Government cracking down on roadside salmon sales

Sushihunter

Active Member
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/government-cracking-down-on-roadside-salmon-sales-near-port-alberni/article1641783/

Government cracking down on roadside salmon sales near Port Alberni

Robert Matas

sockeye_jpeg_767321gm-a.jpg


Vancouver — From Friday's Globe and Mail
Published on Thursday, Jul. 15, 2010 9:17PM EDT
Last updated on Thursday, Jul. 15, 2010 9:22PM EDT


Tseshaht First Nation Chief Les Sam has seen this before. The federal Fisheries Department has stepped up efforts to close down part of the aboriginal fishery. This year, federal enforcement officers are going after roadside sales of sockeye salmon in and around Port Alberni on Vancouver Island.

“DFO [the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans] always has charges against our people for various things,” Mr. Sam said.

“Throughout our history we have been harassed by DFO and we have been charged. In the eighties, we had 258 charges against us. Then they found it better to negotiate something with us, rather than fight us,” he said Thursday.

“But now we are back fighting again, it seems.”

In a crackdown on illegal roadside sales, the Fisheries Department brought extra staff to Vancouver Island this summer to gather evidence that would support charges in court.

The federal government has not authorized any openings for native commercial fisheries on the Somass River outside Port Alberni, said John Lewis, the department’s chief of conservation and protection for the south coast.

The salmon travel from Barkley Sound through the Alberni Inlet to reach spawning beds on the Somass River.

Authorities so far have found 32 signs on the Tseshaht reserve advertising sale of sockeye, Mr. Lewis said.

Enforcement officers have distributed “information notices” to Tseshaht fisherman, advising them that selling fish caught without a commercial fishing licence is illegal. They are collecting information about those who fish without a commercial licence. An educational campaign has also been launched to discourage the public from buying salmon from unauthorized vendors.

The fisheries office has been inundated with calls from the public expressing concerns over what they believe are illegal sales, Mr. Lewis said.

“We are very understanding and sensitive to their rights under the Constitution and under arrangements and policies we have within the department,” Mr. Lewis said. However, the department has a responsibility to manage the resource properly, he added.

Aggressive enforcement efforts had no visible impact on the native fishermen who continued to catch and sell salmon this week. Mr. Sam said they were fishing according to the first nation’s management plan for salmon that limits fishing to two days a week.

Unlike the past few years, no one this year is raising the possibility that the salmon runs are facing extinction. The sockeye are returning in far greater numbers than federal officials anticipated. The preseason forecast for salmon in Barkley Sound, which head to spawning grounds into three rivers in mid-Vancouver Island, was 600,000 but the current estimate is for 900,000.

About 419,000 sockeye could be caught without affecting the sustainability of the runs, federal officials say. So far, commercial seine and gill fishermen have taken 178,638 sockeye and sport fishermen have caught 42,700.

The Tseshaht and another native community in the area have caught 73,500 for food, social and ceremonial purposes and have not exceeded their allocation. But enforcement officers believe that a portion of those fish are ending up in roadside sales. Federal officials suspect as many 10,000 sockeye may have been sold illegally.

Federal officials and Tseshaht representatives tried to resolve their differences after B.C. Supreme Court last year ruled that natives have a right to sell fish but the number of fish has to be negotiated with the government.

“We have had a very difficult relationship with first nations in Port Alberni for many, many years,” Mr. Lewis said. The Tseshaht and the federal government worked hard to reach an accord but were unable to come to a negotiated agreement, he said. However, fisheries officials are not looking for a direct confrontation with the Tseshaht, he added.

But Mr. Sam said the Tseshaht were willing to reach an agreement, but the federal government wanted to give too large a portion to the commercial fishery.

“We were looking to negotiate some fair, equitable share of the resource that used to be controlled 100 per cent by the Tseshaht,” Mr. Sam said.




Jim's Fishing Charters
www.JimsFishing.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/Sushihunter250

jfc_banner-2009-01.jpg
 
Our government trying to protect our resource?....... yeah right. So go after the first nations. What the #$%^. If the FN are allowed a quota let them do what they please with them so long as they are used appropriately and not just dumped. The government controlling liscences in terms of FN sales only equals the share on taxes that our goverment wants a cut of. Protecting our fish .... BS.... it's another cash grab.

There are bigger issues than wheather FN sell their quota or not . Bottom line is that number will be killed regardless if they eat them or sell them.
 
quote:Originally posted by highlights

Our government trying to protect our resource?....... yeah right. So go after the first nations. What the #$%^. If the FN are allowed a quota let them do what they please with them so long as they are used appropriately and not just dumped. The government controlling liscences in terms of FN sales only equals the share on taxes that our goverment wants a cut of. Protecting our fish .... BS.... it's another cash grab.

There are bigger issues than wheather FN sell their quota or not . Bottom line is that number will be killed regardless if they eat them or sell them.

Exactly. This is just a PR ploy to appease all the concerned "crackers."

In the end it has nothing to do with protecting fish especially during a healthy run.
 
Sometimes it takes a few more than just one causing all the s%^&hit disturbing around here. LOL These have always been my beliefs but as you know we have some strong opinions on these boards. Some people will just never get it. I tend to be diplomatic as often as possible so that I can get my point across unscathed. I too notice more and more guys voicing their opinions. It is definitely welcome as we are at a crossroads with our fishery.



Like unkown says guys, keep writing those letters if you already have and of course , for those of you on the fence, there's no time like the present.

HL
 
I agree that DFO needs to put the political interference in the garbage can and leave it their. Let the field people do their job and heed their advice. However, I still have a problem with any sector who feels they are above the law. (not meaning illegal sales but continuing to fish when told the quota is reached) How can DFO or anyone ever hope do their job if they are ignored and any sector just carries on with their own agenda each year. There is a time to argue your beef prior to the season and try to win your case. Then live with the outcome and fight it again next year if you still feel you have a case. What would happen if the commercial guys just kept fishing? The commercial guys have held protest fisheries before when they felt cheated, but that consisted of boats on the grounds without hooks in the water. Making DFO come out to check them, with the media in tow. They got their point across without killing more fish. Unknown, we need to work together YES that is a must, but so is following a management plan. Lets just hope we see a good plan sooner than later. One that is easy for everyone to believe in and follow.
 
Back
Top