Disconnect? How incompetent DFO really is. By Bob Hooton

That's what a selective harvest looks like. Rudimentary technology, but a selective fish trap nevertheless. All part of the FSC rights protected under our Constitution. Better than using gill nets! And, we best get over it...this is a right enshrined in your laws, not FN's.
 
This is the Cap bands traditional rights...These are hatchery fish produced for the Capilano river from the hatchery that was placed there to replace the displaced fish when they dam the river for all Vancouvers drinking water.... I remember seeing this as a young man fishing the Cap mouth for summer cohoes in the late 70's.... there seems to be some shopping carts missing;)
 



Breaking news! Pinnipeds are eating all the sturgeon too. (IFS = Interior Fraser Steelhead)


 
Good thing we have a bait ban on the Cap....lol
That video pretty much sums up the beach seining on the Fraser!
 
Get over it White buck... I have seen all this shat before you were born.. its about relationships & partnerships..like no like its what the new future is.... move along or get involved :)
 
The capilano is a hatchery river, there is almost no natural coho spawning due to the dam, and chinook are not native. The FN fishery at the mouth is not a conservation issue, the hatchery gets more than enough fish back, and the surplus is loaded in totes and goes to Canfisco. It is maybe harder for the natives to steal shopping carts for the weirs now that the main grocery store loblaws is located in North Park Royal. Most are plastic now not the metal ones that let the water through easily so maybe dont work as well.
 
Well it seems Bobs projection was right.
City news this morning . Sturgeon are in trouble due to netting and the Federal Government MUST do something to save them.
Also shown was all the dead fish on the beach and in nets.
Picture of sturgeon wrapped in nets.


They sure got into the news with their message in a hurry.
Well done!






QUOTE="OldBlackDog, post: 903915, member: 159"]


Breaking news! Pinnipeds are eating all the sturgeon too. (IFS = Interior Fraser Steelhead)


[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Sturgeon are in trouble....between the netting and the daily beatings they take from guides it's a joke.
It used for unwritten rule that you stopped sturgeon fishing end of November till freshet. Now the sturgeon don't get a break...guides offering super cheap rates all winter and beating on the wintering holes.
 
Last edited:
https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/...vPmcsc5AA7Fxr1nT60fqRKrX-JsKQpt5Xikvpx9J7OFMI



Subscribe to RSS Feed
Sign the petition
E-1795 (FISHING INDUSTRY)
42nd Parliament
Initiated by Kevin Estrada from Chilliwack, British Columbia, on July 27, 2018, at 9:06 a.m. (EDT)
keywords
Fisheries policy
Fraser River
Salmon
Sturgeon
The Petition is open for signature until November 24, 2018, at 9:06 a.m. (EDT)

Petition details

PETITION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA
Whereas:
  • Gill nets are the most widely used and implemented salmon harvesting tool on the Fraser River by First Nations and commercial fishermen;
  • Sturgeon are frequently and negatively impacted by the non selective nature of gill nets, succumbing to significant physical damage and regular mortality;
  • Fully attended nets provide effective and expeditious release, unharmed, of salmon stocks of concern and sturgeon; and
  • The Department of Fisheries and Oceans promotes gill net use for salmon harvesting and does not provide nor endorse any alternative salmon harvesting techniques, when at this time, environmentally acceptable and sustainable fish harvesting technologies are a necessity for mixed stock salmon fisheries and to reduce sturgeon encounters and subsequent mortalities.
We, the undersigned, citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to:
1. Encourage, implement and promote alternative sustainable salmon harvesting techniques that will reduce impact on salmon stocks of concern, and reduce and eliminate sturgeon by-catch and their subsequent physical damage and mortality;
2. Provide funding to research and implement sustainable fish harvesting technologies, such as fish wheels, fish traps, and fish-safe seines;
3. Adopt policies and regulations that require gill nets to be fully attended and monitored during entire gill net soak time, while this transition phase of implementation will take time; and
4. Ban all night-time gill net use.

Sponsor

Fin Donnelly
Port Moody—Coquitlam
NDP
British Columbia

History

Open for signature : July 27, 2018, at 9:06 a.m. (EDT)
Closed for signature : November 24, 2018, at 9:06 a.m. (EDT)

Signatures (2553)

Province / Territory
Signatures
Alberta
210
British Columbia
1968
Manitoba
52
New Brunswick
7
Newfoundland and Labrador
5
Nova Scotia
8
Ontario
182
Quebec
29
Saskatchewan
37
Other Countries
55


Sign the petition
 
Dear Sir / Madam,

This message is to inform you that the Science Advisory Report 2018/050 “Recovery Potential Assessment for Chilcotin River and Thompson River Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) designatable units” is now available:

· http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/Publications/SAR-AS/2018/2018_050-eng.html.


A reminder that the deadline to provide feedback on the potential listing of Thompson and Chilcotin Steelhead Trout under the Species at Risk Act is December 2nd, 2018. Please refer to the consultation website for more information on how to provide feedback.

·https://wildlife-species.canada.ca/species-risk-registry/involved/consultation/default_e.cfm


Sincerely,


Karen Leslie

Manager, Species at Risk Program

sara.xpac@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
 
Summary
  • This Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) focuses on the Chilcotin and Thompson River Designatable Units (DU) of Steelhead Trout. Both of these DUs were assessed as Endangered by COSEWIC in an emergency assessment in January 2018.
  • The estimated number of mature fish that returned to fresh water from the sea in the fall of 2017 and spawned in the spring of 2018 was 150 for the Thompson DU and 77 for the Chilcotin DU. The estimated decline of Steelhead Trout spawners over the last three generations has been 79% (over 15 years) for the Thompson DU, and 81% (over 18 years) for the Chilcotin DU.
  • Given the shortened timelines required for an emergency assessment, the advice in this RPA only addresses a subset of the elements required in a full RPA. Outstanding elements will be addressed in the future as the Species at Risk Act processes continue.
  • Threats and limiting factors identified to be most relevant to the survival and recovery of Steelhead Trout include changes in the marine environment, fishing mortality, degradation of freshwater and marine habitats, predation and competition. General categories of threats and limiting factors were agreed to, however the rationale and scoring for level of impact, causal certainty, and threat risk had greater uncertainty and will require further input and evaluation.
  • Recommended Distribution Target is to retain the present level of occupancy in freshwater habitats, thereby avoiding contraction of freshwater range. Five spatial sub-areas within the spawning and juvenile rearing areas of the Thompson DU, including the main stem are recommended and two spatial subdivisions are recommended within the Chilcotin DU. These distribution targets are consistent with current level of occupancy in freshwater habitats, and are believed to be sufficient to avoiding contraction of freshwater range.
  • Recommended Abundance Recovery Target for Thompson Steelhead Trout DU is 938 spawners. This value, which also meets the distribution target, is the total escapement to the DU that results in a 95% probability that a minimum of 100 spawners returns to each of its five sub-areas in the same year. Recommended Abundance Recovery Target for Chilcotin Steelhead Trout DU is 562–744 spawners, using a length-standardized requirement of 1.8–2.4 spawners/km. This also meets the distribution target for the Chilcotin DU.
  • Model simulations suggest increases in future abundances of both DUs are conditional on improvements in natural productivity. Exploitation rate (fishing mortality) reduction has the potential to lessen rates of decline if the most recent productivities observed continue in the future. However, eliminating exploitation alone will not result in population recovery.
  • Uncertainties regarding the exploitation rate estimates, unaccounted for fixed rate terminal harvest, and variations in escapement were identified as having the potential to affect the estimated productivity of each population.
  • For the Thompson DU, simulations estimate that if productivity levels from the most recent year persist (recruits/spawner), recovery is not expected regardless of exploitation rate. If productivities double (10 and 5-year time periods), the estimated recovery probability exceeds 47% for all exploitation rates. However, if the 1-year time period productivity doubles, recovery probability estimates are 12% or less under all exploitation rates.
  • For the Chilcotin DU, simulations estimate that recovery probability is zero at all exploitation rates if productivity levels from the most recent year persist, but recovery probability exceeds 39% at all exploitation rates if productivity increases to 5-year mean level. If the 5- and 10- year mean productivities double (10 and 5-year time periods), the estimated recovery probability exceeds 74% at all exploitation rates.
  • Given the declining and very low abundances of both the Thompson and Chilcotin Steelhead DUs, any harm will inhibit or delay potential recovery and potentially result in further declines in abundance. Allowable harm should not be permitted to exceed current levels and should be reduced to the maximum extent possible. Preventing and mitigating habitat destruction, restoring damaged habitat, and reducing exploitation rates, to the extent possible, are immediate actions that will increase the likelihood that allowable harm will not exceed current levels and promote recovery if productivity increases.
 
Predation

Predation contributes to Steelhead Trout mortality across all life stages in both freshwater and marine environments. Predation contributes to the mortality of Steelhead Trout and other salmon along the sea going migration routes of Thompson and Chilcotin Steelhead Trout (Thomas et al. 2017, Nelson et al. 2018). Berejikian et al. (2016) suggests that predation by Harbour Seals (Phoca vitulina) contributes to mortality of migrating juvenile Steelhead Trout off Washington State. Data are very limited, but Harbour seals have also been known to consume outmigrating smolts in one river estuary of the Strait of Georgia (Thomas et al. 2017). In other systems, seabirds have been identified as important predators of steelhead (Hostetter et al.

2011 and 2012); however this has not been assessed for the Fraser River system. Interestingly, susceptibility of steelhead smolts to bird predation has also been linked to condition and disease (Hostetter et al 2011 and 2012). However, there is a large degree of uncertainty in the mortality rate and level of impact of predators such as pinnipeds on Steelhead Trout. There is further uncertainty regarding the impact of pinnipeds vs other predators or factors which may also contribute to Steelhead Trout declines, in addition to the extrapolation of localized pinniped predation to a coast wide impact. Uncertainty also arises because it is not clear whether in fact predation by any predator is compensatory or additive; that is there are no other factors or predators which would contribute to mortality if a particular predator was removed. Moreover, marine survival rates for steelhead suggest large decreases in survival during periods of low pinniped abundance, and for some stocks, periods of increasing marine survival under high pinniped abundance (Kendall et al. 2017). Although the working paper demonstrated a strong negative correlation between pinniped population growth and steelhead population decline, there was not consensus that there is a causal relationship between the two. Similarly the recommendation for a pinniped cull in the working paper was not supported and requires further investigation. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence fully understand the potential unintended ecosystem consequences of reducing pinniped predation. Predation also occurs on Steelhead eggs, alevins and fry during freshwater incubation and rearing. Fish predators likely include but are not limited to Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus), whitefish, Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkia), juvenile Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), Prickly Sculpin (Cottus asper) and Northern Pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis). In the Nicola system, Northern Pikeminnow is likely the top predator on fry and parr. The mortality rates associated with freshwater predation have not been estimated. Competition and reduced prey in the Ocean Reduced prey availability resulting from higher levels of competition can increase foraging times and lead to higher mortality. Ruggerone and Irvine (2018) show that competition for prey species on which Steelhead Trout depend has increased due to increases in naturally and hatchery-produced Pink, Chum, and Sockeye salmon. The RPA results also suggest that increased competition may be reducing marine survival rates for Thompson and Chilcotin DUs.
 
the otters are busy eating big gold fish in China town right now ;) The Fraser estuary is and has been a disaster for a long long time & need much of attention.. befits all fish and critters...
 
Sturgeon are in trouble....between the netting and the daily beatings they take from guides it's a joke.
It used for unwritten rule that you stopped sturgeon fishing end of November till freshet. Now the sturgeon don't get a break...guides offering super cheap rates all winter and beating on the wintering holes.
So.... these guides are fishing legally throughout the winter for sturgeon. I'm pretty sure I'm reading this correctly. And you are making reference to some "unwritten rule" where people shouldn't fish for sturgeon during the winter months.
This is rather hypocritical; as you seem to be such an advocate for taking what is within your rights.

If the guides are fishing within their rights what's the issue here?

Sounds like you should speak to these guides personally or contact dfo instead of bitching about it on the internet.

Pastafarian
 
Already have....and pretty sure we are going to be seeing changes with sturgeon pretty quick here. When you have a legitimate argument, usually people listen.;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top