Plan to divert Maple Creek worries Port Coquitlam environmentalists

ya, that's a bizarre one. Considering what hoops streamkeepers have to go through in order to do volunteer their time to do good things for creeks and rivers I am very surprised to hear that DFO has approved this. Makes a guy think their is some funny business going on here.

http://www.tricitynews.com/news/moving-creek-has-port-coquitlam-streamkeepers-worried-1.2319407

A group of Port Coquitlam streamkeepers are raising the alarm about a plan to move a large portion of a Maple Creek tributary to make way for a massive house.

Maple Creek Streamkeepers say the plan to move 55 m of a Maple Creek side channel 5 m northwest of its existing path will undo 20 years of hard work in improving habitat and enhancing coho salmon and cutthroat trout in the area.

"When you move a stream you never get back the productivity of the stream," said Sandy Budd, the group's president, who fears the approval of a watercourse development permit to move the creek running behind an existing house at 2545 Kitchener Ave. will unleash a flood of similar requests.

The proposal by property owner Yang de Yang, a retired businessman from China, has received approval by Fisheries and Oceans Canada after consultation with the Kwikwetlem First Nation. And Yang's daughter, who plans to live in the proposed 10,000-sq. ft. house with her extended family, said work will be done to save fish and improve habitat as part of the creek relocation.

"My father… he wants to build a kind of dream home for us," Amelia Yang told The Tri-City News. "That's why we would like to take time and spend money to relocate the creek.
"We have put a lot of effort [into it]," she said. "We hired professionals to see how we can minimize the effect on the environment."

But the proposal for such a large home on the narrow, tree-lined street has neighbours riled and the streamkeepers concerned.

- See more at: http://www.tricitynews.com/news/mov...rried-1.2319407#sthash.SnWYPGP5.bFeAJvO8.dpuf
 
The stream isn't protected as with most in BC, and DFO actually have zero authority unless its proven fish are directly harmed. I encourage everyone to look at rewritten navigational water acts of Canada. Wrong fight it is with the BC environment minister, and Christy Clark. Development must get approval first. DFO is just formality. Good luck on that. Your going to see way more of this happen in years to come, and especially with this liberal government.
 
Back
Top