Herring staging on the east coast of the Rock

Well I’m not convinced closing farms or stopping herring fisheries will cause enough benefit to salmon to warrant eliminating these industries. Together these industries may contribute more to the economy than just sportfishng. People need jobs! What other sustainable industry do you recommend the farmers and fishermen go to if their present work was eliminated? Sportfishing isn’t much of an option anymore!

You’re right, sportfishing isn’t much of an option anymore. It’s facing the exact same reality as commercial fishing. I had always wanted to start my own charter company such as you have but realized it’s an uncertain future and found employment elsewhere.

The herring fishery is short term employment for a relatively small group of people with a long term cost to the environment and a large group of people. I guess we will have to agree to disagree on it.

Land based salmon farming is the obvious alternative to what you just posted. It’s not financially feasible with the open pen alternative but the market will still be there and they will find a way to make it work if forced. That’s a different topic I don’t want to derail this thread to Fish farms.
 
Last edited:
The Strait of Georgia is mainly what we are talking about here, and the fishery is worth at $500 per ton $11.5 million. At 300 per ton its about $8million. Thats in an economy with a GDP of $221 Billion for the province, 1.8 Trillion for the country. So yes it will effect a small number of fisherman, but it pales in comparison in impact how cuts to forestry, or mechanization of agriculture or any number of changes to the economy through technological change imapact jobs. The fish farming industry has more jobs and value to be sure, and why it likely will never be forced off the water by government, technological change and consumer sentiment will need to do that. No one action will be a silver bullet, but we know there are tens of millions of smolts that go into the strait, and disappear as young fish. I know you want us to believe there is only one cause, water chemistry and nothing else matter, and it well may be part of the puzzle, but I personally believe there are many factors, and removing 20% of the herring biomass just before it spawns, effectively reducing 20% of a major potential source of food for small organisms including young salmon (over a trillion eggs, huge numbers of larvae and juvenile herring) has the potential to effect the ecosystem. For such a small value fishery, I personally don't see the benefit to potential cost trade off to be favourable.

Well as stated that is your opinion. I’m on the water for the last 4 days running up and down the straight and I can tell you there is far more than 120,000 tons in the gulf. The test boats found that in 2 days without even looking hard. The harvest is far below 20% and the value is far higher than $500. So if you are going to argue, argue facts and not what you “personally believe”.
 
Well as stated that is your opinion. I’m on the water for the last 4 days running up and down the straight and I can tell you there is far more than 120,000 tons in the gulf. The test boats found that in 2 days without even looking hard. The harvest is far below 20% and the value is far higher than $500. So if you are going to argue, argue facts and not what you “personally believe”.
From 2017, I havent seen for 2018. This is where i get the 20%nfrom a DFO representative. You personally figured out how much stock there is? Sounds like YOUR opinion.

Brenda Spence, resource manager with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, monitored the fishery aboard the 19-metre Canadian Coast Guard vessel, Neocaligus. “Stocks are really healthy this year,” she said. “The forecast is for near-historic highs.”
Gillnetters are expected to harvest 13,763 tonnes while the seine fleet takes 11,805 tonnes in the Strait of Georgia. Combined, that is 8,025 tonnes more than last year. Spence said the maximum harvest rate is 20 per cent of the projected number of spawners.

And from a 2016 Article in Times colonist:
Bill Forbes, of Lasqueti Fishing Co. Ltd., said from Nanoose that plants are paying about $300 per ton, with a possibility of an additional $50 per ton down the road, for seine-caught herring. Gillnetters are commanding about $500 per ton because they can adjust the size of their nets to target larger fish.

And from a 2017 Vancouver sun article that supports the 2016 one:
And while the Japanese aren’t paying what they did for the roe in the late 1970s to the late 1990s — prices to fishermen have dropped from a high of about $5,000 per tonne to several hundred dollars — the fishery helps to maintain the infrastructure of the industry, including its processing facilities.

SO the take of up to 20% and $300-$500 per ton are my opinion? Maybe you should take your own advice.
 
Well as stated that is your opinion. I’m on the water for the last 4 days running up and down the straight and I can tell you there is far more than 120,000 tons in the gulf. The test boats found that in 2 days without even looking hard. The harvest is far below 20% and the value is far higher than $500. So if you are going to argue, argue facts and not what you “personally believe”.

Some good points. The $200-300 off the boat was a quote from last years season. When the dust settles at the end of the year what do you think you will be getting for a total price per ton?

The 20% harvest rate is directly in DFOs management plan for this fishery and how they allocate quota. It isn’t a personal belief. With 29,000 tons out of the Salish sea this year that assumes a 145,000 ton biomass at a 20% harvest rate.
 
Well as stated that is your opinion. I’m on the water for the last 4 days running up and down the straight and I can tell you there is far more than 120,000 tons in the gulf. The test boats found that in 2 days without even looking hard. The harvest is far below 20% and the value is far higher than $500. So if you are going to argue, argue facts and not what you “personally believe”.
Is it just your opinion that there is far more than 120,000 tons in the gulf or can you point us to some posted data to check out. Where are the facts to support a value far higher than $500.00 per ton so we can reference? Thanks for the info and I would like to point out in California they cap the take at up to 5% of the spawners based on data and precautionary principle.
 
And just in case you think the DFO rep talking about Historic abundance means pre-fishing, it does not. The quote from the article makes it clear what she (Brenda Spence) means by "historic" abundance in 2017.

“Stocks in the strait are robust,” and similar to last year, Spence said. They are at levels seen in the early 2000s. She also said the quality is higher this year.

So the stocks are at levels seen during a time when they were actively and heavily fished, but just not yet decimated. The stocks in the Strait of Georgia need to be left alone and not have 20% removed to attempt to restore them to REAL historic abundance, and perhaps make a start in restoring the ecology of the strait with its most important prey species.
 
California.
Do you think herring stock abundancies in the straight were consistent pre fishing? If so how is it that other forage species that are not fished vary so much?
 
From 2017, I havent seen for 2018. This is where i get the 20%nfrom a DFO representative. You personally figured out how much stock there is? Sounds like YOUR opinion.

Brenda Spence, resource manager with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, monitored the fishery aboard the 19-metre Canadian Coast Guard vessel, Neocaligus. “Stocks are really healthy this year,” she said. “The forecast is for near-historic highs.”
Gillnetters are expected to harvest 13,763 tonnes while the seine fleet takes 11,805 tonnes in the Strait of Georgia. Combined, that is 8,025 tonnes more than last year. Spence said the maximum harvest rate is 20 per cent of the projected number of spawners.

And from a 2016 Article in Times colonist:
Bill Forbes, of Lasqueti Fishing Co. Ltd., said from Nanoose that plants are paying about $300 per ton, with a possibility of an additional $50 per ton down the road, for seine-caught herring. Gillnetters are commanding about $500 per ton because they can adjust the size of their nets to target larger fish.

And from a 2017 Vancouver sun article that supports the 2016 one:
And while the Japanese aren’t paying what they did for the roe in the late 1970s to the late 1990s — prices to fishermen have dropped from a high of about $5,000 per tonne to several hundred dollars — the fishery helps to maintain the infrastructure of the industry, including its processing facilities.

SO the take of up to 20% and $300-$500 per ton are my opinion? Maybe you should take your own advice.


Nope not my opinion fact. And a touch of my own input from doing this for 25yrs.


ROE HERRING INFORMATION BULLETIN: 07

DATE: Mar 1, 2018 PM


STRAIT OF GEORGIA

AREA 14
Shelter Pt to Cape Lazo-------Mar 1: assessing tons
E.C. Denman Island------------Mar 1: 700 tons
TEST: Feb 27 on 1,000 tons Outside White Spit: 8.6%;19.7cm;52m:47f;38-4-5-0-1
(22.8g:99.7g)
Lambert Ch. to Chrome Is------Feb 27:87,500 tons
Test: Feb 28, 1.4 miles east of Chrome Island: 5.1%;19.3cm;77m:51f;25-4-21-0-3
(20.8g:76.4g)
E.C. Hornby Is----------------Feb 26: Small school
Tribune Bay/Lower Hornby------Feb 22: 4,000 tons
Upper Baynes Sd---------------Mar 1: 300 tons
Lower Baynes Sd---------------Mar 1: 800 tons
Mapleguard to Nile Cr---------Feb 25: 4,000 tons
Nile Creek to French Cr-------Feb 25: 7,000 tons
Test: Feb 27 on 4,000 tons 2.2 miles north of Qualicum Beach:
1.8%;18.7cm;62m:72f;10-18-44-0-0; (17.3g:74.8g)
French Cr to NW Bay-----------Feb 25: 1,300 tons

Total 14: 110,250 tons

That is after 3 days of assessing and they have not assessed north or east of Lazo

Last year gross sales price for good quality herring $2800.

The goal is not to reach historical levels it’s to find balance. The stock is stable and larger than last year so one could conclude that removals last year are scientifically defensible. This year the quota is a little less.

Also there is a significant portion of the year classes (gear size is for older herring) that are caught that would die from natural mortality so the impact is again less.
 
Last edited:
California.
Do you think herring stock abundancies in the straight were consistent pre fishing? If so how is it that other forage species that are not fished vary so much?

I'm sure they did vary with oceanic condition, there is always fluctuations as you mention. There have been times when 200,000 Tons in reduction fisheries were taken followed by severe declines. Its hard to link those to natural bariation. Currently regardless of the fluctuations, we scoop out 20% of whatever biomass is estimated to show up. I guess it can be argued if it is the right amount. Canadian fish managers don't have great track records of allowing sustainable percentages of catch on either coast. The State of California caps the San Francisco bay catch at 5% of the estimated run, they believe that is a sustainable catch level. With close to 100 years of fishing these stocks at various levels, we (speaking of fisheries managers) don't even know what the natural or true historic levels of herring is in the straight. IMO I don't think its unreasonable to lay of the herring and let it rebound to whatever level that is (with fluctuations) for a period of time and then mange it more like the State of California.
 
I am also curious of you take in the coastal collapse in starfish and blue mussels in 2013-14. What do you think happend there? Do feel this could possibly be effecting herring and salmon in the Georgia straight?
 
None of it matters unless you guys plan to start whaleing up again.

Humpback whale populations have been and are currently increasing at a pretty good rate.

In order to allow the increase we can’t be taking out any forage fish period.

There’s people in Alaska asking to start whaling back up. Seriously
 
Fish4all what is the average price boats will receive per ton, including seine caught fish?

When you say jimmy pays his boats $300 per ton do you mean he pays that to boats fishing his quota?

I understand your argument for balance instead of historical highs but this can’t be viewed in the same light as every other fishery. There are too many species reliant on herring that currently need every bit of help they can get. This isn’t a fix all, it’s a small step in a long ladder of issues.
 
None of it matters unless you guys plan to start whaleing up again.

Humpback whale populations have been and are currently increasing at a pretty good rate.

In order to allow the increase we can’t be taking out any forage fish period.

There’s people in Alaska asking to start whaling back up. Seriously

If whale populations are increasing would that not insinuate there is enough food?
 
From the 2017 PHIFMP

Section 2.2
At this time, there is no information available on the appropriate conservation limits for herring
based on ecosystem considerations. It is recognized that herring plays a critical role in the
ecosystem and are a food source for a variety of species. The current maximum harvest rate of
20% under the herring management framework is believed to be conservative
—most juveniles
and a significant proportion of the adult population should remain available to support ecosystem
processes. Recent research indicates that the interplay of food supply and predation impacts on
herring survival and production is complex and not readily predictable (Schweigert et al. 2010).
Research is ongoing to better understand these ecosystem processes and the role herring plays in
maintaining the integrity and functioning of the ecosystem


So they admit they don't really know what appropriate conservation limits are, and the interplay with predators and the impact on the ecosystem isn't really known either. They do know however herring are critical, and still allow up to 20% to be taken without any good science on why.
 
Fish4all what is the average price boats will receive per ton, including seine caught fish?

When you say jimmy pays his boats $300 per ton do you mean he pays that to boats fishing his quota?

I understand your argument for balance instead of historical highs but this can’t be viewed in the same light as every other fishery. There are too many species reliant on herring that currently need every bit of help they can get. This isn’t a fix all, it’s a small step in a long ladder of issues.

$300 is what jimmy pays the seine boats he controls. This years price has not been negotiated so it’s not known. It looks like there will be quota left in the water, the Canadian dollar is weaker so until August we are not sure.

I fully agree our salmon needs help. Herring have been harvested for a lot longer than the declines we are seeing in salmon.
 
How do you figure quota will be left in the water? Gillnetters are close to filling their quota and the seine boats just opened.
 
Back
Top