Where is our Fisheries Minister ??

cohochinook

Well-Known Member
Where is our Federal Fisheries Minister when the Fraser River Sockeye run is collapsing you ask??? Links of have been made to Sea Lice and the collapse of this run. Do you think she's on the Westcoast investigating these concerns. No she's over in Norway at DFO’s aquaculture booth at a trade show for fish farming. You've got to watch this video clip.

http://saveourrivers.tv/dfo_aquanor_hires.html
 
Thanks for the input. Watched the video. So where is our John Duncan while all this is happening. Hope we have an election soon. Tight lines,........BB
 
Write you or call your MP to express your outrage. My MP is John Weston. Write him as he's trying to get Gail Shea out here. Here's John email john@johnweston.ca The phone number to his office is 1-800-665-6004. Let him know your concerns.
 
Why is DFO not fast tracking their science on this issue? All the science so far is from private groups and individuals. The answer; because they would discover that in fact fish farms are killing our wild salmon and then they would have to force their friends and political supporters to clean up their act or face law suits for not fulfilling their #1 mandate to protect wild salmon!! They are buying time for their buddies, at the expense of wild salmon/BC wildlife, commercial/sport/FN fishers and out tourism industry as a whole. Maybe we need Paul Watson to come in and take out the farms in his style! At least it would get the press and public attention and force DFO to act.
 
Very GOOD video..
a must view..
Please take the time and pass it along to your friends.

Lets get the message OUT!

 
Yes, no matter where I worked, if I lost 9 million sockey, I'd be in a lot of sh*t.

Do we, as Canadian Citizens (And Charlie too LOL), have any recourse or means to have our ministers answer for thier actions? Some sort of inquiry or something?

This really makes my blood boil. Salmon farms or not, when 9 million fish go missing, you had better damn well have a legion of biologists and research boats on it.

Last Chance Fishing Adventures

www.lastchancefishingadventures.com
www.swiftsurebank.com
 
LC, the public service is required to respond to public inquiries. So if you contact them (phone or letter) they have to answer. But they don't need to tell you anything meaningful. If you want I can tell you already now exactly what they will answer you...:(
 
quote:Originally posted by chris73

LC, the public service is required to respond to public inquiries. So if you contact them (phone or letter) they have to answer. But they don't need to tell you anything meaningful. If you want I can tell you already now exactly what they will answer you...:(
Unfortunately, you are totally right, Chris73.

What happens is the Fisheries Minister is appointed by the Prime Minister's Office as a patronage appointment, due to his/her past support (of Stephen Harper, in this case). John Cummings got kicked-off the Senate Fisheries Committee by Harper for supporting Belinda Stronach during the last PC leadership debate.

Our system is seriously flawed by even having a Prime Minister's Office, let alone allowing Harper so much power.

Although we are familiar with this process of appointments by the PMO; it doesn't mean it has to be that way - The Government of Nunavut does it quite differently, and it's also a British Parliamentary system.

Instead the elected representatives in the government there choose (by voting) who's going to be the appropriate minister, then vote on who's the next premier, and he appoints those previously chosen ministers.

However, in our current national government - this new naive and PMO-appointed figurehead gets immediately deluged with lobbyists from the aquaculture industry (before they have a chance to see what's really happening); while getting dazzled by the bright lights at the aquaculture promo booth, and while simultaneously getting coached from career bureaucrats like the assistant Deputy Minister, to promote the industry using words like "jobs, jobs, jobs".

Thing is though - job creation and protection is not the fisheries Minister's job, nor is it the job of DFO. Industry Canada, and Agriculture Canada have a mandate here, NOT DFO.

Then when you write a letter about it; it goes to a subordinate in the assistant deputy minister's office. From there it gets answered by cutting and pasting a standard vague non-committal response like "Canada is committed to sustainable aquaculture ", and/or "Fisheries and Oceans Canada is committed to doing all this great science, and blah-blah" - the answers dependent upon which standard meek BS can be pigeon holed into your questions by the assistant.

Putting "sustainable" in front of aquaculture does NOT make it so, but it does make it an oxymoron, while those who repeat this rehearsed rhetoric are also so - less on the "oxy" part, though.

Then on his/her way through the office, the now "answered" stack of letters is signed by the minister and mailed back to you after 3-6 months in process in the office. Don't you feel much better now?

That's what their twisted vision of democracy is.

So, in order to get the minister's attention and by-pass the bureaucratic filters - get you local MP to send in your letters for you. That way, the minister has to at least hear about the dissent.

Mass demonstrations can also create embarrassment, and is NOT the photo-op the PMO office and the DFO minister wants. They are scared of getting embarrassed in public, only</u>.

Otherwise, the people at the top in DFO show no shame or conscience. The middle managers and below are all on anti-depressants to numb the pain - if they still have any conscience left.

Great outfit. They only ones happy are the legions of lawyers they have retained on staff in Ottawa.

The top bureaucrats in DFO should all be charged with treason, as far as I'm concerned.
 
Just got this from Alexandra Morton:

Dear Minister Shea:

On August 26 you sent duplicate letters to many people dismissing the impact of salmon farms on British Columbia. I can only imagine the response to collapse of the world’s largest sockeye salmon river, the Fraser River, has come directly from Ottawa. Your letter provides stark insight into the Federal Conservative government’s course of action.

With an entire ministry at your disposal you told the public:

“The coastwide scope of the decline that has occurred across all Pacific salmon species suggests that this decline is associated with much larger ecological events than localized salmon farming.”

This is entirely inaccurate as there has NOT been a coast-wide collapse across all Pacific salmon species, quite to the contrary. The people of British Columbia are looking at a bull’s-eye collapse pattern with good returns all around the dead center – which is our extremely valuable Fraser River sockeye.

Really interesting – even within the Fraser River, the Harrison sockeye, which scientists report migrate to sea via fish farm-free Strait of Juan de Fuca, are returning at twice the DFO forecast.

The missing Fraser River sockeye salmon were observed as smolts by DFO as they migrated in the river. They were abundant and large. They entered the sea in late spring 2007, turned north into a heavily industrialized salmon farming area, where I examined some of them as they were being infested with sea lice and then they disappeared. These are the only sockeye that collapsed to less than 10% of forecast.

While you are telling the public all salmon species collapsed coast-wide, your highest-ranking BC official is publishing letters in newspapers also telling us that fish farms are not responsible for the collapse because the lice species I and others counted on the young sockeye in 2007 are not found on farm fish. First of all, there were two species of lice on the sockeye smolts, the large salmon louse and the smaller Caligus. Second, the fish farm company on the Fraser sockeye migration route, Marine Harvest, frequently reports Caligus in their website data. Specifically they report 16.5 Caligus per fish for a total of 8 million breeding on the Cyrus Rocks farm early this July as our newest sockeye generation was passing that farm. Because Caligus frequently jump fish to fish this species is also a strong potential disease vector.

As he exonerates fish farms, he goes on to say he will work with First Nations and other fishermen to conserve sockeye. Minster Shea, you closed this fishery at the beginning of the season there has been extremely little fishing on this stock of sockeye. Your Ministry has absolutely no valid scientific or legal reason to omit fish farmers from the investigation and ensuing action to protect the Fraser sockeye.

You also wrote that DFO has “taken significant action…” by “monitoring” farm lice and doing “ocean circulation studies.” These are studies, not “significant action.” Your letter tells people you can’t protect our salmon with closed-containment farms until this is “practical and realistic” for the fish farmers with head offices in Oslo, Norway. Minister Shea, you work for the people of Canada. Your primary mandate is protection of our wild salmon and whatever else is going on in your office no one has rescinded this mandate yet.

History is clearly repeating itself. In 1997, DFO scientists reported that the collapse of Canada’s North Atlantic cod stocks, one of earth’s greatest human food supplies, was because DFO ignored the science, misinformed the public, offered plausible but inaccurate theories, reprimanded scientists who spoke freely and took no action(1). No one in DFO was held accountable when Canadians lost this vast resource. Here in 2009, I would argue you and your department are ignoring the science, misinforming the public, offering plausible but unconfirmed theories and taking no action on a highly documented and obvious factor that reoccurs worldwide wherever there are salmon farms(2). You must be held accountable or it is clear from experience where this is heading.

The Fraser sockeye contribute far more to the economy and employment than salmon farms and they transport ocean nutrients into much of this Province feeding the trees that produce oxygen, remove carbon and help stabilize our climate. An enormous number of British Columbians live in the Fraser watershed and are breathing oxygen produced by salmon fed trees. These are planetary systems we literally cannot live without. First Nation women have written me in anger and anxiety at loosing an essential part of their diet.

The very concept of farming salmon in net pens is unconstitutional in Canada because it attempts to privatize ocean spaces and own schools of salmon in the ocean. The industry appears in violation of many sections of the Fisheries Act. It breaks the natural laws of wild salmon, which never remain stationary. Your record of fish farm defense includes a recent assertion that the industry’s by-catch of wild fish is not a “significant problem.” And you refuse to acknowledge the science and act on the information that the fish farm viral ISA pandemic is spreading in imported salmon eggs(3).

Reading the outpouring of articles, letters to editors, emails to me and the 17,000 signatures thus far on my letter to you asking simply that you enforce the Fisheries Act on salmon farms I don’t think western Canada is ready to loose their fish like eastern Canada. The actions required are simple:


Within your investigation on the fate of our sockeye, require full disclosure of the health and stocking of every salmon farm in BC from 1986 – present and run analysis against health records in enhancement facilities near and distant from salmon farms, including the 2007 salmon farms from Campbell River to Port Hardy.
Close the fish farm fishery on the Fraser migration route just as you have closed commercial and sport fishing.
Apply the Canadian Fisheries Act to fish farms and start laying charges for violations.
Support the Canadian fish farmers who want to reinvent their industry on land, with an eye to siting these facilities in job-starved towns
Ensure that marketing of both farmed and wild salmon is maximized to benefit us all, instead of driving down the price of both
Remove your science branch from the political DFO body and reinstate the Fisheries Research Board - which was a cutting edge, world class, Canadian, scientific powerhouse. Start using, instead of muzzling, your scientists.
Form local area management councils compromised of the people who depend on wild salmon and understand the complexities of their regions.
Apply the phenomenal wealth of science now available to harness the salmon’s own remarkably successful biology to restore our runs.


If you won’t take these steps please resign along with your Pacific Region senior staff and make way for people who will honor Fisheries and Ocean’s contract with the public of Canada, present and future generations, to protect our salmon. The enormous pink salmon return this year – fish that were allowed to go to sea without farm lice, is a clear statement by the fish themselves that British Columbia can have abundant wild salmon, even running through the biggest city in our Province, Vancouver, City of the Salmon

Wild salmon are a gift on a magnitude far greater than any oil well, river power project or the few jobs from a Norwegian industry that imports fish from the south Pacific, throws them in our ocean and pulls out less fish.

Read the list of 17,000 people and counting who have signed my letter www.adopt-a-fry.org &lt;http://www.adopt-a-fry.org&gt; asking that you apply the laws of Canada to salmon farms. They are First Nation chiefs, business people, politicians, entertainers, environmentalists, stream keepers, they are the people of British Columbia, not a fringe group you can brush aside. Minster Shea, you have failed us in your response to the collapse of earth’s largest sockeye salmon run and this is not alright with British Columbia.



Alexandra Morton, R.P. Bio
Echo Bay, BC http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/


1 Hutchings, J.A., Walters, C. and Haedrich, R.L. 1997. Is Scientific Inquiry Incompatible with Government Information Control? Canadian Journal of Aquatic Science. Vol 52.
2 Ford, J.S. and Myers, R.A. 2008 A Global Assessment of Salmon Aquaculture Impacts on Wild Salmonids. PLos Biology 6(2)
3 Vike, S., Nylund, S., and Nylund, A. 2008. ISA virus in Chile: evidence of vertical transmission. Archives of Virology. Vol. 154. (note: “vertical” means via eggs)
 
Wrote to my MLA and got a response. Seems he is on our side.

His response:

Thank you for your recent email concerning our fisheries and the specific issue of fish farming. I appreciate your comments and applaud you on the work you are doing to support sustainable fishing in our community.



As you may know, the Official Opposition has called on the provincial government to halt the development of new fish farms, citing both risks to the environment and wild fish stocks. Robin Austin, NDP MLA for Skeena, chaired an all-party committee that, in May 2007, called for a
ban on salmon farming on the North Coast, a shift to closed containment systems to protect wild salmon, and an expansion of shellfish aquaculture to help First Nations and drive economic development. Government has yet to act of most of these recommendations, even though they have three years to study the report.



I will continue being a vocal opponent to fish farms and appreciate you sharing your view.





Yours sincerely,





John Horgan, MLA

Juan de Fuca
 
Time to re-send letters to your MP in Ottawa, Tips Up. Gordo has thrown in the towel.

http://livingoceans.org/media/news09100901.aspx

Campbell government’s failure to create green aquaculture jobs, abdication of authority leads to new opportunity for the Feds
September 11, 2009

VANCOUVER, SOINTULA, B.C. - Very quietly, with no announcement and no media release, the Government of British Columbia has just relinquished regulatory control of marine fin-fish aquaculture in B.C., handing over jurisdiction to the federal government. Living Oceans Society regards the Province’s abdication as an opportunity for significant change and progress on sustainable aquaculture.

After the investment of millions of taxpayer dollars in a host of hearings, processes and research, and years of failure to act on the multitude of ensuing recommendations to make salmon farming more sustainable, the Campbell government has simply given up on the opportunity to develop new technology and green jobs for B.C.

“If our wild salmon are to survive, the salmon farming industry has to change from low tech open net cage system to high tech closed containment systems,” said Catherine Stewart of Living Oceans Society. “The federal government has already invested in fledgling closed containment ventures in B.C. Now that they will be managing the entire industry, we expect them to follow through with a serious and substantial commitment to protect wild stocks and foster an industry-wide transition to new technology.”

The recent announcement by AgriMarine Industries that their floating tank system, developed with assistance from Sustainable Development Technology Canada, is opening a commercial-scale aquaculture system in China stands as testament to the Campbell government’s failure.

Despite recommendations from the Special Legislative Committee on Sustainable Aquaculture and the multi-million dollar Pacific Salmon forum to invest in closed containment pilots, the Province did nothing. Faced with resolutions from local and regional governments, Chambers of Commerce, letters from retailers seeking more sustainable farmed salmon and support from the world’s largest salmon farming corporation, Marine Harvest, to invest in closed containment – the Province did nothing. Funding to contribute to a pilot program was raised by the Coastal Alliance for Aquaculture Reform and still – the Province did nothing.

“Open net-cage salmon farms, and the lice they breed, may well be a contributing factor in the collapse of this year’s Fraser sockeye run,” said Stewart. “Now that the federal government will have almost exclusive control over the salmon aquaculture industry it’s time for decisive action. China is capitalizing on Canada’s investment in greener technology – our own government must do the same.”

-30-

For more information contact:

Catherine Stewart
Phone: 604-696-5044
Cell: 604-916-6733
 
Back
Top