Ministers say salmon not being restored in Fraser River

Derby

Crew Member
Ministers say salmon not being restored in Fraser River
Mark Hume
VANCOUVER — The Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, May. 21 2014, 8:26 PM EDT
Last updated Wednesday, May. 21 2014, 8:26 PM EDT
2 comments



43

33

10

0

• Print /
License
• AA
Almost none of the 75 recommendations B.C. Supreme Court Justice Bruce Cohen made on how to restore sockeye stocks in the Fraser River have been acted on by Ottawa, two federal ministers indicate.
Critics have long accused the government of failing to follow up on the $26-million Cohen Commission report in a meaningful way.
But it wasn’t until Liberal MP Lawrence MacAulay recently asked detailed questions about which recommendations were adopted that the government verified the extent of its actions.
In written replies earlier this month, Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq states most of the Cohen recommendations “are directed solely” at the department of Fisheries and Oceans and only 10 were aimed at her ministry. Of those, seven were accepted and three, dealing with marine spills and pollution monitoring responsibilities, were rejected.
Fisheries Minister Gail Shea also states in writing that DFO “has and will continue to implement Cohen recommendations as part of our day-to-day operations.” But she gives only one example of a recommendation (related to restrictions on salmon-farm expansion) that has been followed.
She does list four “new investments,” which “highlight support for Cohen recommendations,” but none of those programs, such as $54-million promised over five years for aquaculture sustainability, were requested in the Cohen report.
Mr. MacAulay, vice-chair of Parliament’s Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, said “Mr. Cohen is probably the most knowledgeable person in Canada” on B.C.’s sockeye problem, and he is perplexed by the government’s failure to follow his advice.
“It’s impossible for me to understand why a government would put a Cohen Commission together, spend that amount of money and then not adhere to anything they had to say, and not even have the man come before the fisheries committee,” said Mr. MacAulay. “It would look to me like they do not want to hear what he has to say.”
In his questions, Mr. MacAulay also asked for “all briefing documents prepared for all departmental officials” related to Mr. Cohen’s recommendations, but DFO blanked out the titles of 17 of the 19 reports it listed, indicating the documents were under cabinet confidence.
“Has conservation become a secret in this country?” asked Mr. MacAulay.
“This is very disappointing,” said Craig Orr, executive director of the Watershed Watch Salmon Society. “All of this would be laughable, if tears weren’t rolling out so much.”
Dr. Orr said the Cohen Commission provided the government with a blueprint for restoring the Fraser River’s sockeye run, but the government ignored it.
“Shea is just promoting aquaculture. She’s not protecting wild fish, which is what Cohen called for,” said Dr. Orr. “It’s just a PR thing [for her] to say DFO is consistent with the Cohen recommendations. Nobody sees that happening in the Pacific Region.”
Otto Langer, a retired DFO employee who has become an outspoken critic of the department on the West Coast, agreed with that assessment.
“Really a bafflegab response,” he stated in an e-mail. “The DFO response is much more evasive than the [Environment Canada] one and is overly generalized and is nothing but an attempt at spin doctoring.”
Mr. Langer couldn’t understand how Ms. Shea could say her department is implementing Cohen’s recommendations, when DFO has undergone staff and budget cuts since the report came out in 2012.
Alexandra Morton, an independent researcher and environmental advocate, was critical of DFO, saying Mr. Cohen called for restrictions on salmon farming along the migratory route of sockeye salmon, but that has not been done.
Environment Canada and DFO were not able to immediately to respond to questions.
In his report, Justice Cohen called for the government to adopt a policy that put wild salmon first, to do more research on diseases and to ensure that salmon farms don’t impact wild stocks.
Follow Mark Hume on Twitter: @markhumeglobe
 
All the more reason to vote Harper and his big business first cronies out of office in the election next year. This lack of action at the expense of $26 million of tax payers money is shameful! :mad:
 
Love it when they spend 26 mil on something like that, all they had to do was ask, unbelievable, -makes me sick to my stomach - Is it time to separate??
 
Love it when they spend 26 mil on something like that, all they had to do was ask, unbelievable, -makes me sick to my stomach - Is it time to separate??
I am in. Other than a really good hockey team for the Olympics every 4 years, what benefits do we get from confederation? For the past 50 years B.C. has been identified as a "Has" province, and money has flowed East. Transfer payments show that I have actually supported Ontario inthe past few years as well as Quebec and the rest of the have not provinces. I'm done. What do we in teh West REALLY get from Ottawa?
 
Separate the best country in the world?? that makes no sense and wont solve the problem.

I alway's get a kick out of the comments don't vote for Harper and his buddies. Maybe we should vote in the Liberals again so they can **** away billions on another long gun registry?? Or even better vote in the NDP so the country can be run by unions??

None of these are effective solutions and none of the political parties will do any better job to protect the salmon stocks.

if you want to help wild salmon support the Pacific Salmon Foundation, BC Wildlife Federation, Steelhead Society etc.
 
Separate the best country in the world?? that makes no sense and wont solve the problem.

I alway's get a kick out of the comments don't vote for Harper and his buddies. Maybe we should vote in the Liberals again so they can **** away billions on another long gun registry?? Or even better vote in the NDP so the country can be run by unions??

None of these are effective solutions and none of the political parties will do any better job to protect the salmon stocks.

.
Exactly. So if all the parties are the same and none of them are going to be any better at it than any other, perhaps its time to look at alternatives to the present system. Do you really believe that we would be worse off if Western Canada and the North went its separate way? Let's see, we would have all the resources, and no tax draw to Quebec, Ontario and the Maritimes.

If I am so wrong, what DO we gain from Central Canada? Its thought taht at least at least is worth a ponder.

Apologies for the thread hi-jack and I will shut up now;)
 
if you want to help wild salmon support the Pacific Salmon Foundation, BC Wildlife Federation, Steelhead Society etc.

Finaddict you left out the most important part of my post when you quoted me. If we can not agree on keeping the country together or what political party to vote for we should at least agree that organizations like these three will look out for our salmon/environment . We should all put our money or time were our mouths are and support them.
 
Finaddict you left out the most important part of my post when you quoted me. If we can not agree on keeping the country together or what political party to vote for we should at least agree that organizations like these three will look out for our salmon/environment . We should all put our money or time were our mouths are and support them.
100% agree and very good point. And I do put my money in 2 of the three and a couple others as well.
 
I agree with voting out this bunch of bullies and slimeballs in the next election. However, there is some time before that - and they have latitude to do more damage until then. AND there is the problem with the party system - for any party or ideology - that prohibits our elected representatives from truly representing us - the electorate.

So - instead of trying to fix what is wrong with our system at a base level - which would be nice if we could, but would take time or a revolution - I would recommend to everyone to keep writing letters and emails to our elected representatives - whatever riding or political parties we associate with or our representatives belong to. Keep asking tough questions to government officials and the Fishery Minister. Keep demanding to be heard. Keep the pressure on.

Use the system - broken as it is - do FoI/ATips. Submit petitions to the Auditor General. Disrupt nice photo-ops by demanding answers - if you have that ability. Write letters to the Fishery Minister through your elected representative's office. Organize. Support the worthwhile groups above. Write to reporters and give them story ideas.

Maybe take a trip to Ottawa and slap a dead fish onto the Fisheries Minister desk. Whatever you can do - do it. Don't give-up and become a couch potato - that's what the government wants - a docile, malleable electorate that never asks any tough questions,nor demands to be involved in the decision-making.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, fish stocks increased through successive Liberal governments. What was it, 69 years of the 20 th century? A huge period of growth? Oh wait lol!
 
If you think that the BC government would be much better in managing our fisheries then think again and research their involvement in this mess. Can't see how separating would make anything better.
 
Back
Top