Minimal risk to wild Fraser River sockeye due to pathogen transfer from BC Salmon Farms

The coho story is a loss of habitat this is well known. Coho often spawn in very small streams. These streams are being developed around constantly and in lots of cases being destroyed by development. Dfo budget was massively cut and they basically now just auto approve developments with never visiting the site of development. This is a totally different subject but sports fishmen conveniently like to use it to show how they sports fishing is not making an impact.

That's just what the DFO biologist who is retired now told me.

Well that's odd because PSF is telling a different story completely. They say the smolt to adult return ratio is the problem. In fact the wild coho have a better ratio than the hatchery ones and they don't even live in the river. At one time the hatchery coho had a return ratio of 15% now if we are lucky and everything works out perfect it's closer to 5%. Most years we are lucky to see 2% and some years it's below 1%. So to say it's the river means you don't know.
 
Well that's odd because PSF is telling a different story completely. They say the smolt to adult return ratio is the problem. In fact the wild coho have a better ratio than the hatchery ones and they don't even live in the river. At one time the hatchery coho had a return ratio of 15% now if we are lucky and everything works out perfect it's closer to 5%. Most years we are lucky to see 2% and some years it's below 1%. So to say it's the river means you don't know.

Thanks GLG for outlining the importance on studying ocean conditions, Yet when i look into it i see no mention of fish farms?

September 2017

Ocean conditions for salmon headed to sea this year are very poor, according to recent NOAA Fisheries research surveys, and have a high likelihood of depressing salmon returns to the Columbia River in the next few years.

The outlook is described in a recent research memorandum from NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC), which has been studying the ecology of young salmon entering the ocean for more than 20 years. The research has helped reveal how conditions in the ocean affect salmon survival and, ultimately, how many salmon complete their life cycle to return to their home streams and spawn a new generation of fish.

cpue.png


NOAA Fisheries research surveys off the Pacific Northwest this year turned up among the fewest juvenile salmon of any of the last 20 years, an indication that many of the young fish that migrated to the ocean did not survive. Graphic: Northwest Fisheries Science Center

NOAA Fisheries researchers regularly survey ocean conditions off the Pacific Northwest Coast, focusing especially on factors known as “ocean indicators” that can serve as barometers of salmon survival. They also assess the number and condition of juvenile salmon along the Oregon and Washington coastlines, since the survival of the fish during their first months at sea helps predict how many are likely to survive over the longer term.

NOAA Fisheries’ many years of ocean research have helped scientists develop online charts of ocean indicators that display the forecast for salmon returns in coming years. In the last few years the indicators have turned largely negative for Columbia River salmon, in large part because of unusually warm ocean temperatures, including the “warm blob,” a large swath of warm water that encompassed much of the West Coast beginning in 2013.

sst-anom.png


A 2016 map illustrates sea surface temperatures, with darker red representing temperatures farther above average. Unusually warm waters have encompassed much of the West Coast in recent years, affecting the marine ecosystem. Graphic: NOAA/ESRL/PSD

“This is not just about salmon, however, it’s about an ocean ecosystem that is changing in ways that affect salmon and everything else out there,” said David Huff, manager of the NWFSC’s Estuarine and Ocean Ecology Program. “Remote methods of detecting changes to the ecosystem did not highlight the poor ocean conditions this year. For example, the warm blob has dissipated, so satellite imagery shows near-normal sea surface temperatures. It was only by getting out on the water and sampling directly that we were able to identify and describe local biological indicators.”

Researchers’ catch of juvenile salmon this year was among the lowest in the last 20 years, suggesting that the early survival of young fish was unusually low. Catches of other species such as smelt, herring, and anchovy were also low, a sign that predators such as seabirds near the mouth of the Columbia may have had to rely more heavily on young salmon just entering the ocean.

Surveys in recent years have also turned up record numbers of warmer-water species such as Pacific pompano and jack mackerel that previously had been scarce off the Pacific Northwest coast. Increased abundance of these warm-water species can have direct and indirect ecological impacts on salmon.

pompano-and-mackerel.png


In contrast to salmon, the warm-water species Pacific pompano and jack mackerel have appeared in research nets in record numbers in the past few years. Jack mackerel often prey on juvenile salmon. Graphic: Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Moreover, warm ocean waters typically carry plankton with less of the fatty nutrients that young salmon need to thrive when they first go to sea, starving the food web from the bottom up. This year researchers noted that chlorophyll, which is a barometer of the plankton that helps sustain higher trophic levels, was at its lowest levels in 20 years.

At the same time, tiny marine crustaceans called copepods that signal favorable conditions for salmon have remained at low levels since 2014, researchers said.

The results indicate that salmon fisheries may face some lean times in the next few years. Biologists will report on 2017 salmon returns later this year, and will issue forecasts for 2018 in early March. Those forecasts will help shape expectations for 2018 fishing seasons.

“While the news is not good, this new information helps us anticipate what’s coming,” said NWFSC Director Kevin Werner. “We cannot change what the ocean is doing in the short term but this scientific information can help us make good decisions about how best to manage and protect salmon in light of these adverse conditions.”

The findings underscore the vast influence the ocean exerts over salmon survival and the importance of providing salmon with healthy freshwater habitat so they can weather poor ocean conditions and take advantage of favorable conditions when they return. That is a central focus of NOAA Fisheries’ recovery plans for threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead.

“As difficult as it is for salmon right now, tribes, watershed groups, and others across the region have worked hard to improve freshwater salmon habitat,” said Michael Tehan, Assistant Regional Administrator for the Interior Columbia Basin Office of NOAA Fisheries’ West Coast Region. “That’s essential for sustaining salmon through these tough times so they can rebound when ocean conditions support it.”

For more information:

Salmon Returns and Ocean Conditions (NWFSC fact sheet)

http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/stories/2017/09062017_lean_times_salmon.html
 
Well that's odd because PSF is telling a different story completely. They say the smolt to adult return ratio is the problem. In fact the wild coho have a better ratio than the hatchery ones and they don't even live in the river. At one time the hatchery coho had a return ratio of 15% now if we are lucky and everything works out perfect it's closer to 5%. Most years we are lucky to see 2% and some years it's below 1%. So to say it's the river means you don't know.

Nobody is denying ocean survival is not the main driver for salmonid productivity, but when you consider how many coho stocks have been extirpated or severely depressed due to habitat destruction, your argument becomes weak. As wild smolts do far better than hatchery fish, it simply makes sense that if habitat can be improved to increase smolt numbers, all things being equal, adult numbers will increase.

2% ocean survival of 1000 migrants is better than 2% ocean survival of fewer smolts.
 
Thanks GLG for outlining the importance on studying ocean conditions, Yet when i look into it i see no mention of fish farms?

September 2017

Ocean conditions for salmon headed to sea this year are very poor, according to recent NOAA Fisheries research surveys, and have a high likelihood of depressing salmon returns to the Columbia River in the next few years.

The outlook is described in a recent research memorandum from NOAA Fisheries’ Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC), which has been studying the ecology of young salmon entering the ocean for more than 20 years. The research has helped reveal how conditions in the ocean affect salmon survival and, ultimately, how many salmon complete their life cycle to return to their home streams and spawn a new generation of fish.

cpue.png


NOAA Fisheries research surveys off the Pacific Northwest this year turned up among the fewest juvenile salmon of any of the last 20 years, an indication that many of the young fish that migrated to the ocean did not survive. Graphic: Northwest Fisheries Science Center

NOAA Fisheries researchers regularly survey ocean conditions off the Pacific Northwest Coast, focusing especially on factors known as “ocean indicators” that can serve as barometers of salmon survival. They also assess the number and condition of juvenile salmon along the Oregon and Washington coastlines, since the survival of the fish during their first months at sea helps predict how many are likely to survive over the longer term.

NOAA Fisheries’ many years of ocean research have helped scientists develop online charts of ocean indicators that display the forecast for salmon returns in coming years. In the last few years the indicators have turned largely negative for Columbia River salmon, in large part because of unusually warm ocean temperatures, including the “warm blob,” a large swath of warm water that encompassed much of the West Coast beginning in 2013.

sst-anom.png


A 2016 map illustrates sea surface temperatures, with darker red representing temperatures farther above average. Unusually warm waters have encompassed much of the West Coast in recent years, affecting the marine ecosystem. Graphic: NOAA/ESRL/PSD

“This is not just about salmon, however, it’s about an ocean ecosystem that is changing in ways that affect salmon and everything else out there,” said David Huff, manager of the NWFSC’s Estuarine and Ocean Ecology Program. “Remote methods of detecting changes to the ecosystem did not highlight the poor ocean conditions this year. For example, the warm blob has dissipated, so satellite imagery shows near-normal sea surface temperatures. It was only by getting out on the water and sampling directly that we were able to identify and describe local biological indicators.”

Researchers’ catch of juvenile salmon this year was among the lowest in the last 20 years, suggesting that the early survival of young fish was unusually low. Catches of other species such as smelt, herring, and anchovy were also low, a sign that predators such as seabirds near the mouth of the Columbia may have had to rely more heavily on young salmon just entering the ocean.

Surveys in recent years have also turned up record numbers of warmer-water species such as Pacific pompano and jack mackerel that previously had been scarce off the Pacific Northwest coast. Increased abundance of these warm-water species can have direct and indirect ecological impacts on salmon.

pompano-and-mackerel.png


In contrast to salmon, the warm-water species Pacific pompano and jack mackerel have appeared in research nets in record numbers in the past few years. Jack mackerel often prey on juvenile salmon. Graphic: Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Moreover, warm ocean waters typically carry plankton with less of the fatty nutrients that young salmon need to thrive when they first go to sea, starving the food web from the bottom up. This year researchers noted that chlorophyll, which is a barometer of the plankton that helps sustain higher trophic levels, was at its lowest levels in 20 years.

At the same time, tiny marine crustaceans called copepods that signal favorable conditions for salmon have remained at low levels since 2014, researchers said.

The results indicate that salmon fisheries may face some lean times in the next few years. Biologists will report on 2017 salmon returns later this year, and will issue forecasts for 2018 in early March. Those forecasts will help shape expectations for 2018 fishing seasons.

“While the news is not good, this new information helps us anticipate what’s coming,” said NWFSC Director Kevin Werner. “We cannot change what the ocean is doing in the short term but this scientific information can help us make good decisions about how best to manage and protect salmon in light of these adverse conditions.”

The findings underscore the vast influence the ocean exerts over salmon survival and the importance of providing salmon with healthy freshwater habitat so they can weather poor ocean conditions and take advantage of favorable conditions when they return. That is a central focus of NOAA Fisheries’ recovery plans for threatened and endangered salmon and steelhead.

“As difficult as it is for salmon right now, tribes, watershed groups, and others across the region have worked hard to improve freshwater salmon habitat,” said Michael Tehan, Assistant Regional Administrator for the Interior Columbia Basin Office of NOAA Fisheries’ West Coast Region. “That’s essential for sustaining salmon through these tough times so they can rebound when ocean conditions support it.”

For more information:

Salmon Returns and Ocean Conditions (NWFSC fact sheet)

http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/stories/2017/09062017_lean_times_salmon.html

Thanks for the info and yes I have read this before. We all know that some years are not good for survival of salmon but what is important to watch the trends over many years not just one year to try to prove your point. May I suggest you read this study by DFO about coho in the SoG. Look at Black Creek as that is an indicator stream and is only wild coho. see page 209.
http://waves-vagues.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/365564.pdf
 
Nobody is denying ocean survival is not the main driver for salmonid productivity, but when you consider how many coho stocks have been extirpated or severely depressed due to habitat destruction, your argument becomes weak. As wild smolts do far better than hatchery fish, it simply makes sense that if habitat can be improved to increase smolt numbers, all things being equal, adult numbers will increase.

2% ocean survival of 1000 migrants is better than 2% ocean survival of fewer smolts.
I really don't know what to say about this Dave but I will say this..... I would like our rivers to have a smolt to adult ratio back to where it was in the past. The system that I worked on is trying to increase the smolt carrying capacity so that we do produce more smolt to offset the lack of survival. There is only so much we can do as it's very expensive to create new habitat so that more wild smolts go out in the spring.

As for hatcheries ..... yes we could increase production but there is a limit as to what you can produce. Labour and food cost as well as how much water is available has its limits. For me the best outcome would be to improve the smolt to adult ratio as the cost is the same and the result would be more adults back to the system. That's what we all want at the end of it right.
 
Absolutely glg but how do you explain the incrediblely strong chum returns to the Fraser River then.

Wasn’t there a big crash of salmon in the 70’s? Is the ocean cyclical? Is there it lean times and rich times?
 
Last edited:
Absolutely glg but how do you explain the incrediblely strong chum returns to the Fraser River then.

Wasn’t there a big crash of salmon in the 70’s? Is the ocean cyclical? Is there it lean times and rich times?
You mean the chum returns for 2016 that were great or the chum returns for 2017 that were a bust. Yes we live from year to year looking at returns a wonder why. The important thing to do is to step back and look at the long term trend. That's why I watch coho and Chinook and I pay attention to the ratio of smolt to adult survival. Watching just how many adults return is a very noisy signal. It may not give you the complete picture of what is going on. Watching that ratio may not be perfect but it does lessen the noise of good and bad years. Read that paper and think on it for a while.
 
2016 was amazing and 2017 was good and still well above the long term average for the Fraser.

ALBCHM2016_Oct26_HistoricalCorrect_27702_image002.png


I like to look at chum because they do not have much commercial value so they aren’t subject to much fishing. they are to small when they leave so seals don’t pray on them. They will spawn in any mud hole ditch available. They bring the most biomass back to our forests.

Chum are not on anyone’s radar and yet seem to be doing quite well in the Fraser River.
 
Last edited:
It's the lol, snub your nose in the air attitudes like that, which are why your industry will never get any sympathy from me or many other members of the public... so laugh away at something as serious as pathogenic disease and virus from open net pen fish farms on our wild salmon migratory routes.... just a laughing matter to many fish farm supporters as you've shown.

I think it was because of all the cut and pasting (which I wonder how much of it you truly understand) plus the fact you didn’t listen to me before on this. See where it got you. Since the 2003 IHN outbreak, the BC fish farm industry employed new bio security protocols, monitoring, detection, and fish movement practices (including 3rd party vessel operating practices), on-site culling of farmed fish on impacted farm and a variety of other measures. They did these changes because IHNv is a very high risk pathogen and it was getting unintentionally passed to adjacent farms through shared equipment and vessels. In addition, there was a lag time (up to 2 weeks) between initial detection of impacted farmed fish and CFIA confirmation of the virus. Well in that amount of time the virus and resulting disease (IHN) can spread quite rapidly - potentially impacting adjacent farm creating more losses. This is what happened in 2003. Following the 2003 outbreak, the industry is much more proactive and will destroy impacted and non impacted farmed fish once they detect it and not wait for CFIA confirmation. This is one of the reason why IHNv transmission from farmed salmon to Fraser Sockeye salmon was determined to be minimal risk. Compensation under the legislation is provided if the CFIA orders that the stock is to be destroyed - not if the impacted farm decides to be proactive and do it before the order is given.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/compensation-set-for-bc-bird-farmers/article18266705/

https://www.canadianpoultrymag.com/business-policy/who-pays-for-an-ai-crisis-30009

http://www.inspection.gc.ca/animals.../compensation/eng/1313712524829/1313712773700

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/farms+netted+million+compensation+diseased+fish/9788388/story.html
 
Thanks for the post, nice to see the east coast doesn't see the same problems as here and are expanding.....
Man... 150 million, they must be doing something right...
 
The US is years ahead of us when it come to progessive aquaculture policies and practices. Maybe Almo needs to spend more time in her country of birth to set this travesty right, lol!
 
European company plans $150 million salmon farm in Maine
By Christopher Cousins, BDN Staff • January 30, 2018 10:11 am
Updated: January 30, 2018
http://bangordailynews.com/2018/01/...mpany-plans-150-million-salmon-farm-in-maine/

Wow 150 million and built to expand to 500 million...... now that's some serious money.

"BELFAST, Maine — A Norwegian aquaculture company plans to build one of the world’s largest indoor salmon farms on the Maine coast.

Nordic Aquafarms wants to build a $150 million facility on 40 acres off Route 1 on the outskirts of Belfast. It would be the most significant investment Waldo County has seen in decades. Total investment through all phases of the project could top $500 million, according to the company."

I'm glad that Bones and Dave can see that..... well done guy's

Bones said:
Thanks for the post, nice to see the east coast doesn't see the same problems as here and are expanding.....
Man... 150 million, they must be doing something right...

Dave said:
The US is years ahead of us when it come to progessive aquaculture policies and practices.
 
I guess Dave and Bones (along with just about everyone else) can see where the future of Fish Farming belongs.
They wont have to worry about the Farm to Farm infections of IHN as was the case in 2003 like Schuswap pointed out.

I agree with Dave and Bones on this one. Its a win win and they are years ahead of us. But hopefully, we'll be closing that gap real soon!
 
I guess Dave and Bones (along with just about everyone else) can see where the future of Fish Farming belongs.
They wont have to worry about the Farm to Farm infections of IHN as was the case in 2003 like Schuswap pointed out.

I agree with Dave and Bones on this one. Its a win win and they are years ahead of us. But hopefully, we'll be closing that gap real soon!
No sea lice infestation problems either when they raise the farm fish on land.
 
yeah, I was pissed till I realized it was an indoor aquaculture facility...
Thanks for the post, nice to see the east coast doesn't see the same problems as here and are expanding.....
Man... 150 million, they must be doing something right...

Yeah, They're doing it on land...
... pharmaceutical free, lice free, guilt free salmon coming soon to a grocery store near you... Looks like we're falling behind as a country when the US is seeing the writing on the wall in regards to atlantic salmon aquaculture.
 
Last edited:
The US is years ahead of us when it come to progessive aquaculture policies and practices. Maybe Almo needs to spend more time in her country of birth to set this travesty right, lol!
Yes, it is looking more and more like they are years ahead of us in atlantic salmon aquaculture. Tearing down their open net pen disease and virus spreading farms, and going to RAS closed containment systems. Not sure what Alexandra Morton would see as a travesty in that. Pretty sure she sees the damage from disease, virus, etc from the open net pen farms on our wild salmon migratorry routes as the travesty that is and has been reeking havoc on our wild salmon runs here in BC for decades as her main objective in fighting.

Good luck to Nordic Aquafarms, Atlantic Saphire and the other RAS closed containment system companies that are online or coming online in the future.
And **** on the open net pen companies and government facilitators that continue to put the future of our wild salmon in jeopardy.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top