the National Marine Fisheries Service for
approval and incorporation into Federal law.
These sweeping changes, known as trawl rationalization, were made to achieve
conservation goals and improve the economic status of these large commercial fisheries.
The West Coast trawl fishery is currently managed through a complex system of fleetwide
two#8208;month cumulative landing limits, harvest guidelines and quotas, area
restrictions, seasonal closures, gear restrictions, and frequent in#8208;season adjustments.
This system has resulted in a fishery many believe is economically unsustainable and
plagued by undesirable levels of bycatch (bycatch are fish that are not kept or sold, but
are discarded, usually at sea).
1 The shoreside trawl fishery operates out of West Coast fishing communities to catch a range of
groundfish species, including whiting. The at#8208;sea whiting fishery is centered around motherships and
catcher#8208;processors that primarily operate and process whiting at sea.
2
The rationalization program includes quotas for individual vessels, as opposed to the
fishing fleet as a whole. The new provisions mandate 100 percent observer coverage for
better catch accounting, provide for safer fishing at sea, allow commercial fishermen to
switch to more environmentally benign gear types, reduce wasteful catch practices, and
improve the overall economic benefit of the fishery.
There are currently around 140 limited entry trawl vessels active in any one year on the
west coast, spread across four distinct trawl sectors. Trawlers pull nets through the
ocean, in contrast to trollers, which use hook#8208;and#8208;line gear. The rationalization program
applies to groundfish limited entry trawlers, whiting catcher#8208;processors, and to whiting
mothership processors2. The Council manages over 90 different groundfish species that,
with a few exceptions, live on or near the bottom of the ocean, including rockfish,
flatfish, roundfish (such as whiting), sharks, and skates.
IFQs
An IFQ is a Federal permit to harvest a quantity of fish, usually a percentage of the total
allowable catch in the fishery. It is a revocable privilege, not a property right. While the
initial allocation of IFQ will go to vessel permit owners and processors, the IFQ may be
subsequently transferred, leased, or sold to captains, crew, communities, processors,
environmental groups, or other entities. Harvest privileges can also be revoked if the
IFQ holder does not comply with Federal fishing standards.
IFQs introduce harvester accountability into the fishery management system and
provide incentives to minimize catch of protected species. With IFQs, harvesters can
catch more healthy stocks if they avoid protected species. Harvesters will also have
more flexibility to choose when they fish, operating in a safer, more efficient manner
and optimizing the timing of their deliveries to coincide with market needs. This system
will end the so#8208;called “race for fish” in the whiting fishery, where harvesters compete
with one another to catch as many fish as possible during a short time.
Under the rationalization program adopted by the Pacific Council, the shoreside
whiting and nonwhiting sectors will be merged into a single sector and managed with
IFQs. All vessels will be required to carry government#8208;certified observers, improving
catch estimates for all species.
2 The whiting fishery has three sectors. The shore#8208;based sector is made up of vessels that deliver their catch
to coastal communities. The catcher#8208;processor sector is composed of relatively large vessels of several
hundred feet in length that harvest and process whiting at sea. The mothership sector is composed of
motherships that process whiting delivered by catcher vessels at sea. Motherships do not harvest
whiting themselves, but act as floating processors.
3
Without strict controls on quota ownership, IFQs can lead to the concentration of
harvest privileges in the hands of a few large operators. Because of this, the program
recommended by the Council includes accumulation limits to ensure that such
concentration does not occur. Nevertheless, one of the program’s goals is to increase the
efficiency of the fleet. As a result of rationalization, inefficient vessels are expected to
leave the fishery, leading to a substantial reduction in the number of trawl vessels
operating on the west coast. Harvesters who do not engage in fishing or who leave the
fishery will be able to lease or sell their IFQ, receiving some compensation for exiting
the fishery.
IFQ programs have been successfully used to rationalize fisheries for Alaska halibut
and sablefish, surf clams and ocean quahogs off the Mid#8208;Atlantic states, wreckfish in
the South Atlantic, and the West Coast limited entry fixed gear sablefish fishery. IFQs
are also used in New Zealand, Australia, and Iceland. IFQ program specifics vary
considerably, depending on the fishery in which they are used and the regulations for
each program.
Co#8208;ops
Besides IFQs, the rationalization program also includes harvest co#8208;ops for the
mothership and catcher processor sectors of the whiting fishery. The whiting fishery is a
high#8208;volume, low cost#8208;per#8208;pound fishery that accounts for approximately 60% of the
value of the West Coast commercial groundfish trawl fishery (including the shoreside
fishery).
A co#8208;op is a mutual arrangement among vessels in which members are allocated a
percentage of the allowable catch (similar to IFQs), but only if they pool their shares
collectively (form a cooperative). Co#8208;ops have many of the same benefits as IFQs
because they impose individual accountability and have the same level of catch
monitoring as IFQs. Co#8208;ops are expected to result in lower levels of bycatch and fewer
encounters with depleted species than under existing conditions.
Like IFQs, the proposal for at#8208;sea whiting co#8208;ops includes accumulation limits in order
to distribute activity among more participants. The co#8208;op program for the mothership
whiting fishery would also limit the number of processing vessels (motherships) able to
receive fish at#8208;sea from catcher vessels.
Co#8208;ops have been implemented in several other U.S fisheries and currently exist in the
Bering Sea crab fishery and the Alaska pollock fishery, which are managed by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council.
4
Economic Impacts
The economic impacts of rationalization will vary among communities. Community
impacts will depend on the level and distribution of fleet consolidation, the economic
efficiency of operations in individual ports, and each community’s proximity to highbycatch
fishing areas. Overall, the number of jobs in the trawl sector is expected to
decline as less efficient vessels leave the fishery; however, the remaining jobs are
expected to be more stable and earn higher wages.
The rationalization program includes an adaptive management provision for the
shoreside non#8208;whiting sector. Under this provision, a percentage of the IFQ will be set
aside and may be used to encourage harvesters to stay with the same ports and
processors, to aid community and regional development, to create incentives for gear
switching, to mitigate unforeseen circumstances of rationalization, to promote
sustainable fishing practices, and to facilitate new entrants to the fishery.
Process
The potential value of IFQs for management was identified in the Council’s 2000
Strategic Plan. Subsequently, the Council and its advisory bodies have been actively
considering whether to rationalize the fishery since November, 2003. The Council has
considered input from its advisory bodies (which include representatives of the fishing
industry, processors, conservation organizations, and agencies); from the public; and
from state and Federal agencies. National Marine Fisheries Service will review the
Council’s recommendation for final approval and implementation into Federal law. A
fully rationalized fishery is not expected to be in place before January 1, 2011.
During their meeting in San Diego, the Council discussed many details related to
rationalization, including which species to manage under the rationalization program;
the number of shoreside sectors; how to involve processors; formulas for initially
allocating quota shares; accumulation limits; area management; the adaptive
management provision; gear switching; carryover and data collection provisions; and
much more. Details on these decisions will be posted on the Council website.
Council Role
The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management
councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of
1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries 3#8208;200 miles offshore of the United States of
America coastline. The Pacific Council recommends management measures for fisheries
5
off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. All Council meetings are open to
the public.
###
On the Web
Pacific Fishery Management Council:
http://www.pcouncil.org
Trawl rationalization environmental impact statement:
http://tinyurl.com/rationalizationdocs
Trawl rationalization page:
http://tinyurl.com/trawlrationalizationagement provision; gear switching; carryover and data collection provisions; and
much more. Details on these decisions will be posted on the Council website.
Council Role
The Pacific Fishery Management Council is one of eight regional fishery management
councils established by the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act of
1976 for the purpose of managing fisheries 3#8208;200 miles offshore of the United States of
America coastline. The Pacific Council recommends management measures for fisheries
5
off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. All Council meetings are open to
the public.
###
On the Web
Pacific Fishery Management Council:
http://www.pcouncil.org
Trawl rationalization environmental impact statement:
http://tinyurl.com/rationalizationdocs
Trawl rationalization page:
http://tinyurl.com/trawlrationalization
Clinging to my Guns and Religion. www.KoneZone.com
)]
