B.C. promises stronger rules for fish farm processing

Whole in the Water

Well-Known Member
Pretty damn poor performance of the fish farm industry. No wonder why an ever increasing number of the public are against these net pen farms. Gotta move these things on to the land where their negative impacts can be better managed

VANCOUVER—The B.C. government is promising stronger regulations for fish processing plants following an audit of 30 facilities that revealed more than 70 per cent of them had broken rules meant to protect the environment.

While the Ministry of Environment said in a release Wednesday that most infractions were administrative issues such as failing to post proper signage, some were far more serious.

tavishcampbell_ca_6.jpg

A video filmed by B.C. photographer Tavish Campbell shows clouds of red liquid, believed to be bloodwater from a fish farm, billowing out of a pipe in Brown’s Bay, off the coast of Vancouver Island about 24 kilometres northwest of Campbell River, B.C. (Contributed/Tavish Campbell)

The audit, which investigated facilities that process both farmed and wild salmon, found some fish facilities have released either too much wastewater or wastewater that was too heavily contaminated into the environment, the report notes.

Marine Harvest’s processing plant, for instance, released more wastewater than its permit allowed 75 times between June 2017 and January 2018, the investigation found.

Also concerning, was that most of the permits don’t limit the volume of wastewater that can be released or how polluted it is. These are “foundational environmental protection provisions,” according to the report.

To Stan Proboszcz, Watershed Watch’s science and campaign adviser, the findings aren’t surprising.

“When an industry doesn’t face any sorts of penalties, why would they be in a high level of compliance?” he said.

“When we’re looking at the volume and the toxicity of some of this discharge, I think that’s a concern because it’s on such a massive scale,” he said.

Even the lack of proper signage can be an issue if wastewater outfalls aren’t properly marked, Proboszcz said. “That’s kind of a concern for anyone who uses our oceans whether it’s for swimming or snorkeling or fishing,” he said.

Chris Sporer, the executive director of the Seafood Producers Association of British Columbia, said it’s important to keep the results of the audit in perspective. There are over 200 fish processing plants operating in B.C. and only 30 require these permits because most of the others are connected to municipal wastewater systems, he said.

Shawn Hall, a spokesperson for the B.C. Salmon Farmers Association, said “the current wastewater treatment permitting structure is outdated and we’re happy that the government is setting a course to address that.”

Marine Harvest, he added, has made process changes and is making investments to make sure its meeting the requirements of its permit.

Article Continued Below
The government’s audit followed the release of a shocking video captured by videographer Tavish Campbell which showed a farmed salmon processing facility releasing bloody effluent in the water.

The ministry report recommends that existing fish processing facility permits be amended so that they set limits on effluent toxicity to prevent “serious harm to fish,” that the discharge is monitored for quality and toxicity, and that the impacts to the receiving environment are monitored.

In its release, the government said Ministry of Environment staff are working to implement recommendations.

Sporer said it’s a concern if the government doesn’t engage the industry, and so far, it hasn’t.

“The operations in B.C.’s coastal communities are the ones that could be most impacted so that could affect jobs and incomes, it could affect families,” he said.

Proboszcz though, is concerned the recommendations don’t go far enough. There still aren’t any penalties for infractions and that’s the only thing that will force change, he said.

Ainslie Cruickshank is a Vancouver-based reporter covering the environment. Follow her on Twitter: @ainscruickshank
 
With the BC ministry environment? That is a laugh. Sure first fire everyone at top and work your way down. If you don't do that then its won't change. Shawnigan lake community learned that the hard way. Governments change but the people within the Ministry of Environment do not. The old guard there need to go if we are going to have real change for all industrial sites, and that includes fish farms.

You watch the senior peopl with the MOE are going to push back against any changes to the professional reliance model in BC. Guarantee it.
 
...Governments change but the people within the Ministry of Environment do not. The old guard there need to go if we are going to have real change for all industrial sites, and that includes fish farms...
X2 SV! Same 4 DFO - esp. the aquaculture branch...
 
X2 SV! Same 4 DFO - esp. the aquaculture branch...

Big changes are happening in DFO, All thoes old baby boomers that were pro fishing/racist towards first nations are retiring and being replaced by hippy social just warrior/environmentalists being pumped out of uvic.

I suspect it won't be too long till most of the old guard in all the branches are replaced. I think overall as the millennials replace them it will be very good for the environment. However people expecting to harvest more or for the cull of cute eyed mammals it's going to be a big change for them.

BC record or the environment over the last 20 years is not the greatest. Cristy and Harper did irreparable damage. Developments now sit where once small coho bearing streams once were.

I suspect to combat a going population while promoting a more green agenda. Things like Tilapia greenhouse hydroponic farms on land where fresh vegetables are integrated will be more popular.

Fishing in the ocean for wild stocks is proven to be unstable world wide. In Canada first nations have supreme court and constitutional rights to harvest first. They are the fastest growing population base. I think it's pretty safe to assume that non native commercial fishing and recreational fishing access will continue to decline per person (IE smaller limits per boat/person) even if the overall abundance increase.

People need to realize that part of being a pro environmental government tho means that cutting fishing and hunting is just part of it, That is how the general public views it. What's the point of doing all this environmental enhancement to streams/run off/fish ways/eal grass and then catching the fish before they make it to spawning grounds. Why enhance a chum population when your gonna kill all the grizzly bears and black bears that rely on thoes fish,

For me and my children I hope we are able to retain catch and release access. These total finfish closures are very concerning to me. catch and release access for flounder, dog fish ect... should not be restricted.

As for this topic crusty and harper put pro business/economy people in to these positions. Similar to what trump is doing down south to try to and make their economy super competitive. It's going to take time for thoes people to filter out.
 
I still want to insist they remove the fish farms. They have been outright lying about infecting and killing wild stocks for 20 years and now the Orca's are starving. No food and that will reduce reproduction and increase die off. This isn't something that requires catching infected salmon in the wild, that would be almost impossible as they are easily caught by predators and the first to die. Just shut down the FF's for 5 years, manage the fishery a little better for five years and see if the virus disappears and fish stocks rebound. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to correlate declining wild stocks with the introduction of FFs or that worldwide FFs have created massive problems for wild stocks.

This thread will be derailed or astro surfed claiming climate change, oil spills, droughts over fishing, just about every possible reason except this killer virus for stock reduction, heck maybe even sound in the water, BUT this idea is something that can done immediately, LOCALLY and results could showup as soon as one year, five years just insure all stocks get a year without the virus.

Maybe the virus is killing the orca's damaging their digestive or internal organs. Never hear what they find when they do a necropsy/autopsy on a whale, odd.
 
Last edited:
So-- lets just watch and see what happens ? What happened to the "Precautionary approach " ??

The ministry report recommends that existing fish processing facility permits be amended so that they set limits on effluent toxicity to prevent “serious harm to fish,” that the discharge is monitored for quality and toxicity, and that the impacts to the receiving environment are monitored.
 
So-- lets just watch and see what happens ? What happened to the "Precautionary approach " ??

The ministry report recommends that existing fish processing facility permits be amended so that they set limits on effluent toxicity to prevent “serious harm to fish,” that the discharge is monitored for quality and toxicity, and that the impacts to the receiving environment are monitored.
The technology exsists to discharge properly it costs money though so unless they are regulated to treat properly the companies choose not to treat at all. Open the drain and let her go.
 
Back
Top