Hatchery Salmon help avert fishery disaster.

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
Hatchery salmon help Alaska avert fishery disaster
Around mid-August this year, the fishing season in Southeast Alaska looked grim. Some areas had posted the lowest pink salmon landings since the 1970s, and the total pink catch would end up at just around 70 percent of the paltry 23 million fish forecast. For comparison, the 18 million pinks caught in 2016 prompted a disaster declaration from the federal government.

But at the end of August, something unexpected happen. Hatchery chum salmon from the National Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association (NSRAA) remote release site at Crawfish Inlet, 40 miles south of Sitka, returned in unprecedented numbers, providing a massive shot in the arm for the industry.

“The Crawfish Inlet fishery literally saved seasons,” Jeremy Woodrow, the communications director for the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, told SeafoodSource. “There were guys talking to their processors about renegotiating loans because they weren’t going to be able to make payments this winter, and after that opening they called back and said, ‘Never mind, we’re good.’”

On a single opener on 30 August, fishermen scooped up over 900,000 hatchery chums, a catch that added up to a USD 6 million (EUR 5.3 million) payout to fishermen, and USD 13 million (EUR 11.5 million) for the first wholesaler. A few more openers padded those numbers, and by the second week in September, processors and fishermen were basking in a significant windfall.

“The total ex-vessel value to fishermen was something on the order of USD 15 million [EUR 13.2 million], roughly, from the Crawfish Inlet program. And the first wholesale value of just that one program alone was about USD 30 million [26 million],” NSRAA General Manager Steve Reifenstuhl told SeafoodSource.

NSRAA has only released fish at Crawfish Inlet for two years, in 2014 and 2015. Reifenstuhl said while 2017 returns of three-year-olds from the 2014 brood year were good, they were not inordinate. This season, however, returns from both brood years came in at stunning volumes. The three-year-olds from the 2015 brood year returned in greatest numbers, adding up to around 2.7 million fish.

“Those fish alone represent over a 10 percent marine survival. I’ve never heard of it before and we’ve never seen anything quite like it in the history of NSRAA,” said Reifenstuhl, who has spent most of his 37-year career with NSRAA.

A more reasonable marine survival rate is around two to 2.5 percent, which is what the successful Deep Inlet hatchery has been holding at for a number of years.

Reifenstuhl chalks the high survival rates up to a couple of factors, most prominent among them being the new site of the hatchery. Over the years, predators like humpback whales, pollock and cod gather at release sites to feed on the injection of biomass, often lowering survival rates at older sites.

Reifenstuhl added that chum salmon’s diet may be more well-suited to warming ocean conditions. While chums prefer zooplankton, they have a broader diet than many other salmon species, and will eat jellyfish and salps when their preferred food source is not available.

“Compared to other salmon, they have a much more mixed and broad diet. If the highest protein and fat prey isn’t available, chums will switch to other things,” Reifenstuhl said.

Whatever the cause for the high survival, Woodrow said it shows how hatcheries help the industry power through periods of low wild runs.

“It’s a perfect example of how Alaska’s hatchery system has done a great job of balancing the swings we have naturally in the wild populations … It’s important to have these hatchery runs because it keeps fishermen stable and allows them to fish year-to-year, so when we do have large wild runs we have an industry to fish those runs,” Woodrow said.

But there are some people who argue that it is precisely the hatchery fish that are stunting the wild runs. Last week, the Alaska Board of Fisheries heard two proposals from sport-fishing advocates to reduce limits on hatchery releases.

Both the motions were rejected, but the board and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) have pledged to keep analyzing the interplay between hatchery fish and wild runs.

“We’ve spent a lot of money trying to answer these questions. We have an ongoing research project with the private sector, NGOs and other researchers,” said Forrest Bowers, the acting director for the ADF&G’s division of commercial fisheries.

Bowers said the studies focus on straying hatchery fish and how they might affect wild populations as well as the effects of commingling.

“We know that hatcheries done wrong can have a negative impact. That’s sort of the story of hatcheries in the Pacific Northwest, and our program is structured in a way that we’re trying to minimize negative effects,” Bowers said.

Bowers pointed out that in the last 10 years, Alaska has seen the three largest salmon harvests on record, and all of them coincided with large wild stock returns.

Last year, total salmon landings in Alaska were around 222 million, and about 47 million of those were hatchery fish.

Photo courtesy of NSRAA
 
Hatchery salmon help Alaska avert fishery disaster
Around mid-August this year, the fishing season in Southeast Alaska looked grim. Some areas had posted the lowest pink salmon landings since the 1970s, and the total pink catch would end up at just around 70 percent of the paltry 23 million fish forecast. For comparison, the 18 million pinks caught in 2016 prompted a disaster declaration from the federal government.

But at the end of August, something unexpected happen. Hatchery chum salmon from the National Southeast Regional Aquaculture Association (NSRAA) remote release site at Crawfish Inlet, 40 miles south of Sitka, returned in unprecedented numbers, providing a massive shot in the arm for the industry.

“The Crawfish Inlet fishery literally saved seasons,” Jeremy Woodrow, the communications director for the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, told SeafoodSource. “There were guys talking to their processors about renegotiating loans because they weren’t going to be able to make payments this winter, and after that opening they called back and said, ‘Never mind, we’re good.’”

On a single opener on 30 August, fishermen scooped up over 900,000 hatchery chums, a catch that added up to a USD 6 million (EUR 5.3 million) payout to fishermen, and USD 13 million (EUR 11.5 million) for the first wholesaler. A few more openers padded those numbers, and by the second week in September, processors and fishermen were basking in a significant windfall.

“The total ex-vessel value to fishermen was something on the order of USD 15 million [EUR 13.2 million], roughly, from the Crawfish Inlet program. And the first wholesale value of just that one program alone was about USD 30 million [26 million],” NSRAA General Manager Steve Reifenstuhl told SeafoodSource.

NSRAA has only released fish at Crawfish Inlet for two years, in 2014 and 2015. Reifenstuhl said while 2017 returns of three-year-olds from the 2014 brood year were good, they were not inordinate. This season, however, returns from both brood years came in at stunning volumes. The three-year-olds from the 2015 brood year returned in greatest numbers, adding up to around 2.7 million fish.

“Those fish alone represent over a 10 percent marine survival. I’ve never heard of it before and we’ve never seen anything quite like it in the history of NSRAA,” said Reifenstuhl, who has spent most of his 37-year career with NSRAA.

A more reasonable marine survival rate is around two to 2.5 percent, which is what the successful Deep Inlet hatchery has been holding at for a number of years.

Reifenstuhl chalks the high survival rates up to a couple of factors, most prominent among them being the new site of the hatchery. Over the years, predators like humpback whales, pollock and cod gather at release sites to feed on the injection of biomass, often lowering survival rates at older sites.

Reifenstuhl added that chum salmon’s diet may be more well-suited to warming ocean conditions. While chums prefer zooplankton, they have a broader diet than many other salmon species, and will eat jellyfish and salps when their preferred food source is not available.

“Compared to other salmon, they have a much more mixed and broad diet. If the highest protein and fat prey isn’t available, chums will switch to other things,” Reifenstuhl said.

Whatever the cause for the high survival, Woodrow said it shows how hatcheries help the industry power through periods of low wild runs.

“It’s a perfect example of how Alaska’s hatchery system has done a great job of balancing the swings we have naturally in the wild populations … It’s important to have these hatchery runs because it keeps fishermen stable and allows them to fish year-to-year, so when we do have large wild runs we have an industry to fish those runs,” Woodrow said.

But there are some people who argue that it is precisely the hatchery fish that are stunting the wild runs. Last week, the Alaska Board of Fisheries heard two proposals from sport-fishing advocates to reduce limits on hatchery releases.

Both the motions were rejected, but the board and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) have pledged to keep analyzing the interplay between hatchery fish and wild runs.

“We’ve spent a lot of money trying to answer these questions. We have an ongoing research project with the private sector, NGOs and other researchers,” said Forrest Bowers, the acting director for the ADF&G’s division of commercial fisheries.

Bowers said the studies focus on straying hatchery fish and how they might affect wild populations as well as the effects of commingling.

“We know that hatcheries done wrong can have a negative impact. That’s sort of the story of hatcheries in the Pacific Northwest, and our program is structured in a way that we’re trying to minimize negative effects,” Bowers said.

Bowers pointed out that in the last 10 years, Alaska has seen the three largest salmon harvests on record, and all of them coincided with large wild stock returns.

Last year, total salmon landings in Alaska were around 222 million, and about 47 million of those were hatchery fish.

Photo courtesy of NSRAA
It’s a no brainer. Unfortunately our government is to stupid to get it.
 
It’s a no brainer. Unfortunately our government is to stupid to get it.
Too stupid to get what? To pump out billions of low value pink and chum fry to compete with valuable chinook and coho like alaska does? Is that what you are advocating we do in BC? In this respect I hope they stay "stupid". Sport fishing groups have gone to court to try and reduce industrial scale pink and chum production in Alaska that more and more evidence points to having negative effects on chinook and coho stocks. They have been unsuccessful as powerful commercial interests want the pink and chum harvests.
 
Too stupid to get what? To pump out billions of low value pink and chum fry to compete with valuable chinook and coho like alaska does? Is that what you are advocating we do in BC? In this respect I hope they stay "stupid". Sport fishing groups have gone to court to try and reduce industrial scale pink and chum production in Alaska that more and more evidence points to having negative effects on chinook and coho stocks. They have been unsuccessful as powerful commercial interests want the pink and chum harvests.
Yes too stupid to move to ocean ranching as opposed to Fish farms. Alaska and Russia both have huge returns of sockeye this year. That tells me there is enough feed in the Pacific to support what they are doing. There is far more issues for Chinook than that. So yes I fully support ocean ranching.
How was the chum derby this yeAr in Johnstone straits? I’m sure those guys may have liked a few more fish.
 
Well it depends on the ocean survival rates in some cases DFO would be better of just giving the money to commercial fishermen then bothering spending it in hatchery production.
 
Yes too stupid to move to ocean ranching as opposed to Fish farms. Alaska and Russia both have huge returns of sockeye this year. That tells me there is enough feed in the Pacific to support what they are doing. There is far more issues for Chinook than that. So yes I fully support ocean ranching.
How was the chum derby this yeAr in Johnstone straits? I’m sure those guys may have liked a few more fish.

The copper, Kenai and other sockeye runs were very poor this year. Only the Bristol bay runs were exceptionally strong, and the reason believed for that is that they rear in the Bering Sea where conditions were favourable, not the gulf of Alaska where copper, Kenai and other weak runs rear. But yeah, good idea, lets move to massive chum hatchery production based on one year of weak returns (Chum returns have been good previously) and manage the BC sports fishery with a primary goal of the browns bay chum derby being a success. DFO just is too stupid to figure this one out I guess. :rolleyes:. Important to keep this guy and the boys in the "chum Dumpster" happy!
index.php
 
Last edited:
Well it depends on the ocean survival rates in some cases DFO would be better of just giving the money to commercial fishermen then bothering spending it in hatchery production.
How so? The commercial fleet harvested under 100,000 Chinook this year. What was the sports take???
 
The copper, Kenai and other sockeye runs were very poor this year. Only the Bristol bay runs were exceptionally strong, and the reason believed for that is that they rear in the Bering Sea where conditions were favourable, not the gulf of Alaska where copper, Kenai and other weak runs rear. But yeah, good idea, lets move to massive chum hatchery production based on one year of weak returns (Chum returns have been good previously) and manage the BC sports fishery with a primary goal of the browns bay chum derby being a success. DFO just is too stupid to figure this one out I guess. :rolleyes:. Important to keep this guy and the boys in the "chum Dumpster" happy!
index.php
It’s not about one year of peak returns. Chinook are tougher to raise and the survival rate is poor. The commercial fleet looks at feeding people so yes to us ocean ranching is an answer. Keep playing catch and release with the Chinook and lets see how that plays out.
 
about 200,000 last year from my calcs...probably went down comparable to commercial this year as well
How do you figure. 300,000 licences sold and you feel only 2/3 people catch one fish?????? Come on. I’m a ****** sportsfisher and I caught 3.
 
How do you figure. 300,000 licences sold and you feel only 2/3 people catch one fish?????? Come on. I’m a ****** sportsfisher and I caught 3.
you think they are all out there looking for the elusive chinook? Even those that do, you say it yourself, most are ****** sportsfishers! Go look yourself https://www.psc.org/publications/technical-reports/technical-committee-reports/chinook/ (first download) - I say about 200,000 but its a weird reporting as they seem to be a few numbers from same areas so I don't know if you combine them or not - ie, for WCVI there is a sport landed of 49,177 through AABM, but then there is also a reference to an NBC AABM fishery that shows 38,819, and ISBM showing 41,998. So do you combine the numbers or is one part of the other or 2 part of the 3rd? It could be 49k or it could be 130k for west coast. Same with North coast - it gives 45,600 & 42,800 & 10,108 - it could mean 45,600 or it could mean 98,508. Then the remaining areas are only on the ISBM chart - 6679 central bc, 13684 Johnstone strait, 59412 JDF, 28369 Fraser......

I have no clue what the scoop is and maybe someone can better explain, but to me, it looks like sports catch could be 202744 or it could be 336652. I suspect its the first though since the single count seems to jive say with the 59k of JDF (ie vs 49k WCVI) - believeable to me so maybe the variations are just different models/calculations of the same thing.

That is how I figure :)
 
Back
Top