Fraser River Sockeye, tagging.

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
high tech salmon tagging project may help resolve one of the vexing unanswered questions of the Cohen Commission report on the decline of the Fraser River sockeye.

Justice Bruce Cohen made no judgment on the effects of net-pen salmon farms on wild salmon — it was one of four potential smoking guns identified in the proceedings — but he did hear a mountain of testimony alleging harm and some evidence to the contrary. Among the recommendations of the report was a September 30, 2020, deadline for resolving the question of harm to wild salmon by fish farms in the Discovery Islands.

A multi-year study financed by the Pacific Salmon Commission aims to do just that.

“There is real mystery about where and when salmon die,” said Tony Farrell, a professor of biology at the University of British Columbia. “A female sockeye produces 3,000 eggs, but you only need two survivors to sustain the population, so that means 99.6 per cent of the eggs die at some stage of the salmon’s life, most of them as juvenile fish and later in life.”

New programmable tags used in the study are small enough to implant in fish only 10 cm long, which will provide rich information about what happens to young fish in fresh water and later when they reach saltwater and migrate to the open ocean.

“We are asking the question, what is the mortality rate for fish as they go past fish farms moving from the Strait of Georgia and out to the Hecate Strait?” Farrell said. “There are people who believe that wild salmon going past the fish farms are suffering undue mortality and this is one way to get at that.”

The project will also shed light on the directions that juvenile salmon take on their way to the ocean, where and when they succumb to disease or predation.

“This year’s work with Chilko chinook and sockeye will tell us what routes these fish take, whether that is the back channels where the fish farms are or straight up Discovery Passage west of Quadra Island,” said Dave Welch, president of Kintama Research Services, which is doing the tagging and sensor deployment. “(Discovery Passage through to Johnstone Strait) is the main channel through and it looks like most of the smolts are taking that way, where there are no fish farms.”

About 100 chinook salmon from the Chehalis River Hatchery were tagged and released earlier this month. Another 300 sockeye will be tagged and released later this year in the Chilko River. They will be the smallest fish ever to carry acoustic transmitters.

The fish that survive will pass arrays of acoustic receivers strung under the water in the Fraser River and salt waters between the mainland and Vancouver Island from the Strait of Juan de Fuca to the north end of Johnstone Strait.

This year’s goal is to prove the effectiveness of the tiny programmable tags. Upgrades to sensor arrays will provide a more precise picture of the geography of juvenile salmon mortality, possibly providing an answer to Justice Cohen’s question about the impact of fish farms on wild salmon.

Tags on half of the salmon in the study will run until the end of summer, while the other half will turn themselves off to conserve battery power and then turn back on as the first set of tags shut down, allowing researchers to monitor fish movements and survival until winter.

“The V5 tag gives us the flexibility to adjust the strength of the signal and turn the tag on and off over limited periods. By doing tricks like that we are able to capture data over a much longer period of time,” said Brian Riddell, president of the Pacific Salmon Commission.

The B.C. Salmon Farmers Association is contributing $150,000 over three years to the project.

“Salmon farmers know a tremendous amount about the fish they raise,” said Jeremy Dunn, executive director of the salmon farmers association. “What is apparent is that more knowledge is needed on wild Pacific salmon and understanding their migration timing and routes is important information.”

rshore@postme
 
Do you have the direct link to this? Most definitely a few minor errors.

The Province and the Sun, newspapers.
 
Yeah there are a few errors (actually they are refinements) in the article. The new, smaller V5 tags can be inserted into smolts around 86mm I believe. The new tags about the size of a tic-tac. The tagging of Chilko Sockeye smolts right now is being done by researchers from the University of BC with support from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Lastly, the assumption here is that tagged smolts will behave like non-tagged smolts. Keep that in mind when drawing conclusions. What errors did you find in the article, Dave?
 
As I said, minor stuff. Seems to me the reporter should have researched this a bit more; Riddell is the president of the Pacific Salmon Foundation, not the Pacific Salmon Commission. And, as you say. implanted smolts will most likely not behave the same as non sedated fish.
But, having said that, this is as good as research can get. Looking forward to the results.
 
Oh I missed that about the PSF and the PSC? Good catch. Yeah, I agree it's good research. It's nice to see such a collaboration of respected people doing this work. Now if the bull trout hopefully cooperate......lol.
 
Lol..
..decline of fraser river sockeye=nonstop in river netting
Stop the netting and the stocks will rebound. Unfortunetly the truth hurts and because it involves illegal and legal first nations netting nobody wants to get involved.
 
Lol..
..decline of fraser river sockeye=nonstop in river netting
Stop the netting and the stocks will rebound. Unfortunetly the truth hurts and because it involves illegal and legal first nations netting nobody wants to get involved.
Yah its all the Indians fault. They have been at it for Hundreds of years its a wonder there is even a fish left.:rolleyes: Open net Farms have only been around a couple of decades so it couldn't be them.
 
Obviously you spend zero time on the fraser from Hope to the mouth. Non stop drift netting and set nets have been rampant over the last 10 years. Weird how the stocks are all crashing....
Fish farms are definetly a factor though...
 
Yah its all the Indians fault. They have been at it for Hundreds of years its a wonder there is even a fish left.:rolleyes: Open net Farms have only been around a couple of decades so it couldn't be them.
Yah they've been using Jet boats and huge nets for "hundreds" of years
 
Obviously you spend zero time on the fraser from Hope to the mouth. Non stop drift netting and set nets have been rampant over the last 10 years. Weird how the stocks are all crashing....
Fish farms are definetly a factor though...
All stocks are crashing? Which stocks are you referring to? For Fraser Sockeye, it is true that the 2015 escapement was not good; however, not all CUs did poorly. When you look across all Fraser Sockeye CUs there were some that did not follow the trend. Some did better than brood or were close to cycle average. Harrison Sockeye apparently "do not swim past fish farms", but fell well short of brood in both year classes that typically return. This is just some of the mystifying things that came out of 2015. When you look at Fraser Chinook they did much better especially in the South Thompson and Nicola areas. However, Fraser Coho and Pink didn't do so well. The thing about the media and certain activist blogs/Facebook pages is that folks don't see the whole story; however, when you look at the numbers closer you will see these inconsistencies. With the Adams, folks cannot look at one year and say it is crashing because actually survival of Late South Thompson Sockeye has been relatively unchanged over the long term.
 
Fraser sockeye stocks that are declining
-Early summer north and south thompson
-Summer chilko, quesnel,harrison
-fall thomp,birk and lower fraser
Fraser chinook decline this year
-mid/upper fraser
-summer and fall chinook
Most stocks of fraser chinook are supposed to be below average or stocks of concern this year even the south thompson.
There is many factors on the decline of our fraser stocks, but you have to be blind and not around much in the lower fraser to see the impact the netting is having
 
Folks should see the whole story … that's crazy talk Shuswap!!! LOL!! Does that mean that fisheries productivity is actually a complex issue and there aren't any easy answers or "smoking gun" scape-goats? Are you saying we can't find the answers by using social media and parroting other people's opinions? What about when the scape-goat also confirms my thinly-veiled bigotry, its valid then, isn't it?

Thanks Shuswap for your ongoing attempts to bring the unbiased facts into these types of fisheries discussions, even if they aren't as fun as the unsupported opinions of the arm-chair experts!!

Cheers!

Ukee
 
x2 on that Ukee. Shuswap is on several sites, under different names, but all benefit from his insight and knowledge.
 
Fraser sockeye stocks that are declining
-Early summer north and south thompson
-Summer chilko, quesnel,harrison
-fall thomp,birk and lower fraser
Fraser chinook decline this year
-mid/upper fraser
-summer and fall chinook
Most stocks of fraser chinook are supposed to be below average or stocks of concern this year even the south thompson.
There is many factors on the decline of our fraser stocks, but you have to be blind and not around much in the lower fraser to see the impact the netting is having
South Thompson Chinook declining? How so? What metric are you using here? However, I concur about the other Fraser Chinook stocks in the mid and upper Fraser.

For Fraser Sockeye, what metrics are you using to say whether a CU is declining or declining? Are you using cycle year average, are you using just 2015 escapement estimates or a few consecutive years back, or are you using survival (returns per spawner)? We need to be talking the same language here.

Harrison Sockeye have shown dramatic increases in survival since 2000 despite falling well below brood last year. Not sure where you are getting your facts on Harrison Sockeye. Not declining if you look at the long term average; however, forecasting future survival of this CU is difficult because some of the recent escapements make modelling challenging. As I said previously about Late South Thompson Sockeye, they have not shown declining survival over the long term - more of a steady trend of not terribly declining nor increasing.

Between 2010 and 2014 Fraser Sockeye survival was close to average. When you look at individual stock trends you will notice that some have exhibited above average survival and some have exhibited above or near average survival. There is also considerable inter-annual variability in survival between the freshwater and marine environments. With Quesnel Sockeye there is likely more going on than just marine influences because kokanee and rainbow trout in the lake were doing poorly also especially following some huge Sockeye escapements in the early 2000s. Quesnel and Chilko Sockeye co-migrate up the Fraser but Chilko is doing much better in the escapement department. When you look at North Thompson River Sockeye you have to view numbers with caution as estimates are dependent on visual conditions in the river. The North Thompson is notorious turbid and the window for counting can be small. That's why I was saying that there are inconsistencies across the board so it is not so easy to draw conclusions on the reason for declines especially when these Fraser Sockeye run-timing groups co-migrate up the Fraser. There are many factors and interception by commercial, FN and sport fisheries is just one of them.
 
Back
Top