ClayoquotKid
Active Member
It's quite illustrating CK - that you would rather dream about what I wear while I post - rather than actually have a debate on the science - or lack thereof.
It's interesting that on one post you are attempting to discredit my knowledge by claiming that I only have "limited knowledge" about fish farms - while on another you admit that I "have quite thoroughly investigated" issues. I guess it depends upon whether you like what I have to say - rather than wishing to debate the science because you understand that you cannot defend your industry's actions. I'll let you in on a secret - I "thoroughly investigate" all the issues.
You are (so far) the most immature and myoptic so-called "professional" from the open net-cage industry I have ever attempted to communicate with. However, I appreciate you are ilustrating the lack of willingness to honestly communicate with others, and the myoptic propaganda spewing ad nausium from your industry - to others on the internet. It really illustrates why the functioning of this industry is so acrimonious and disrespectful.
Coming from you I'll take that as a compliment.
Maybe you can "thoroughly investigate" an instance where salmon farms in BC have negatively impacted wild stocks.
"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong."
Richard P. Feynman