Columbia River forecast

fishingbc

Active Member
Columbia River 2010 fall chinook returns look good on paper

Posted by Mark Yuasa

salmonpic.jpg

The Columbia River fall chinook preseason forecasts were released by state Fish and Wildlife, and the overall returns look to be fairly good.

The Lower River hatchery chinook forecast of 90,6000 is the best return since 2004, and slightly greater than the 10-year average. The 2009 actual return was 76,700 compared to forecast of 88,800.

The Lower River wild chinook forecast of 9,700 is slightly improved over last three years, but below 10-year average. The 2009 actual return was 7,500 compared to forecast of 8,500.

The Bonneville Pool hatchery chinook forecast of 169,000 is the best return since 2004, and much greater than the 10-year average. The 2009 return of jacks was a record high. The age-three chinook are 91-percent of total forecast. The 2009 actual return was 49,000 compared to forecast of 59,300.

The Upriver Bright chinook forecast of 310,800 is the best return since 2004. It is a strong return and greater than the 10-year average. The 2009 return of jacks was the highest in 23 years. The age-three chinook are 42-percent of total forecast. The 2009 actual return was 212,000 compared to forecast of 259,900.

The Bonneville Upriver Bright chinook forecast of 30,300 is slightly less than the 2009 actual return, and 69-percent of the 10-year average. The 2009 actual return was 39,000 compared to forecast of 50,000.

The Pool Upriver Bright chinook forecast of 42,300 is similar to the 10-year average. The 2009 actual return was 34,100 compared to forecast of 44,400.

The total forecast of 652,700 Columbia River fall chinook is greater than the 10-year average, and much greater than the 2009 actual return.
 
yeppers, WDFW continues to use the same statistically flawed projection model, year after year. you all of course know that the forcast returns are used to set the extraction quotas. when they fail to show up, well guess what, over harvest rules the day. this pleases the commericals, tribal and non tribal, to no end and simply adds to the further decline of anadramous fish runs. this has been going on since WDFW was DF, nothing new here, just dump more hatchery zombies out there afterall they do get about a 1% return on a good year. tax dollars being flushed to support the commercial harvest. time to tax the commercials for the fish they demand.
 
Couldn't be worse than the DFO Cluster F*%$ for Stamp River Chinook in 2009...even when we told them there were no fish, they made up some bogus number and opened a commercial opening.:( They narrowly missed getting enough eggs for the hatchery, and the only reason they got the numbers was because there were a few really large 5 and 6 year old females that showed up loaded with eggs...otherwise it was a complete Cluster. I have a little more confidence in the US guys over the clouns we have running our local fishery this side of the 49th.[:eek:)][:eek:)]

Searun

th_067.jpg
 
quote:Originally posted by reelfast

yeppers, WDFW continues to use the same statistically flawed projection model, year after year. you all of course know that the forcast returns are used to set the extraction quotas. when they fail to show up, well guess what, over harvest rules the day. this pleases the commericals, tribal and non tribal, to no end and simply adds to the further decline of anadramous fish runs. this has been going on since WDFW was DF, nothing new here, just dump more hatchery zombies out there afterall they do get about a 1% return on a good year. tax dollars being flushed to support the commercial harvest. time to tax the commercials for the fish they demand.
Well thank goodness that you americans are at least pushing out tons of hatchery clones otherwise we wouldn't have any fish here to catch. We can't even do that much.[:I]
 
Back
Top