Government must protect orca habitat: court

IronNoggin

Well-Known Member
Government must protect orca habitat: court
By Judith Lavoie, timescolonist.com February 10, 2012

The federal government is legally bound to protect killer whale critical habitat, the federal Court of Appeal ruled Thursday.

The precedent-setting ruling, which follows a federal court decision last April, could affect fishing and vessel traffic in the Strait of Georgia and Juan de Fuca Strait — critical habitat for endangered southern resident killer whales — and the Queen Charlotte Strait and Johnstone Strait — critical habitat for threatened northern resident killer whales.

"I think it has to affect it," said Margot Venton, staff lawyer for Ecojustice, which acted for a coalition of conservation groups, including the David Suzuki Foundation, Greenpeace, Wilderness Committee, Georgia Strait Alliance, Raincoast Conservation Foundation, Sierra Club and Dogwood Initiative.

Details, such as how much salmon is needed by whales, are likely to be worked out in resident killer whale recovery planning workshops being led by Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

"This is good news for all the endangered species in Canada," Venton said.

"This decision will clarify how government can proceed with all their recovery plans." There are 90 endangered and threatened marine species listed under the Species at Risk Act and all depend on healthy habitats to survive, Venton said.

The Court of Appeal ordered the government to pay costs to Ecojustice.

Last year the federal court ruled in favour of Ecojustice and Judge James Russell criticized the behaviour of DFO saying the department behaved in an "evasive and obstructive way." He then awarded Ecojustice $80,000 in legal costs.

The court said all aspects of whale habitat must be protected, including food supply and quality of their marine environment.

However, DFO appealed the ruling and argued that there are discretionary provisions in the Fisheries Act for protecting critical habitat. Under the Species at Risk Act, critical habitat protection is mandatory.

"The original ruling and now the Court of Appeal's judgment have confirmed that the fate of killer whales should not be left to the discretion of politicians," Venton said. "These whales must be protected by law.

"They need spaces to feed, breed and raise their young if their populations are going to survive and recover."

Venton said she was surprised by DFO's decision to appeal the original decision, especially after the judge said DFO hid behind procedural arguments and wasted "the court's time and judicial resources."

DFO spokeswoman Lara Sloan said the department is reviewing the decision and determining the next steps.

"The government of Canada continues to be committed to meeting its obligations under SARA," she said.

No figures are currently available to show how much the court case and appeal have cost the federal government, Sloan said.

jlavoie@timescolonist.com
© Copyright © The Victoria Times Colonist
http://www.timescolonist.com/techno...protect+orca+habitat+court/6130598/story.htmlhttp://www.timescolonist.com/techno...protect+orca+habitat+court/6130598/story.html
 
I am glad that the courts have forced the DFO (Department of Fishless Oceans) to live up to it's mandate and proctect the Orcas. Looks like we need someone or some group to take them to court to force them to live up to their mandate to protect salmon and salmon habitat, because nothing else will get them to do it.

This on the other hand like r.s craven notes will most likely mean some pretty tough restrictions on sport and commercial fishing in many areas from this point forward. Probably another kick in the groin with a frozen steel toed boot for us sporties.
 
I could see DFO shutting us down permanently if the studies prove Orca's are starving.
I respect the whales, but there are a lot of people that depend on our fishery.
 
The commies have an interesting view!

http://news.ca.msn.com/local/britishcolumbia/bc-killer-whale-habitat-protection-ruled-a-legal-duty

The federal minister of fisheries has no discretion when it comes to protecting the critical habitat of B.C.'s southern resident killer whales, the Federal Court of Appeal has ruled.

The precedent-setting case relates to the Species at Risk Act (SARA).

"We are thrilled with the court's decision and we now look forward to the opportunity to get on with the work of actually protecting the whales," remarked Margot Venton, a lawyer with Ecojustice, an environmental law firm that fought the case on behalf of nine environmental groups.

In a statement issued Friday, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans said it would not comment until it had completed a review of the decision.

The case stems from the plight of southern B.C.'s iconic marine mammal. At last count, there were 87 animals left in the southern orca population that lives in and around Vancouver Island and the Southern Gulf Islands. The group was listed as endangered under the Species at Risk Act in 2003.

Fisheries and Oceans came up with a plan protect the whales and their critical habitat, but left certain elements up to the discretion of the minister.

The court said all elements of the plan must be enshrined in law. That would mean protecting chinook salmon, the whales' main food source, reducing underwater noise from boat, industrial and military activity and cleaning up toxic contamination in the whales' home ecosystem.

Species at Risk Act a 'blunt instrument'

The court ruling could cause problems for B.C.'s sport fishermen. A large part of the whale's diet is chinook salmon and some of those fish may have to be set aside for the whales.

"The need to ensure that killer whales have an adequate diet is a tricky issue," said Gerry Kristianson, chair of the Sport Fishing Advisory Board and a Pacific salmon commissioner. He argues that reducing the sport harvest of chinook doesn't mean that orcas will necessarily benefit.

But Kristianson said he wasn't surprised by the court's decision and he expressed sympathy for the federal department.

"SARA is a blunt instrument," he said, adding he believes Fisheries and Oceans was trying to live up to the spirit of SARA. The problem is that whoever drafted SARA wasn't thinking of the implications for marine animals, Kristianson said.

Kristianson cited the noise pollution example.

"Will this require them to stop ferry traffic between the mainland and Vancouver Island?"

On the other hand, commercial fishermen are happy with the decision.

"There are a lot of things that we would need to be doing to protect killer whales that would affect other areas of the sea," said David Lane, the environment director for the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union.

Lane said dealing with pollution in the southern resident orcas' home would benefit all species in the area. Chinook salmon is not a commercial fish species.

Fisheries and Oceans can seek leave to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.
 
... Chinook salmon is not a commercial fish species.

aYup! Just like there are No Commercial Trollers left any more?
8.gif


Guess Lane must simply speak for the Bag Fleets
4.gif


True though, The Dino has done it's level best to Destroy the trollers, and we (in Area G) are reduced to Chinook ONLY these days.
Methinks this has every possibility of dealing the Final Death Blow not only to us, but may well have some VERY SERIOUS impacts on Salmon Sportfishing overall...

Spooky!!
4.gif

Nog


EDIT to add this message I just sent to the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union:

In today's CBC article: http://news.ca.msn.com/local/britishcolumbia/bc-killer-whale-habitat-protection-ruled-a-legal-duty David Lane noted "Chinook salmon is not a commercial fish species."

This comes at quite the surprise to all of us In Area G Troll who have been squeezed into a "Chinook Only" fishery for many many years now. I strongly suggest that Mr. Lane rectify this error as soon as he possibly can!

Would also appreciate hearing back on his efforts in this regard!

Sincerely,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This could very well affect us. However, like everything else this is a two edged sword that cuts both ways. The DFO can hardly sit back and allow further declines in Chinook. They also have to take more care over the environment and developments in general that could affect Chinook numbers. Can you say fish feed lots, run-of-the river power projects, clear cut logging? They may even look again at those crazy commercial herring fisheries, especially those increases just approved in the Strait which we heard about recently. There will be gains and losses on both sides of the ledger, but maybe we will come out ahead after a few years?
 
I would like to agree with you Englishman, but once the government imposes closures
they are slow to remove them.
The decline in early timed Fraser fish combined with the SARA report on Orca's
could mean the end of our Chinook fishery on the south island.
I hope i'm wrong.
 
I don't think any of the Chinook coming out of the Sooke hatchery are clipped. Time to start doing that and up production. DFO needs to provide funding, get out of the way and stop being the problem.
 
It is time for DFO to admit they allowed the overfishing of salmon stocks especially from the 50's and into the 90's. The modernization of commercial vessels and gear had a huge negative impact on all salmon and stealhead stocks on this coast. Not just here in BC but from California all the way to Alaska. DFO allowed our vessels to take too large a TAC which put the ability of these fish to sustain themselves at risk. Working at a total 25% (average) escapement level didn't allow for any other additional natural die offs to occur without causing a irreversible decline. (ie El Nino) What they did on the east coast has been repeated here. Then to rub salt in the wound they drastically cut back funding and support for SEP. The only program that was sustaining many salmon runs that also supported the orca's, bears, sea lions etc etc. Prohibiting sport fishing as a means to rebuild a fish stock has never worked and never will. DFO needs to ramp SEP back up and sustain these runs until they can once again maintain healthy numbers on their own. Period!
In the big picture the survival of the 90 or so resident orca's is far more important than my personal or business involvement in sport fishing. Therefor if there is an attempt to restrict fishing as some BS means of making it look like they are doing something to fix the problem...I will fight for both myself, others and most importantly for the whales.
 
I'm in the camp that agrees that if there's lots of fish for Orca's there'll be lots of fish for all of us and yes, now maybe we can take the Fed to court on behalf of Pacific salmon as we have them declared a 'critical species', same as herring.

As far as addressing and maintaining water quality for the whales and fish goes, this otta' have the salmon-farmers and all the crooked politicians who are in bed with them shaking in their boots. Each one of these farms dumps as much raw-untreated sewage into Orca habitat as a city of several hundred thousand.
 
if you have followed the debates in the US regarding hatchery supplementation, you probably already are aware that hatchery production is being cut back. the reason is simple, plugging the eco systems with hatchery zombies guarantees that the wild fish will never return. given the ESA protections down this way, it is the wild fish who are beginning to drive the show. now consider that a typical return of hatchery fish is 0.8-1.0% of the total smolt released and you can also see the ROI is not there. depending on the specific hatchery, each returning fish costs from $8-$15 each. is your government ready to spend that kind of money??? now also consider the return rate on wild fish is between 8 and 10% and their success rate at spawning is about 70%, 20-30% for hatchery clones. its pretty clear that paving the way for wild fish is the most economical means of reestablishing depleted runs. this also has the side effect of having to deal with the environmental disasters which has decimated these stocks. this is not an easy arguement or problem to solve, but ramping up hatchery production is not going to achieve the end result you think it will. there is a lot of discussion and experience this side of the border on this exact issue so you may want to read and learn.

another interesting wrinkle is 4 small conservation groups have just filed suit in federal court to stop the planting of out of basin anadramous fish in the soon to be free flowing Elwha river. a multimillion dollar hatchery was built on the lower elwha s'klallam reservation for mitigation purposed, actually a payoff to get them on board. the thought was becasue the dams are coming down in stages, the silt is going to be in the river for some years. to protect the runs, this hatchery was supposed to mitigate. unfortunately the tribe thinks this hatchery is there for them to pump zillions of clones into this soon to be pristine environment so they can make a buck, big bucks. this will be an interesting battle to follow as the suit is focused on ending mitigation not continuing it forever for the benefit of this tribe.
 
aYup! Just like there are No Commercial Trollers left any more?
8.gif


Guess Lane must simply speak for the Bag Fleets
4.gif


True though, The Dino has done it's level best to Destroy the trollers, and we (in Area G) are reduced to Chinook ONLY these days.
Methinks this has every possibility of dealing the Final Death Blow not only to us, but may well have some VERY SERIOUS impacts on Salmon Sportfishing overall...

Spooky!!
4.gif

Nog


EDIT to add this message I just sent to the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union:

In today's CBC article: http://news.ca.msn.com/local/britishcolumbia/bc-killer-whale-habitat-protection-ruled-a-legal-duty David Lane noted "Chinook salmon is not a commercial fish species."

This comes at quite the surprise to all of us In Area G Troll who have been squeezed into a "Chinook Only" fishery for many many years now. I strongly suggest that Mr. Lane rectify this error as soon as he possibly can!

Would also appreciate hearing back on his efforts in this regard!

Sincerely,

I don't suppose that you will get a reply until after the weekend, it will take a couple of huddle sessions before anyone will want to address this!
 
So, Orcas eat Salmon. Salmon eat Herring. Herring eat Krill and Copepods. Start by reducing the Herring and Krill fisheries and the food chain will take care of it's self.
A real food chain

The top four layers of this food chain (top means the largest animal) are:


Layer 1:Orca
A mammal that lives in the ocean. Top of food chain
length: 8 meters
weight 6400 Kg


Layer 2: Salmon
A fish that hatches in a river, matures in the ocean, and returns to the same river to spawn and be eaten by bears.
length: 0.8 m
weight: 10 Kg


Layer 3: Herring
An ocean fish similar to the sardine and a favorite food of the salmon.
length: 0.1 m
weight: 100 g


Layer 4: Copepod
A small crustacean eaten by herring whenever they can catch them.
length: 2 mm
weight: 2 mg
 
When BC springs are out in the ocean preparing to return to BC rivers are they getting targeted by commercial fishermen? Would coded wire tags tell us who is doing fishing of these stocks? Does DFO even have an idea where these fish are getting caught?
GLG
 
Back
Top