Sushihunter
Active Member
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/southeast-alaska-halibut-charters-sunk-fisheries-regulations
Southeast Alaska halibut charters sunk by fisheries regulations
Is this a warning for Alaskans elsewhere?
Lodge owners in the Alaska Panhandle community of Gustavus have some simple career advice for halibut charter guides in the rest of Alaska if the National Marine Fisheries Service goes forward with a plan that would cut the 2012 limit of charter anglers to one fish: Lock the doors, they say, and hang up the "Gone Out Of Business" sign.
Southeast Alaska fishing guides have been operating under a one fish limit for two years, and this season it went from one fish to one fish only under 37 inches. Steve Brown, owner of the Alaska Anglers Inn, said that sealed the fate of his business. He expects this to be his last season because he can't sell fishing trips for what is, by Alaska standards, one small fish.
The new fishing limits for charters are part of a plan developed by the federal fisheries service and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, a government entity controlled by powerful commercial fishing interests, in order to roll back the catch of Alaska charter businesses to provide more fish for the commercial longline halibut fleet.
The changes could devastate a whole segment of the Alaska tourism industry.
"Typically by this time of year, I have 120 to 150 people with deposits already booked for next year," Brown said Tuesday. "I don't have one fisherman booked now. They tell me, 'It's just too expensive for us to come up here and catch a tennis racket every day.'
"We're catching six to eight fish that are too large to retain before we catch one we can keep. It's like working in a Twilight Zone," Brown said.
Down the road from the Anglers Inn at the Eagles Nest Lodge, Kent Huff is in the same predicament. He said he would have gone out of business this summer if not for the people who put their money down a year ago, thinking they'd be able to come to Alaska in the summer of 2011 to catch and keep the monster halibut of their dreams.
"We have all the hostage clients," Huff said, "all the people who'd already paid."
Once those hostage clients are gone, there are no more. Nobody is re-booking. A round-trip ticket from Seattle to Gustavus costs almost $1,000. A three-day stay at Huff's lodge is another $1,780 per person.
Huff was hanging on when clients could dream of posing next to a 100-, 200- or even 300-pound fish hanging from the hoist on the boat, but with the limit set at what Brown calls a "tennis racket" fish, nobody wants to spend the money. They can go fishing to the south in British Columbia where the limit remains one halibut of any size.
"When it was two fish any size, my lodge was full," Huff said. "When it went to one fish any size, we lost 20 percent of our business."
Halibut regulation all about allocations, not conservation
Next year, at one fish under 37 inches, Huff expects to lose another 40 percent or more of what business he has left -- if he keeps the doors open. He's not sure he can cover his overhead with so few people visiting. His clients tell him they can't justify paying the high costs of a fishing vacation in Alaska if the only fish they can keep is a halibut under 37 inches, a fish of about 23 pounds.
"I guess I'm going to be selling my business to someone who has 40 aluminum boats," Huff said.
Anglers using rental boats to fish by themselves can still catch two halibut per day in Southeast. The fisheries management council has directed its NMFS counterparts to impose the 50 percent catch reduction only on guided anglers.
The council, Brown, Huff and others said, appears fearful of the blowback it might face if it tries to cut the limit of all 49th state anglers to one fish, so it has played a divide and conquer game.
Continued - Total of 4 Pages
Southeast Alaska halibut charters sunk by fisheries regulations
Is this a warning for Alaskans elsewhere?
Lodge owners in the Alaska Panhandle community of Gustavus have some simple career advice for halibut charter guides in the rest of Alaska if the National Marine Fisheries Service goes forward with a plan that would cut the 2012 limit of charter anglers to one fish: Lock the doors, they say, and hang up the "Gone Out Of Business" sign.
Southeast Alaska fishing guides have been operating under a one fish limit for two years, and this season it went from one fish to one fish only under 37 inches. Steve Brown, owner of the Alaska Anglers Inn, said that sealed the fate of his business. He expects this to be his last season because he can't sell fishing trips for what is, by Alaska standards, one small fish.
The new fishing limits for charters are part of a plan developed by the federal fisheries service and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, a government entity controlled by powerful commercial fishing interests, in order to roll back the catch of Alaska charter businesses to provide more fish for the commercial longline halibut fleet.
The changes could devastate a whole segment of the Alaska tourism industry.
"Typically by this time of year, I have 120 to 150 people with deposits already booked for next year," Brown said Tuesday. "I don't have one fisherman booked now. They tell me, 'It's just too expensive for us to come up here and catch a tennis racket every day.'
"We're catching six to eight fish that are too large to retain before we catch one we can keep. It's like working in a Twilight Zone," Brown said.
Down the road from the Anglers Inn at the Eagles Nest Lodge, Kent Huff is in the same predicament. He said he would have gone out of business this summer if not for the people who put their money down a year ago, thinking they'd be able to come to Alaska in the summer of 2011 to catch and keep the monster halibut of their dreams.
"We have all the hostage clients," Huff said, "all the people who'd already paid."
Once those hostage clients are gone, there are no more. Nobody is re-booking. A round-trip ticket from Seattle to Gustavus costs almost $1,000. A three-day stay at Huff's lodge is another $1,780 per person.
Huff was hanging on when clients could dream of posing next to a 100-, 200- or even 300-pound fish hanging from the hoist on the boat, but with the limit set at what Brown calls a "tennis racket" fish, nobody wants to spend the money. They can go fishing to the south in British Columbia where the limit remains one halibut of any size.
"When it was two fish any size, my lodge was full," Huff said. "When it went to one fish any size, we lost 20 percent of our business."
Halibut regulation all about allocations, not conservation
Next year, at one fish under 37 inches, Huff expects to lose another 40 percent or more of what business he has left -- if he keeps the doors open. He's not sure he can cover his overhead with so few people visiting. His clients tell him they can't justify paying the high costs of a fishing vacation in Alaska if the only fish they can keep is a halibut under 37 inches, a fish of about 23 pounds.
"I guess I'm going to be selling my business to someone who has 40 aluminum boats," Huff said.
Anglers using rental boats to fish by themselves can still catch two halibut per day in Southeast. The fisheries management council has directed its NMFS counterparts to impose the 50 percent catch reduction only on guided anglers.
The council, Brown, Huff and others said, appears fearful of the blowback it might face if it tries to cut the limit of all 49th state anglers to one fish, so it has played a divide and conquer game.
Continued - Total of 4 Pages
Last edited by a moderator: