Jonathan Wilkinson, let’s protect Fraser Chinook.

OldBlackDog

Well-Known Member
Jonathan Wilkinson: Together, let’s protect Fraser chinook salmon
Jonathan Wilkinson
Updated: May 12, 2019

salmon-fishing-closed.jpg

Chinook salmon fisheries will be severely curtailed in 2019. Jamie Lusch / AP

British Columbians are rightly concerned about the state of several wild Pacific salmon stocks. I share that concern.

As minister of fisheries and oceans and MP for North Vancouver, I know that salmon are more than just food. They are intrinsically linked to our cultural identity, they are fundamental to Indigenous communities, and they are a significant indicator of overall environmental health.

Salmon are keystone species keeping ecosystems in balance, providing food for wildlife and people and, at the end of their lives, supplying nutrients to forests. They are of great importance for B.C.’s recreational and commercial fisheries and for tourism.

Over the past 50 years, biodiversity around the world and here in Canada have been in steep decline. Globally, wildlife populations have declined by 60 per cent. Fraser Chinook have experienced similar dramatic declines in recent years. Twelve of the Fraser River’s 13 Chinook salmon populations are at risk.

The federal government and partners are taking action in several areas to address these declines:

Habitat protection: We are bringing in a new Fisheries Act to restore protections for fish habitat that were lost under the Harper government and working closely with the B.C. government on land and water-use policies that can impact critical habitat.

Habitat restoration: In partnership with B.C., we have established a $142-million Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund to enable salmon-habitat restoration projects in B.C. communities.

Improved stock assessment: Our government has committed an additional $107 million to improve fish stock assessments and contribute to a better managed fishery.

Predator concerns: In partnership with the University of B.C., we are convening a symposium of stakeholders to bring forward relevant science and thoughts regarding the potential impacts of seals and sea lion populations.

Thoughtful fisheries management is also a vital component of the overall equation. Habitat restoration is critical for longer-term stock-rebuilding efforts. But in the shorter term, we must ensure that a sufficient number of Fraser River Chinook are getting to their spawning grounds if we wish to preserve these populations from extinction.

That’s why, I announced strict fisheries management measures crafted to protect and preserve these endangered stocks. The measures provide for a catch-and-release recreational fishery until the Fraser River stocks have left the relevant area. For most areas, this will occur by July 15 or Aug. 1, after which a retention limit of one Chinook per person will apply. Similar restrictions will be in place for First Nations food and ceremonial fisheries and for relevant commercial fisheries.

This was a difficult set of decisions taken only after extensive consultations and a thorough review of the scientific evidence. The restrictions were mindful of what we had heard from recreational and commercial fisheries stakeholders.

At the end of the day, ignoring the science and willfully driving these salmon populations to extinction would cause irreversible long-term damage to industry — not to mention the implications for biodiversity.

While I understand and sympathize with concerns that have been expressed by recreational harvesters, I would not be appropriately doing the job that Canadians expect of their minister of fisheries and oceans if I were to knowingly allow Fraser River Chinook populations to be put on a path to extinction.

Moving forward, much needs to be done to manage Fraser River Chinook salmon in a way that conserves and rebuilds these populations — protecting and enhancing biodiversity while concurrently enabling sustainable fishing opportunities for First Nations, commercial and recreational harvesters. This will be a challenge and I acknowledge there will be controversy. But it is a path we must follow if we are to ensure the sustainability of these populations for the future.

Jonathan Wilkinson is the federal minister of fisheries, oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard.

Letters to the editor should be sent to sunletters@vancouversun.com. The editorial pages editor is Gordon Clark, who can be reached at gclark@postmedia.com.

CLICK HERE to report a typo.
 
There's nothing in the set of measures that will address a recovery. Habitat improvement, while very worthwhile is a 2 decade solution. Anyone who has done habitat work knows that it takes immense amount of time and resources to assess opportunity, build an engineering solution, secure the Section 7 licenses to complete work, and of course complete those works in the very limited time window we actually have to work in a stream.

Both Chinook and SRKW need more immediate actions and results. Fishers and coastal communities that rely on the fishery also need immediate help. That comes from investment in emergency fish culture intervention. Not SEP production facilities, but from warehouse operations aimed at rearing stocks of concern in a central facility so we can help address the climate change issues faced in freshwater due to warming and sedimentation. We also need to address stream fertilization to improve water chemistry and grow insect life that Chinook depend upon for food while in freshwater for 1 to 2 years. The approach taken is an ENGO based lets do anything to avoid hatcheries solution. The facts are simply the fastest way to increase productivity is to invest in emergency fish culture. Best approach is to set up a central facility in Prince George using ground water in an existing warehouse so we can have that facility constructed in less than 12 months.

The fixation of the wild salmon policy with not creating interactions between wild and hatchery stocks is pure nonsense when we are facing an emergency situation of low abundance and spawner recruits....and a complicated situation where the freshwater environment has been compromised by climate change and out-migrant predation from pinnipeds.
 
Last edited:
I think someone is feeling guilty. I have never seen a federal fisheries minister write editorial to defend their position.
 
Last edited:
To set aside $142 CAD for habitat restoration in one of the largest watersheds on the continent tells you everything about their honest intentions. I read a report recently where a smaller river in the PNW was rehabed for about US$160 and our minister really brags about CAD$142 for the Fraser? Until I see $5B on the table I know it is just smoke and mirrors.
 
What a bunch of Political Double Speak! $142-million Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund is over 5 years and the Feds are only kicking in $100-million, so that works out to $20-million a year. Obviously this will fool all the average folk into believing this is a true path to recovery of the early Fraser Chinook stocks. The usual DFO ******** of putting the money out there and then up to organizations to apply for the funds. It's not even specifically targeted to the Fraser!

Stock assessment is severely lacking at DFO, but when you're counting the fish and not enhancing them as Searun points out, what's the point when you're down to such low numbers!

Oh great another study! No action on pinniped control.

Thanks Jonathan Wilkinson for ensuring that early Fraser Chinook definitely go extinct!
 
  • Taken from site!
  • No rebuttal from any groups.

  • 1 hour ago
In all of this, the minister fails to mention that Chinook salmon are the primary food source of the Southern Resident orcas. He states that populations have declined by 60%, with 12 of the 13 species “at risk.” At the same time, he states that “currently enabling sustainable fishing opportunities ....for recreational harvesters...” Where is the hue and cry from so-called “activists” and from the general lower mainland population on this issue? Admittedly, the endangerment of the orcas has nothing to do with proposals for 1 double-hulled oil tanker per day (which hasn’t even happened yet), but has more to do with the slow killing off of the orcas’ primary food source by gross mismanagement of the resource. If Lower Mainlanders were REALLY concerned about the Orcas, they would be calling for an immediate ban on “recreational harvesters”, at the very least. « less
 
Don’t jet fooled into the freshwater habitat game.

Ocean survival is still the reason for declines and this stock was sent into a death spiral with nets across the river.

Some creeks in the upper Fraser had only a couple spawners. Those places will need supplemental hatchery stock if they ever hope to rebuild. DFO even recognizes this but no plans to make it happen.

Yes as ukee dreaming has pointed out there is a lot of issues with freshwater habitat.

Tho the fresh water habitat that is there that’s good needs fish first.

IMO this is where the pacific salmon foundation should step in and come up with a comprehensive rebuild plan.

I believe if the PSF did a plan that DFO would have a hard time ignoring it.
 
Don’t jet fooled into the freshwater habitat game.

Ocean survival is still the reason for declines and this stock was sent into a death spiral with nets across the river.

Some creeks in the upper Fraser had only a couple spawners. Those places will need supplemental hatchery stock if they ever hope to rebuild. DFO even recognizes this but no plans to make it happen.

Yes as ukee dreaming has pointed out there is a lot of issues with freshwater habitat.

Tho the fresh water habitat that is there that’s good needs fish first.

IMO this is where the pacific salmon foundation should step in and come up with a comprehensive rebuild plan.

I believe if the PSF did a plan that DFO would have a hard time ignoring it.
Under Minister Wilkinson's recovery plan there is no mention of emergency fish culture. That would actually lead to some fish getting back to this spawning grounds, so of course it would make too much sense!
 
Under Minister Wilkinson's recovery plan there is no mention of emergency fish culture. That would actually lead to some fish getting back to this spawning grounds, so of course it would make too much sense!

That’s why we need the PSF to come up with a plan, given the money they get from salmon stamps and this stock is currently shutting down the whole coast it should be a priority IMO.
 
Under Minister Wilkinson's recovery plan there is no mention of emergency fish culture. That would actually lead to some fish getting back to this spawning grounds, so of course it would make too much sense!
100% agree with you. Wilkinson's plan is to close rec fisheries (saves 5%), spend $142 million over 5 years, of which much of the capital will not go directly into fish production (hatchery or habitat). Not one single dollar of the BCSHRIF money went to fish culture.

So our big solution here is to rely on creating more Chinook on already depressed recruitment of adults by simply reducing harvest so we get an additional 5% of the adult run back to spawn in rivers already impacted by climate change...and the only thing we are going to do about it is a smattering of habitat work. We all know that to plan and deliver habitat improvement projects you conservatively need 1 to 5 years to plan and implement, and a further 5 to 10 years before you start realizing any real productivity. And your increased productivity is further hampered by a lack of adult spawners to begin with. Its a circle jerk solution.

We will be waiting 20 to 30 years before this plan shows any measurable benefit unless there is some gift from God, and we get improved ocean conditions, lower predation, and colder freshwater. Good luck recreational fishery...you are doomed to the next 20 years to no fishing, and no economic benefit.

We need a balanced recovery plan that has a mix of emergency hatchery programs to boost recruitment, while we work hard to ramp up habitat improvement and deal with predation...both of which are long-term (20+ year) programs.
 
Back
Top