you have 30 days to comment on the new Bill C38 Habitat Provisions in the Gazette

Discussion in 'Conservation, Fishery Politics and Management.' started by agentaqua, Apr 16, 2013.

  1. agentaqua

    agentaqua Well-Known Member

  2. trophywife

    trophywife Well-Known Member

  3. agentaqua

    agentaqua Well-Known Member

    3 big changes to Fisheries Act by Harper and con-men:

    Chinese wait for enbridge approval - bad.

    Kill non-commercial fish - who cares?

    If nobody can prove "seriousness" of habitat alteration - OK.

    Other points:

    Definition: "public good" all up to minister appointed by PM.

    As long as there is no "impacts on competitiveness in the regional, national or international markets" - that's really what matters.

    Substitute "predictible" for "approval to harm".

    Growth and Long-term Prosperity - not refering to you but those with chinese stock portfolio.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2013
  4. Whole in the Water

    Whole in the Water Well-Known Member

    Wow, this sounds like some seriously bad BS the Feds are trying to do here. We need to make a big stink about this one people!!!!
  5. fish stalker

    fish stalker Active Member

    From what I can see its not like we have a option there just stating this is how its going to work now. Like 60 days is enough time to review proposals, it will be like mining proposals, allow,allow,allow.. I think there was someone like the one Copper River headwater one that was denied in bc out of 150 or something.

Share This Page