77 pound Chinook caught at Langara yesterday

I'd put it at a 50/50 chance of that fish being a Skeena (Kalum) vs Wannock fish. Really the only 2 rivers that produce fish that size any more and given the catch date it's right at back-end of the Skeena run timing and front-end of the Wannock run timing for fish passing by north end of Haida Gwaii.

Given the fact it was an LIL guide handling the fish who most likely knows best practices I'd say there is a very good chance that fish will live to reach it's spawning grounds. Would the survival rate be slightly higher if the fish was left in the water? perhaps. But kudos to these guys for releasing this incredible fish. I've fished my whole life and I'm still dreaming of the day I hook into one that like and, yes, I'd probably carefully take mine out of the water for a few seconds to get a pic before carefully putting it back in the water to revive and let swim away.

In total, I think the Kalum has avergaed around 10K chinook spawners/year of late and the Wannock closer to 5K chinook spawners/year. Out of those probably a small percentage that are bigger than the fish caught here but certainly a few monsters in the 60's, 70's and 80's + each year still spawn at both locations. Let's hope people continue to let these now very rare fish swim free so that we can keep a few of these big ones in the gene pool for others to enjoy.

Dead skeena fish

Wonder how many come back to the skeena each year that Size anymore....
 
Very unlikely a Kenai fish would stray down to Langara area before heading way back up to where the Kenai is located but, hey, it's the ocean and weird stuff happens.

Here's some old catch data from Langara that shows origin of all chinook caught over the sampling time frame. Pretty interesting just how many chinook come from the Fraser river and south (Wash, Columbia, OR). A good reminder that fish move!

Is there a chance it could be a Kenai or some other Alaska bound fish?
 

Attachments

  • Langara chinook origin.JPG
    Langara chinook origin.JPG
    53.3 KB · Views: 108
I'm surprised Doug's website is still live!
probably just timing of websites annual hosting fee or something? It's a shame he moved on and sold the boat, but I can't blame him one bit. He could also be leaving it open so past guests could find him and contact him and he has a preferred referral or something??
 
I just got back from a Langara trip and their rules for handling fish are very specific. Your encouraged to release in the water but if you want to take pictures basically have everything ready. Camera, measuring tape, pliers etc. Have your deck clean so no possible tangles. Fish must go back in the water in 30 seconds max. You'll notice that the guide almost always holds the fish and controls the process. There is also a Seaqualizer on every boat and you must re-descend Yellow eye or face possible fines from DFO who are around all the time checking boats.
I did a 3 night 4 day trip and limited on Chinook, Coho, 1 halibut and 2 Ling. There were 73 fisherpersons and I think most got their limits. Over the 4 days there were only 5 fish over 30 pounds and 2 of those were measured and released. All caught in close to the kelp beds off Graham Island and the 43 pounder in 17 feet of water!
Our largest Chinook was 18 pounds and I think an average would be around 15 pounds however lots of fish and bait everywhere. I saw bait columns 100 feet thick.
All in all a great experience.
 
Wow that's huge! Back in the late 90s I had a chance to guide Geoff Sanderson and some of his Columbus Blue Jackets team mates on a coho river fishing trip on the Indian River. Nice guy and a good fisherman!
 
The formula we’ve always used is girth squared time the length divided by 750

35.5 x 35.5 = 1260.25 x 49 =
61,752.25, Divided by 800 = 77.1903125
 
The formula we’ve always used is girth squared time the length divided by 750

35.5 x 35.5 = 1260.25 x 49 =
61,752.25, Divided by 800 = 77.1903125

I'd adjust in future when 48" x 35.1" = 62.55 real weight, obviously that formula isn't reliable
 
The formula we’ve always used is girth squared time the length divided by 750

35.5 x 35.5 = 1260.25 x 49 =
61,752.25, Divided by 800 = 77.1903125

Why did you say "divided by 750" in your sentence yet use "Divided by 800" in your math?

Curious.



Take care.
 
Yeah, but somehow the commercial recreational fleet in Haida Gwaii always manages to avoid draconian restrictions.... follow the money! No I don't think they need restricting, but the hypocrisy is hard to swallow!


Perhaps you've forgotten the year when there was no retention of Chinook allowed up there??

I think it was mid 90's..........'96 maybe??

And there is no comparison between what the commercial troll fleet took annually up there compared to the commercial lodges.

I've explained that before so shan't repeat it, but there was a huge difference in numbers caught by each sector when they were compared.





Take care.
 
It was 48” length x 30.5 girth that weighed 62 real weight

You should stick to fishing walleye

Huh? Directly from website:

'A 62.55 pound Chinook salmon with an overall length of 48 inches and a girth of just over 35 inches.'
 
Back
Top