Juvenile Salmon Usage of the Skeena River Estuary

agentaqua

Well-Known Member
Juvenile Salmon Usage of the Skeena River Estuary
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118988

Abstract

Migratory salmon transit estuary habitats on their way out to the ocean but this phase of their life cycle is more poorly understood than other phases. The estuaries of large river systems in particular may support many populations and several species of salmon that originate from throughout the upstream river. The Skeena River of British Columbia, Canada, is a large river system with high salmon population- and species-level diversity. The estuary of the Skeena River is under pressure from industrial development, with two gas liquefaction terminals and a potash loading facility in various stages of environmental review processes, providing motivation for understanding the usage of the estuary by juvenile salmon. We conducted a juvenile salmonid sampling program throughout the Skeena River estuary in 2007 and 2013 to investigate the spatial and temporal distribution of different species and populations of salmon. We captured six species of juvenile anadromous salmonids throughout the estuary in both years, and found that areas proposed for development support some of the highest abundances of some species of salmon. Specifically, the highest abundances of sockeye (both years), Chinook in 2007, and coho salmon in 2013 were captured in areas proposed for development. For example, juvenile sockeye salmon were 2–8 times more abundant in the proposed development areas. Genetic stock assignment demonstrated that the Chinook salmon and most of the sockeye salmon that were captured originated from throughout the Skeena watershed, while some sockeye salmon came from the Nass, Stikine, Southeast Alaska, and coastal systems on the northern and central coasts of British Columbia. These fish support extensive commercial, recreational, and First Nations fisheries throughout the Skeena River and beyond. Our results demonstrate that estuary habitats integrate species and population diversity of salmon, and that if proposed development negatively affects the salmon populations that use the estuary, then numerous fisheries would also be negatively affected.
 
Awesome article! Exactly why we don't need anymore development up in that region. Aside from the major spill concerns, its the little spills that will add up and have major consequences... 1% loss of a salmon population makes a huge difference as such a small percentage survive to return to begin with. Ensuring these estuarine habitats remain healthy and actually help to support the fish at early stages is crucial to maintaining healthy stock for us to enjoy catching! Great post!
 
I agree Stoisy.

As industrialized areas in ports and estuaries get more industrialized - the remaining habitat gets MORE important verses LESS important - since there is no more "choice" left. IF we are to actually have a true environmental assessment - verses the dog n pony show that Harper's buddies want and seem to get - we need to ensure there are MORE verses LESS checks and balances - which is what Harper does NOT want.

Hence the Omnibus bills - a tactic employed by bullies in suits.
 
http://www.vancouversun.com/busines...thWest+halted+second+time/10881407/story.html

Federal review of Pacific NorthWest LNG halted a second time

Company asked for more information on effects on B.C. salmon-rearing habitat

BY GORDON HOEKSTRA, VANCOUVER SUN MARCH 11, 2015

Federal review of Pacific NorthWest LNG halted a second time

A federal environmental agency is concerned about kelp beds used by juvenile salmon just off the site of the proposed Pacific Northwest LNG plant, Lelu Island, near Port Edward,

Photograph by: www.lonniewishart.com , Vancouver Sun
A federal review of Pacific NorthWest LNG has been halted again, as the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency seeks more information on effects on sensitive salmon-rearing habitat.

This second stop in the review could delay a decision on the project by the federal agency until July or August. The project already has B.C. approval.

It could also delay a final investment decision by Malaysia’s state-controlled Petronas, the lead player in the liquefied natural gas export project. Total costs for the LNG terminal, pipeline and work to extract natural gas in northwest B.C. are estimated at $36 billion.

Petronas had said it would make a final investment decision before the end of last year, but recently said the decision would come in June, about the same time the federal review was supposed to be completed.

The assessment agency said it sent a letter to Pacific NorthWest LNG on Feb. 23, seeking more information to determine whether the project is likely to cause significant environmental effects. “The information requested pertains to the project’s potential effects on sediment transport and hydrodynamic changes, and associated effects to fish and fish habitat at Flora Bank, near the Skeena River,” said spokeswoman Karen Fish said in a written statement.

Hydrodynamic changes refer to water movements in the ocean.

Flora Bank contains eelgrass beds considered critical habitat for juvenile salmon. The bank is just off Lelu Island, where the project will be built adjacent to Port Edward in northwest B.C.

Nearly three weeks have elapsed since the halt of the review.

Pacific NorthWest LNG spokesman Spencer Sproule said he couldn’t comment on whether a project decision would be delayed, saying the length of the review halt is an assessment agency decision.

“The only thing we can do it get the work that is requested of us done as quickly as possible, but as best as possible,” said Sproule.

The federal review was also halted last year after First Nations, federal agencies and the public raised concerns about a jetty that would be built over Flora Bank.

Concerns had also been raised about dredging and depositing that material in the vicinity of the salmon-rearing area.

The company filed new plans to build a 1.6-kilometre suspension bridge over the Flora Bank and move the berth for the LNG carriers farther from Lelu Island so that no dredging is required.

“Construction of the bridge will eliminate most project infrastructure (such as piles to support the jetty) and construction activities on Flora Bank,” noted the changes filed by Pacific NorthWest LNG in December.

ghoekstra@vancouversun.com

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/Federal...second+time/10881407/story.html#ixzz3UD95XzJh
 
http://www.propellerstrategy.org/lng_cooling_system

Will Woodfibre LNG's cooling system threaten herring?

Posted by Stan Proboszcz 115sc on April 17, 2015

Herring_Spawn_Woodfibre_in_background_photo_credit_John_Buchanan.jpgMany locals say Howe Sound is recovering from its industrial past. Sightings of marine mammals are on the rise. So, why are they returning? Well, ecology is complex; but, many think the return of a little fishy may have something to do with it.

Enter—the Pacific herring.

Herring are foundational to marine food webs. They feed everything from sea birds to seals, dolphins to humpbacks, coho to Chinook salmon. It’s no wonder Orca—wolves of the sea—are doing rounds in the Sound.

However, the story isn’t over yet. This real-life story also has an antagonist.

Enter—Woodfibre LNG, a proposed liquefied natural gas plant to be sited across from Porteau Cove Provincial Park, along the Sea-to-Sky Highway.

say-no-button2.jpg

If this LNG plant is approved, Howe Sound will see about 40 tankers plough her waters per year. Road trips along the scenic Sea-to-Sky will be marred by an industrial complex and flare stack. And Squamish’s beloved estuary may go under the knife to accommodate an underground pipeline.

But there’s another impact just below the surface

Herring_larvae__Howe_Sound_credit_John_Buchanan.jpgLNG plants transform natural gas to liquid to facilitate shipping in tankers. This uses massive amounts of energy, which in turn produces heat that needs dissipation. The proposed plant will use a marine cooling system. From our read of the Environmental Assessment application, about 17,000 tonnes of water per hour will be drawn through an intake pipe 27 metres below the water’s surface. It’ll cool the plant and be returned to Howe Sound, hot and chlorinated.

Outreach material produced by Woodfibre LNG state, “the intake will be located in deep water (over 25 metres), well below the layer where marine organisms including herring larvae and juvenile salmonids are found in the greatest numbers.” This 25 metre depth is recommended by federal guidelines.

After a cursory look at the 1991 guidelines document (1), troubling issues rise to the surface:
•The guidelines state marine intakes can have “severe impacts on marine resources.” Juvenile crabs, prawn, shrimp, herring eggs and larvae are particularly vulnerable. Marine animals are typically caught against screens by the suction or sucked into the intake and die.
•The guidelines omit research on baby herring (i.e., larvae) migrations. Baby herring are weak swimmers and are greatly influenced by currents—and intakes. Not much is known about Pacific herring migrations up and down in the water column. Research shows Atlantic herring—a close relative—do congregate as deep as 40 metres, following prey (2). Hence, we’re not convinced the 25 metre federal guideline is safe and founded in the most recent science.
•In conversation with retired federal Fisheries and Oceans senior scientist, Dr. Richard Beamish, we learned it’s not unusual to find significant numbers of juvenile salmon and herring at depths greater than 25 metres. He would know, being involved in large-scale fish surveys in Georgia Strait and Howe Sound.
•The guidelines recommend a minimum of 2 kilometres between an intake and a documented herring spawning area. “Distances less than 2 km could pose a serious risk to herring and other marine fish larvae.” John Buchanan, a local naturalist, documented an abundance of herring spawn well within 2 km of the Woodfibre site in February and March (3). Over the years, he’s witnessed spawn within 100 feet of Woodfibre.

2011-03-25_--1800k_---eyed-Herring-eggs-on-Bladder-kelp_-Woodfiber-B.C.--(2).jpgIs this how our government builds a “World Class” LNG industry?

Recent research highlights the risk of two proposed LNG plants to Skeena River fish stocks, even though at least one of them will avoid a marine intake (4). The plant proposed by Petronas will use an air-cooling system and avoid a marine intake. Doesn’t Howe Sound deserve the same level of precaution?

In 2010, California adopted new regulations that require plants to stop using "once-through" cooling systems (5). The State Water Board says they are “dangerous to marine life” and kill millions of marine animals every year.

Is this cooling system classified as dangerous in California, but “World Class” in BC? Why haven’t the 1991 federal guidelines for marine intakes been updated and brought into the 21st Century? Are the costs for modern technology and a sustainable LNG industry too grand? Will Howe Sound end up paying these costs in dead fish? Well, the story isn’t over yet.

Enter—the Engaged Citizen, who’s hopeful, strong and cares about BC’s future.

Although the proposed Woodfibre LNG plant is undergoing a provincial environmental assessment, the federal government must also make a decision on the project this summer. And as you know, a federal election is scheduled for October. Get the picture?

If enough people express displeasure with Woodfibre LNG to local MPs, they will get nervous about their party approving an unpopular project leading up to an election. With the Mount Polly disaster and English Bay spill still in our rear-view, many British Columbians have had enough World Class lip service. Help protect Howe Sound and its magnificence. Please sign the Declaration to Protect Howe Sound. We’ll take it to local federal candidates in region. Big and little fish will thank you for it.

Stan Proboszcz and Dave Brown, photos by John Buchanan

Survey-button.jpg

References

(1) 1991 Federal Guidelines for Minimizing Entrainment and Impingement of Aquatic Organisms at Marine Intakes in British Columbia http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/dfo-mpo/Fs97-4-2098E.pdf
•Page 3 –Distance Criterion: “Do not site intakes at or near herring spawning areas that show historical spawning over time. Allow a minimum of 2 km between an intake structure and a documented herring spawing area. Distances less than 2 km could pose a serious risk to herring”
•Page 4 – Depth Criterion: “Install screened stationary intakes at a minimum depth of 25 m below the zero tide level. This guideline is in addition to not siting marine intakes near sensitive fish larval areas.”
•Page 1 – No studies statement: “In British Columbia, no studies on entrainment in seawater intakes have been conducted because the region has no nuclear power plants and few operating marine intakes for other industries.”

(2) Research highlighting depth migrations of Atlantic herring to 40 metres, synopsis: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00001025#page-1

(3) Videos of 2015 herring spawn near Woodfibre LNG videos, by John Buchanan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv355CBG4e4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP5d0uLgB64

(4) Research highlights LNG risk to Skeena River: http://www.vancouverobserver.com/ne...ld-collapse-bc-wild-salmon-run-sfu-scientists

(5) California State Water Board phase out of harmful marine intakes: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/publications_forms/publications/factsheets/docs/oncethroughcooling.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Animation of the Invisible Migration
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WTocQAAarEU?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
that's a really good article in post 8. I enjoyed reading it. I hope more people read it as its well worth reading. amazing what some of these large corporations try to get away with... mind boggling actually.... and our liberal government goes along with it wholeheartedly. profits and short term gain for the few over the environment and anything else in its way... and for trinkets really when you do the math.
 
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BrC1H_qGPTw?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Skeena River Estuary - The Heart of the Skeena
 
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/le...on+enable+billion+project/11160269/story.html

B.C. legislature to hold rare summer session to enable $36-billion LNG project

By ROB SHAW, Vancouver Sun June 23, 2015

B.C. legislature to hold rare summer session to enable $36-billion LNG project

Premier Christy Clark's government is recalling the legislature for a rare summer session to pass key legislation enabling a liquified natural gas project.

Photograph by: Koji Sasahara , The Associated Press Files

VICTORIA — Premier Christy Clark's government is recalling the legislature for a rare summer session to pass key legislation enabling a liquefied natural gas project.

The government will reconvene the legislature on July 13, Finance Minister Mike de Jong announced Tuesday.

The intention is to pass enabling legislation that will allow the government to enter into a project development agreement with Pacific NorthWest LNG, which is proposing a $36-billion terminal and pipeline near Prince Rupert.

Pacific NorthWest LNG announced last month a "conditional" final investment decision, dependent on the B.C. legislature bill, as well as federal environmental approval and some type of agreement with local First Nations.

The entire project development agreement with Pacific NorthWest LNG will be public, said de Jong.

De Jong said he's not sure how long it will take to pass the bill, but politicians will be sitting for more than one week.

The legislation would allow the government to enter into future agreements with other LNG proponents using cabinet orders, and not require legislative approval.

NDP leader John Horgan said a summer session is a deliberate move by the Liberals to debate an important issue when the public is on a break.

"I do believe they are bringing forward a secret deal with a foreign company in July because they don't want people to pay attention to what they are doing," he said.

De Jong said he's still anticipating a fall session of the legislature as well, though it's unclear how the timing might be affected by a federal election.

rshaw@vancouversun.com

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/le...ion+project/11160269/story.html#ixzz3e6nGXElT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://bcndpcaucus.ca/news/horgan-l...-foreign-corporations-not-british-columbians/

Horgan: LNG deal looks good for foreign corporations, not British Columbians

July 6, 2015
Posted in: Build LNG 100 percent BC, Jobs and Economy, John Horgan

VICTORIA – New Democrat leader John Horgan issued the following statement in response to the release of the Project Development Agreement for the Pacific Northwest LNG project:

AGAs_LNG-terminal“New Democrats want to see an LNG industry develop in B.C., but the deal we saw revealed today looks like a good deal for Petronas and the other foreign multi-national corporations involved, not for British Columbians.

“It looks like Premier Christy Clark is prepared to sell out British Columbians in order to get a deal signed on her political timeline before the next election.

“The agreement includes pages and pages of protections for the companies involved, but locks us in to low tax and royalty rates for 25 years. In return, Premier Clark required zero job or training guarantees, or even local sourcing of products and services during construction to help grow our economy.

“British Columbians value our resources and our environment. They expect government to protect the environment, negotiate a fair return for our resources and for future generations, and fight for jobs for British Columbians. They also expect to see First Nations included as partners. At first glance, it doesn’t seem this deal achieves any of that.

“New Democrats will be examining the deal closely and fighting to ensure British Columbians aren’t left behind by Premier Clark.”
 
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/alberta-oil-and-gas-millions-fuel-bc-liberal-machine

Alberta oil and gas millions fuel BC Liberal machine

As Premier Christy Clark recalls the B.C. legislature to expedite a controversial LNG project, a Vancouver Observer special investigation reveals that the BC Liberal Party has received millions from Alberta-based oil and gas companies over the last 10 years, significantly more than the industry’s donations to the Alberta PCs.
 
Criminals. This is just what I am saying on why we are never going to have people in office that represent us.
I agree SV - if we let party politics trump democracy and open and honest dialogue. That's why this Harper regime has to go. The BC so-called "Liberals" are just another Harper-esk wanna-be.
 
Back
Top