Whole in the Water
Well-Known Member
Interesting opinion article - the title says it all sadly.... The level of incompetence, corruption and mis-management is truly sickening. Time to defund DFO and let the province take over!
https://ipolitics.ca/2020/10/30/the...D8FQWm52M&mc_cid=ac81828f2c&mc_eid=40977b7a71
Thirty years ago, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) mismanaged the Atlantic cod fishery into near oblivion — ignoring the scientists who foresaw the collapse.
Instead, DFO rigged the science to support an unsustainable commercial fishery. Politicians vowed “never again,” and enshrined the precautionary principle into law — always err on the side of caution — but did nothing to reform the institution responsible for one of the world’s greatest self-inflicted ecological disasters.
Today, DFO does whatever is necessary to support Atlantic salmon farming along B.C.’s coast — to the significant threat of wild Pacific salmon. Only Canada allows the farming of Atlantic salmon on the migration routes of wild Pacific salmon. And, just like 30 years ago, DFO continues to rig science so it can skirt its primary duty to protect B.C.’s iconic keystone species.
In 2009, after conducting a three-year federal inquiry into declining salmon runs, Justice Bruce Cohen saw the essential problem: DFO might ignore fish farming’s risks to promote the industry. Along with 74 other recommendations, he recommended that DFO not be required to both promote and regulate fish farming. But DFO’s conflicted mandate persists.
In 2015, the Federal Court found DFO had not adhered to the precautionary principle — the law of our land — when regulating the foreign Piscine orthoreovirus, saying DFO’s “arguments with respect to the precautionary principle are inconsistent, contradictory and, in any event, fail in light of the evidence.” Four months later, DFO reinstated the same policy, adopting a risk threshold that prohibited only risks that could sterilize entire populations, species, or ecosystems.
The Federal Court again struck down the policy, which DFO reinstated and is before the Federal Court for a third time.
In 2018, the auditor general found DFO was woefully behind in its risk assessments, was not enforcing aquaculture regulations, and was “vulnerable to claims that it prioritized the aquaculture industry over the protection of wild fish.” The same year, Canada’s chief scientist recommended DFO have unbiased advice from an external advisory committee. Still, no external oversight exists.
In December 2019, our prime minister mandated DFO’s minister to transition B.C.’s “in ocean” salmon farms onto land by 2025. Welcome words. But, almost a year later, British Columbians and the 102 B.C. First Nations who support this transition have seen no action by DFO.
Cohen also recommended fish farming in the Discovery Islands (a bottleneck for migrating salmon) be prohibited by Sept. 30, 2020, unless DFO could confidently say the farms there posed less than minimal harm to wild Pacific salmon.
On Sept. 28, with the Fraser River experiencing the worst sockeye returns in history, and with the minister absent, DFO officials proclaimed that the Discovery Island fish farms posed less than a one per cent risk to Fraser River sockeye. They did not explain how they calculated this risk, nor how their conclusion factored into the prime minister’s mandate to transition the open-net pens by 2025. They did admit, in response to a question, that they had not included sea lice from fish farms in their assessment. Well-established science shows that sea lice from fish farms kill out-migrating juvenile salmon.
Just four days earlier, John Reynolds, an aquatic ecologist at Simon Fraser University, and chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada — which is responsible for designating endangered species — said: “We have an overwhelming weight of evidence from research coming at this from all different directions. The current open-net-pen fish-farm model that we have is not compatible with protecting wild fish.”
We can be thankful that one of DFO’s top scientists is speaking out. Kristi Miller-Saunders, head of DFO’s molecular genetics laboratory in Nanaimo, B.C., and an adjunct professor at the University of British Columbia, described how DFO’s dual role as regulator and industry advocate, coupled with its reliance on industry funding for research, skews risk assessments in favour of the fish-farm industry.
Let’s watch what happens to Miller-Saunders now.
In the 10 years DFO has regulated fish farming in B.C., a former B.C. Supreme Court judge, two Federal Court judges, the auditor general’s office, Canada’s chief scientist, DFO’s own scientists, B.C. First Nations, and numerous NGOs have all sounded the alarm. But so far, the politicians have done nothing to reform the institution mismanaging wild Pacific salmon to extinction. Our leaders must act now and not wait to say, “never again,” again.
Tony Allard is the chairman of Wild Salmon Forever.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by all iPolitics columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of iPolitics.
https://ipolitics.ca/2020/10/30/the...D8FQWm52M&mc_cid=ac81828f2c&mc_eid=40977b7a71
The biggest threat to wild Pacific salmon is Fisheries and Oceans Canada
By Tony Allard. Published on Oct 30, 2020 3:54pmThirty years ago, the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) mismanaged the Atlantic cod fishery into near oblivion — ignoring the scientists who foresaw the collapse.
Instead, DFO rigged the science to support an unsustainable commercial fishery. Politicians vowed “never again,” and enshrined the precautionary principle into law — always err on the side of caution — but did nothing to reform the institution responsible for one of the world’s greatest self-inflicted ecological disasters.
Today, DFO does whatever is necessary to support Atlantic salmon farming along B.C.’s coast — to the significant threat of wild Pacific salmon. Only Canada allows the farming of Atlantic salmon on the migration routes of wild Pacific salmon. And, just like 30 years ago, DFO continues to rig science so it can skirt its primary duty to protect B.C.’s iconic keystone species.
In 2009, after conducting a three-year federal inquiry into declining salmon runs, Justice Bruce Cohen saw the essential problem: DFO might ignore fish farming’s risks to promote the industry. Along with 74 other recommendations, he recommended that DFO not be required to both promote and regulate fish farming. But DFO’s conflicted mandate persists.
In 2015, the Federal Court found DFO had not adhered to the precautionary principle — the law of our land — when regulating the foreign Piscine orthoreovirus, saying DFO’s “arguments with respect to the precautionary principle are inconsistent, contradictory and, in any event, fail in light of the evidence.” Four months later, DFO reinstated the same policy, adopting a risk threshold that prohibited only risks that could sterilize entire populations, species, or ecosystems.
The Federal Court again struck down the policy, which DFO reinstated and is before the Federal Court for a third time.
In 2018, the auditor general found DFO was woefully behind in its risk assessments, was not enforcing aquaculture regulations, and was “vulnerable to claims that it prioritized the aquaculture industry over the protection of wild fish.” The same year, Canada’s chief scientist recommended DFO have unbiased advice from an external advisory committee. Still, no external oversight exists.
In December 2019, our prime minister mandated DFO’s minister to transition B.C.’s “in ocean” salmon farms onto land by 2025. Welcome words. But, almost a year later, British Columbians and the 102 B.C. First Nations who support this transition have seen no action by DFO.
Cohen also recommended fish farming in the Discovery Islands (a bottleneck for migrating salmon) be prohibited by Sept. 30, 2020, unless DFO could confidently say the farms there posed less than minimal harm to wild Pacific salmon.
On Sept. 28, with the Fraser River experiencing the worst sockeye returns in history, and with the minister absent, DFO officials proclaimed that the Discovery Island fish farms posed less than a one per cent risk to Fraser River sockeye. They did not explain how they calculated this risk, nor how their conclusion factored into the prime minister’s mandate to transition the open-net pens by 2025. They did admit, in response to a question, that they had not included sea lice from fish farms in their assessment. Well-established science shows that sea lice from fish farms kill out-migrating juvenile salmon.
Just four days earlier, John Reynolds, an aquatic ecologist at Simon Fraser University, and chair of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada — which is responsible for designating endangered species — said: “We have an overwhelming weight of evidence from research coming at this from all different directions. The current open-net-pen fish-farm model that we have is not compatible with protecting wild fish.”
We can be thankful that one of DFO’s top scientists is speaking out. Kristi Miller-Saunders, head of DFO’s molecular genetics laboratory in Nanaimo, B.C., and an adjunct professor at the University of British Columbia, described how DFO’s dual role as regulator and industry advocate, coupled with its reliance on industry funding for research, skews risk assessments in favour of the fish-farm industry.
Let’s watch what happens to Miller-Saunders now.
In the 10 years DFO has regulated fish farming in B.C., a former B.C. Supreme Court judge, two Federal Court judges, the auditor general’s office, Canada’s chief scientist, DFO’s own scientists, B.C. First Nations, and numerous NGOs have all sounded the alarm. But so far, the politicians have done nothing to reform the institution mismanaging wild Pacific salmon to extinction. Our leaders must act now and not wait to say, “never again,” again.
Tony Allard is the chairman of Wild Salmon Forever.
The views, opinions and positions expressed by all iPolitics columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of iPolitics.
