I have to say, one meeting constitutes nothing as far as knowledge, understanding or pull toward an amicable end result. It takes time, like in any process to catch the grasp of how the process works and how important it is to become part of it. Here's the thing, if you don't understand or have the knowledge necessary and are not working within the process...then how the hell can you accomplish one single objective, let alone constitute any power for change? Tell me(?). Stop F-ing around by pointing fingers every single opportunity you get with a tiny notice of opportunity for this sector and that sector...get a grasp of the damaging impact of the fastest growing of all three sectors in BC. Oh, wait...but you can't. The only data we get right now is canvased at random from DFO via online questionnaire and an unsubstantiated guess at the dock, which in turn is funneled through a formula at a trusty DFO members desk. If, ten years ago when I started asking about making condition of license mandatory to submit the previous years license for tabulation. We then would have fairly accurate data per area for angler effort. Then there is something substantial to run on. You would totally understand why, what, where, when, how...and understand how-come the fastest growing sector is starting to become the most access reduction targeted among all three main fish harvesters. I am telling you now, to stop whining about what you don't have and start worrying about the opportunities you do have and how to better manage them through amicable working relationships. This is not new. I put it out there over ten years ago and everyone keeps acting like they just discovered the issue. Get over it and move forward. I tried to help then...I can only say things so many times before I, myself start to think that I am mentally diminished.
My apologies for the rant, but after what seems like more than ten years of warning...I am really getting tired.