Implementing New Management Measures for the Recreational Harvest of Shrimps and Prawns Combined in

Derby

Crew Member
Implementing New Management Measures for the Recreational Harvest of Shrimps and Prawns Combined in BC Tidal Waters

Issue

The recreational daily limit for all Shrimps, including Prawn has not changed since 1996. A series of precautionary measures have been implemented by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) in the prawn and shrimp by trap fishery for all sectors in support of conservation and sustainable management. The effort in harvesting Prawns by the recreational sector has increased significantly over the last 20 years.

To support the overall sustainability of the prawn fishery, DFO is implementing a reduced daily limit and possession limit for all Shrimp species, including Prawn, which will be in effect April 1, 2020.

Background

DFO recognizes the importance of the fishery resource to all who depend on it for their sustenance, livelihood and recreation. The Department’s role is to manage the fishery resource with a cautious approach to ensure the sustainability of Canada’s fisheries into the future.

The Department regularly reviews the management measures it has in place for fisheries to ensure they are relevant to current conditions and objectives. In recent years, DFO Fisheries Management has been making adjustments to how the prawn fishery is managed under a conservation framework guided by the Prawn and Shrimp by trap Integrated Fisheries Management Plan for all sectors in support of conservation and sustainable management. While interest and participation in recreational fishing has increased significantly in recent years, numerous features of the recreational management regime for recreational prawn fisheries have not changed in decades. The new recreational limits for these fisheries are intended to respond to changes in fishing effort as part of the precautionary approach DFO takes to ensure sustainability of the fishery.

Over the last several decades, Prawn harvest has become an increasingly valuable and important part of BC’s fisheries, placing increased pressure on the resource. The commercial Prawn harvest is one of the most valuable fisheries in BC and First Nations are harvesting Prawn in increasing numbers for Food-Social-Ceremonial (FSC) purposes, often using commercial gear. The recreational harvest of Prawns has grown, with increasing effort, increasing interest and advances in fishing gear and equipment (e.g. fish finders, chart plotters, power trap haulers). The daily limit has been in place since 1996 and has been viewed as unreasonably high, as it was an arbitrary number when adopted. Concerns about the recreational daily limit have been raised by First Nations, commercial harvesters and DFO through annual consultations. This has made efforts to manage First Nations harvest of prawn for FSC purposes challenging.

Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Canada Canada
Page 2 of 5

In recent years, DFO Fisheries Management has been making justments to how the Prawn fishery is managed, for all sectors, to respond to changes in prawn fisheries. All sectors involved in fishing (First Nations Food-Social-Ceremonial (FSC), Recreational, Commercial) share a responsibility to manage fisheries resources. This includes adopting sustainable fishing practices and the implementation of new management measures. Some recent examples of new management measures in the Prawn fishery include: - The requirement, starting in 2014, for all commercial Prawn vessels to have a DFO-approved Vessel Monitoring System and a system to notify DFO and the service provider every time gear is set or hauled. - The requirement, starting in 2014, for all commercial Prawn vessels to release any egg bearing female Prawn, immediately, with the least harm possible. - The requirement, starting in 2016, for a supplemental licence when using commercial gear and vessels to fish for Prawns for FSC purposes. - The requirement, starting in 2017, for all commercial Prawn vessels to remove their fishing gear within 3 days of notification of the closure of the fishery (from 7 days), reducing commercial fishing effort by 4 days in a 35-40 day fishery. - The requirement, starting in 2018, for all recreational harvesters to release any egg bearing female Prawn, immediately, with the least harm possible. - (Complete list in Appendix 1)

DFO recognizes the efforts of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board (SFAB) to support some of the existing management measures such as the release of all Prawns carrying eggs by the recreational fishing sector and seasonal area closures in key South Coast areas. The Department has consulted with the SFAB on the issue of daily limits for the past four years and more extensively in the past year to develop proposals. The SFAB recommended a smaller reduction to 170 per day in South Coast waters and no change in North Coast waters and has suggested that a reduction in the daily limit amounts to a reallocation to other sectors. While the daily limit does not restrict the total catch of the whole fishery, it can help in limiting effort in recreational fisheries that consist of numerous and often dispersed operations that might otherwise be difficult to limit. The reduction in the daily limit for recreationally caught prawn is considered a longer-term sustainable management measure that can be applied coast wide.

Management Changes

Starting April 1, 2020, the daily recreational limit for all Shrimps, including Prawn, will be reduced to 125 (aggregate limit). This applies coast wide.

The combined possession limit for all Shrimps including Prawn, will remain at 2 times the daily limit, which is 250 (aggregate limit).
Page 3 of 5

Appendix 1: History of BC Prawn Fishery Management

Prawn and Shrimp Trap Fishery History of Commercial Management
 
Is this factual

“The Department has consulted with the SFAB on the issue of daily limits for the past four years”
 
Over the last several decades, Prawn harvest has become an increasingly valuable and important part of BC’s fisheries, placing increased pressure on the resource. The commercial Prawn harvest is one of the most valuable fisheries in BC and First Nations are harvesting Prawn in increasing numbers for Food-Social-Ceremonial (FSC) purposes, often using commercial gear. The recreational harvest of Prawns has grown, with increasing effort, increasing interest and advances in fishing gear and equipment (e.g. fish finders, chart plotters, power trap haulers). The daily limit has been in place since 1996 and has been viewed as unreasonably high, as it was an arbitrary number when adopted. Concerns about the recreational daily limit have been raised by First Nations, commercial harvesters and DFO through annual consultations. This has made efforts to manage First Nations harvest of prawn for FSC purposes challenging.
 
I guess they forgot to mention an equal percentage cut to commercial fishers? Surely the so called “sustainable fishery” is no longer sustainable and cuts by all user groups should be the same if DFO wishes to continue to portray itself as the unbiased arbitrator. Or perhaps they are showing their marching orders are to protect industry over average Canadians. I can accept a 37.5% reduction in my catch if other users do as well!
 
This is really the equivalent of DFO saying your halibut Quota was 15% now its 10%. It's no different, Commercial and First Nations pointed the finger at us asked for us to take a cut and DFO obliged.

Are these restrictions still necessary then?

DFO recognizes the efforts of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board (SFAB) to support some of the existing management measures such as the release of all Prawns carrying eggs by the recreational fishing sector and seasonal area closures in key South Coast areas.
 
Another man yells at cloud saga.

upload_2020-1-10_20-4-3.png




Prawns got re-allocated to First Nations. That is what happened. The SFAB tried all they could with DFO originally is was 100. It is not science based or data based. It a straight up re-allocation of our share to another sector as part of reconciliation. We all know this was coming with the government was re-elected. The government has clear mandate to settle with all First Nation groups as part of UN declaration.

We as a group will start to feel this as time goes on. We need to start establishing partnerships with FN more than ever if we are going to continue to have access. Feel bad for my kids honestly I don't like with this government is doing. It really isn't FN fault. These treaties should have been dealt with years ago.
 
Last edited:
We need to start timetabling partnerships with FN more than ever if we are going to continue to have access.

I think the Haida have signaled loud and clear they really don't need recreational fishing partnerships

pay to play will be the model, DFO might as well double the licence fees now and give them half the profits.
 
Another man yells at cloud saga.

View attachment 49952




Prawns got re-allocated to First Nations. That is what happened. The SFAB tried all they could with DFO originally is was 100. It is not science based or data based. It a straight up re-allocation of our share to another sector as part of reconciliation. We all know this was coming with the government was re-elected. The government has clear mandate to settle with all First Nation groups as part of UN declaration.

We as a group will start to feel this as time goes on. We need to start establishing partnerships with FN more than ever if we are going to continue to have access. Feel bad for my kids honestly I don't like with this government is doing. It really isn't FN fault. These treaties should have been dealt with years ago.
My concern with this government is they are far too biased in their approach. If a cut is required it should be relatively the same for all. I understand the reallocation part, but once again it should have come from both the recreational and commercial sources and been the same percentage. Once again though rather than implementing fair and equitable cuts, the government chose to attack the weakest sector, which unfortunately is us. I can’t help but think we’re getting played.

The BS about commercials having to remove gear 3 days after closure instead of a week is meaningless. They should have to remove it within 24 hrs of a closure and DFO should be able to predict the closing date better to ensure this can happen. What 4 days did the Commercials give up, the 4 days after the closure? Maybe we should offer to only fish 4 days after our closure as well and call it square.

For years the industry has played up the fact they are a sustainable fishery and now suddenly the aren’t. Time to educate the consumers on the false advertising the industry is using.
 
Did First Nations really drop gear to 175 to 350 ft and regularly harvest enough prawns to support their people??
Come on, it’s laughable logic at a minimum. But a bad trade is a good one if you are on the right side of the deal.

I would like to see the math, Commercial, FN, and Rec., harvest numbers.
 
Did First Nations really drop gear to 175 to 350 ft and regularly harvest enough prawns to support their people??
Come on, it’s laughable logic at a minimum. But a bad trade is a good one if you are on the right side of the deal.

I would like to see the math, Commercial, FN, and Rec., harvest numbers.
Me too. The commercial season is down to less than a month long. With the MAPP process about to displace the central coast prawn fleet this is about to get really interesting. The bands around the island now have a year long fishery going on. What isn’t sold fresh is frozen and gets added into the commercial fishery when it opens.
 
So if 200 was an arbitrary, where’s the science to support 125? Why not 150 or 175? Next year will the arbitrary number of 125 be dismissed for another DFO magic number.
 
Its not based on science its a reallocation, There is no science available. Its the currency of reconciliation

Yep. Had government worked in good faith generation ago we would not be in this mess. Now next generation pays the price.

The government is the one that is at fault on it's own.
 
Last edited:
Yep. Had government worked in good faith generation ago we would not be in this mess. Now next generation pays the price.

The government is the one that is at fault on it's own.
Not working in good faith with Average Canadian recreational fishers seems to be the rule rather than the exception. Amazing when two user groups can get together and pressure an incompetent Ministry to bone the third group. I guess though if DFO, as usual, has no answers ( none floated by on the Rideau Canal) they just go with the flow. Path of least resistance. The management of this organization needs to be fired.
 
Back
Top