July 31.... slot limit review?

Wi
Good luck Brutus, we are at the cancer clinic for the rest of the week so i hope to be out on Monday, give me a shout on 06 if you are there. There will be no more fishing reports from me on the renfrew site, i'm done
will do, hope it goes well at the clinic, and dont let a few bully stop from posting lol
 
Well there ya go, now we know.

Got the email a few minutes ago.
 
Well there ya go, now we know.

Got the email a few minutes ago.

Category(s):
RECREATIONAL - General Information,
RECREATIONAL - Salmon

Fishery Notice - Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Subject: FN0731-RECREATIONAL - Salmon - South Coast Chinook Management Measures - August 1, 2019 - Reminder

This Fishery Notice is a reminder of recreational management actions for
Chinook salmon that will come in effect at 00:01 hours on August 1, 2019 in
South Coast marine waters.

West Coast Vancouver Island (WCVI) – Areas 21 to 27, and offshore Areas 121,
123 to 127:

- 00:01 hours August 1 to 23:59 hours December 31, 2019, 2 Chinook per day
- Please refer to FN0657 and FN0652 for further measures on fin-fish closures
and chinook non-retention areas in WCVI waters.

Queen Charlotte and Johnstone Straits (Subareas 12-1 to 12-13, 12-15 to 12-48):

- 00:01 hours August 1 to 23:59 hours August 29, 2019, 1 Chinook per day;
- 00:01 hours August 30 to 23:59 hours December 31, 2 Chinook per day.

Strait of Georgia – North - Areas 13 to 17, Area 28 and Subareas 29-1 and 29-2:

- 00:01 hours August 1 to 23:59 hours August 29, 2019, 1 Chinook per day;
- 00:01 hours August 30 to 23:59 hours December 31, 2 Chinook per day.

Please note that the annual fin-fish closure near Cape Mudge on Quadra Island
and the Chinook non-retention closures near Harwood, Denman, and Hornby Islands
are no longer in effect.

Strait of Georgia – South and Juan de Fuca - Areas 18, 19 and portions of
Subareas 20-1 and 20-2 (excluding those waters north of a line from Owen Point
to the Port San Juan Light/Whistle Buoy, then to Woods Nose), 20-5, 29-3 to 29-
5 and 29-8:

- 00:01 hours August 1 to 23:59 hours August 29, 2019, 1 Chinook per day;
- 00:01 hours August 30 to 23:59 hours December 31, 2019, 2 Chinook per day.
- As per Fishery Notices 0507 and 0696, management measures for Southern
Resident Killer Whales are in place in portions of Areas 18, 20, and 121. These
measures include no salmon fishing in Subareas 20-3, 20-4, 18-9, and portions
of Subareas 18-2, 18-4, and 18-5 and sanctuary closures (vessel prohibition
zones) in portions of Subareas 18-4, 121-1, 121-2. Please refer to FN0507 and
FN0696 for full details.
- Subareas 20-6 and 20-7 are Chinook non-retention August 1, 2019 to October
15, 2019.

Fraser River mouth, tidal and non-tidal waters – Subareas 29-6, 29-7, 29-9 to
29-17 and those waters of the Fraser River upstream from the Highway Bridge at
Mission, BC to the Alexandria Bridge:

- Jan. 1 to Aug. 23, No fishing for salmon.
- Aug. 23 to Dec. 31, Chinook non-retention.

After August 23, dependent on in-season information fisheries may be announced
targeting other species. These will also be subject to any measures required
for other stocks of concern such as Interior Fraser Coho or Steelhead salmon.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastwide Recreational Fisheries:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the recreational fishery, the annual aggregate limit for Chinook salmon is
ten (10) coastwide in all tidal waters.

Further information on specific management actions will be communicated by
separate Fishery Notices. You can view or subscribe to fisheries notices at:
http://notices.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fns-sap/index-eng.cfm


FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Contact your local DFO office
http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/contact/regions/pacific-pacifique-eng.html


Fisheries and Oceans Canada Operations Center - FN0731
Sent July 31, 2019 at 16:25
Visit us on the Web at http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

If you would like to unsubscribe, please submit your request at: http://www-ops2.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fns-sap/index-eng.cfm?pg=manage_subscription

If you have any questions, please contact us via e-mail to: DFO.OpsCentreFisheryPacific-CentreOpsPechePacifique.MPO@canada.ca
 
OK now im finally going to say something re whoever foggedin is ... YOU created a **** storm with your lies stating got it from the horses mouth etc . why would you post the crap you did in the renfrew reports. I dont know why you would say **** like that I really dont get it.
A lot of people read and lurk on here and I even had a guy call from alberta saying he wasnt coming as he "saw" on a thread fishing is closed off of sooke so please next time shut it unless you TRUE facts we dont need a more lies and rumors spread let wilkenson and dumb dumd do that ok please and thanks

now go fishing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Lol eas
OK now im finally going to say something re whoever foggedin is ... YOU created a **** storm with your lies stating got it from the horses mouth etc . why would you post the crap you did in the renfrew reports. I dont know why you would say **** like that I really dont get it.
A lot of people read and lurk on here and I even had a guy call from alberta saying he wasnt coming as he "saw" on a thread fishing is closed off of sooke so please next time shut it unless you TRUE facts we dont need a more lies and rumors spread let wilkenson and dumb dumd do that ok please and thanks

now go fishing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lol easy now, that is why i did not listen to the gussip, not posted on the dfo web site, so it was just gossip, no its posted and we good to go, happy fishing boys, we can only get 10 so enjoy
 
Am I missing something as it doesn’t state anything about the size restriction for WCVI, is it in or out.
 
Am I missing something as it doesn’t state anything about the size restriction for WCVI, is it in or out.

It says WCVI areas 21 to 27 and offshore areas 121,123 to 127 August 1 to December 31 - 2 chinook per day.....since thats all it says I would assume the slot limit is lifted. It should say otherwise if it isn't...I think.
 
I would assume the same thing but I hate assuming, I like to know absolutely positively.
 
Just print out the latest DFO website info and keep it in the boat. That’s all you can do.... I had to throw one over the limit back today, but as of tomorrow they stay...
 
I would assume the same thing but I hate assuming, I like to know absolutely positively.

I went to the website and you know where you can download the area maps ? I looked at the one for Barkley Sound and it says at the bottom for the light blue area (area 123) July 15 - July 31 2 chinook per day(max 80cm) then underneath it says Aug 1 to Dec 31 2 chinook per day. There are no Fisheries Notices saying thats changed, so I think we're good....unless that changes by midnight.

btw, also as of Aug. 1st allowed 4 coho on the inside, of which 2 can be wild....but I think that's same as last year.
 
Last edited:
There is a mistake in the fisheries notice. Areas 20-1 and 20-2 were included as part of the JdF regs. They are actually part of the WCVI regs and should be at 2 per day over 45 cm.

This is confirmed by DFO. A revised notice will be sent out tomorrow.

CP
 
Have to apologize for that rant its been a VERY stressful time for alot of people in sooke many have folded businesses, tourism is way down .
been weighing on us badly. hard to make a years living in one month and to wait till today at 430ish is complete BS , Sorry Bud
 
Wow I thought we would get a bit of a break out Sidney way, but between Chinook non retention, whale Sanctuaries and no fin fish areas, there is very little left. Seems we are heading for complete closure unless something changes. Can’t help but feel our having a Green MP has cost us dearly and I plan to once again point out to her that the area she claims to represent is continually getting screwed!
 
Have to apologize for that rant its been a VERY stressful time for alot of people in sooke many have folded businesses, tourism is way down .
been weighing on us badly. hard to make a years living in one month and to wait till today at 430ish is complete BS , Sorry Bud
Lol, tempers are flaring all over, all good wolf, all the best for the rest of the season
 
you hit the nail on the head Ziggy!
DFO fields more complaints from the gulf islands than anywhere else in bc. A bunch of largely uninformed champagne socialists who don't care or understand the shitstorm they create effects actual people. unfortunately the area got what they deserve. Blame your neighbors not dfo or "the government".

beemer

Who lives in gulf islands near all those closures? Do some research and may find a few who lobbied for fishing closures and sanctuaries there. These arent just anyone major players in the decision making process. Not implying anything just stating a fact.
 
Who lives in gulf islands near all those closures? Do some research and may find a few who lobbied for fishing closures and sanctuaries there. These arent just anyone major players in the decision making process. Not implying anything just stating a fact.
How about sharing this information with the rest of us? Who are these people and organizations?This has had a tremendous impact on the whole Saanich Peninsula as well as the Gulf Islands, so if you have any actual info, it would help those of us who haven’t yet thrown in the towel and decided to move on. If nothing else the facts would go a long way into quelling the rumour we were thrown under the bus.
 
you hit the nail on the head Ziggy!
DFO fields more complaints from the gulf islands than anywhere else in bc. A bunch of largely uninformed champagne socialists who don't care or understand the shitstorm they create effects actual people. unfortunately the area got what they deserve. Blame your neighbors not dfo or "the government".

beemer
That would play well in the alternate world of DFO decision making where politics trumps science and neighbours are turned against neighbours, be it in actual neighbourhoods or in DFO Regulatory Areas. I can only speak from personal experience, where I live we had lots of fishers who aren’t champagne socialists and a simple look at the Tulista boat ramp traffic and membership in Sidney anglers seems to support that view.

I may be naive but frankly I think government, if it is in fact facing groundless complaints it needs to do its job and make the right decision as opposed to the easy decision. Well it may be true DFO fields complaints from champagne socialists I have to question if they get more complaints from the Gulf Islands than anywhere else, or is that conjecture ? It would be interesting to see where one could access this info.

I think the ENGO’s are active in all areas and their mission is to pick off one area at a time. Maybe we are their focus currently! Question is who’s next?
 
I really don’t see the point in the Fishing BC App, it’s not updated yet almost 24 hrs later.
 
Who lives in gulf islands near all those closures? Do some research and may find a few who lobbied for fishing closures and sanctuaries there. These arent just anyone major players in the decision making process. Not implying anything just stating a fact.

Let me guarantee you it's NOT people who own boats in the gulf islands who believe in balanced science-based measures. You have a few folks who believe anything Raincoast or similar puts out and doesn't question it.
 
Back
Top