New major study, fish will handle global warming just fine.

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
Fish Will Handle Global Warming Just Fine, According To Major New Study
Fish will likely handle global warming much better than environmentalists predict, according to new government-funded research.

Researchers from the University of East Anglia and Dalhousie University found the Winter Skate, a kind of ray-like finish similar to a shark, could adapt to environmental changes far more rapidly than predicted. In fact, skates have survived much more serious climatic shifts events in their evolutionary history.

Scientists suspect these fish are capable of modifying their gene expression, allowing them to handle changing conditions.

The skates have persisted for more than 150 million years through two mass extinctions, suggesting they have a resilience and an evolutionary strategy allowing them to withstand environmental changes — even though they are currently listed as endangered.

“Our work suggests that some success of sharks, skates and rays over very long evolutionary time scales may be due to their ability to respond rapidly to environmental changes through regulation of gene expression,” Dr. Jack Lighten, a professor of environmental science at the University of East Anglia, said in a press release emailed to The Daily Caller News Foundation. “We are only just beginning to understand how they may be affected by climate change. We hope our findings will open the door for more detailed research on the role that epigenetics may play in allowing vulnerable and ecologically important fish to persist during this period of rapid global warming.”

Researchers concluded that the Winter Skate was far more vulnerable to over-fishing than to climatic change, and suspect their findings could be generalized to many other fish. The research was funded by Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Healthy Oceans Network.

“The Winter Skate has been able to adapt to a dramatically different environment over a short evolutionary time, with apparently little genetic change,” Lighten said. “These adaptive changes in life history, physiology and phenotype have occurred through epigenetic regulation causing changes in gene expression, enabling the species to respond rapidly to environmental challenges.”

This isn’t the first time researchers have found that life will be considerably more resistant to global warming than environmentalist claims say.

Several recent studies rebuke previous claims that global warming could cause the total collapse of American and global agriculture. It is the latest scientific study to show that nature is considerably more resilient to global warming than scientists suspected, and even United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change now believes that the evidence linking global warming to extinctions is sparse.

Research suggests that plant growth would limit the impact of global warming. High CO2 levels cause plant life to thrive, particularly in arid regions where carbon emissions are literally causing deserts to bloom. A study funded by The National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy found that global warming won’t cause global agriculture to collapse and could even boost agricultural yields.

Previous studies suggest global warming is causing roughly half of Earth’s land-mass to demonstrate “significant greening,” and only 4 percent of the world saw a decrease in plant life. The increased vegetation growth caused by warmer temperatures is likely slowing global warming as well, since more trees and plants equates to more sequestered CO2.

Scientists suspect that global warming will likely have many positive environmental impacts, such as helping Canadian trees recover from a devastating insect infestation, creating more food for fish in the ocean, making life easier for Alaskan moose and improving the environment for bees.
 
That's kind of funny that when the conservatives were busy slashing the budget of the department of Fisheries and Oceans they found money to fund a study that high green house gasses aren't that bad. Kind of fits directly in line with their energy policy of supporting the dirty polluting tar sands projects. I'm not saying the study is suspect, I'm just saying it's pretty ironic.

The auditors report on DFO was highly critical of the department for being under funded and not having current plans for managing threatened fish stocks. So, while there was no money available to fund studies to manage our own threatened fish stocks, there was money to fund a British research project on Skates to disprove climate change impacts on fish.

Wow, shows exactly where the governments priorities are. Plenty of money for studies to support polluting big oil projects (and any industry generating jobs and revenue) and no money to actually protect threatened fish stocks on the west coast. Build those dams, mines, fish farms, pipelines, and oil terminals, extract billions of cubic feet of gravel from the Fraser's spawning beds. The DFO can always be counted on to rubber stamp anything that generates jobs and revenue for the government. When are they actually going to start living up to their legal obligation to protect fish stocks and the aquatic environment.

Pretty sad commentary on where the departments priorities lie.

Thanks for the post, I just find it kind of pathetic that this study can get funded, when our fish stocks at home have no funding available.
 
Last edited:
DFO cutting back deeper again next year. Thank you Mr Harper. Maybe instead of writing letters about fish farms and how they are bad for the wild stocks. Maybe put some effort in writing a letter about funding. This way you could solve many of the issues people complain about. Bad stock counts, hatcheries reduced numbers, lack of funding for stream projects, mismanaged and lack of enforcement on so many levels, fish farm coexistence management studies.... Etc.

It all comes down to money and the lack of it going to dfo.
 
Gil-- there was a time back when I was working that I HAD to understand learned dissertations. Now I dont- I put the thesaurus and science dictionaries on the bookshelf and am now happy wallowing in my ignorance of words bigger than "elephant ****" So what did the beakers say in REAL language ?? :p

It's an interesting study on one type of fish, one that has a long life and is slow to mature. The question is how can a fish that has that characteristic change in a blink of an eye (7000 years) when speaking in terms of evolution. The answer is .... epigenetics.

Epigenetics is the study, in the field of genetics, of cellular and physiological phenotypic trait variations that are caused by external or environmental factors that switch genes on and off and affect how cells read genes instead of being caused by changes in the DNA sequence. Hence, epigenetic research seeks to describe dynamic alterations in the transcriptional potential of a cell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics

Here is a link to a science website that seeks to explain the paper. Unlike the post from OBD to a website (dailycaller) that is famous for clouding the issue so as to leave the reader with a view that everything will be fine and/or those scientists don't know nuttin.
There is a saying... the most dangerous lies are the ones you tell yourself.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161025201622.htm
 
Ignorance is bliss.
Besides warming, pollution is making the ocean's more acidic - things that need some sort calcium such as Oysters coral, etc are dying off.
 
Back
Top